 PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THE ABOVE LOGO ON YOUR SITE AND THROUGHOUT THE INTERNET. Thank you for your support. |
 The Extradition, Torture and Electronic Mind Control of U.S. Citizen John Gregory Lambros, a Native of Minnesota |
|
What's new?
AND
AND
This "MOTION" is 8 pages in length, with zero (0) pages of exhibits - a total of 8 pages in PDF Format.
DOWNLOAD LAMBROS’ AUGUST 3, 2020, RESPONSE TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH WRIGHT’S “REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION”, FILED: JULY 20, 2020. This is a TORT CLAIM for $20 Million Dollars. - 42 TOTAL PAGES IN PDF FORMAT HERE.
DOWNLOAD JUNE 23, 2017 "WRIT OF MANDAMUS" IN PDF FORMAT - 39 TOTAL PAGES.
DOWNLOAD "FSIA" COMPLAINT AGAINST BRAZIL IN PDF FORMAT - 136 TOTAL PAGES.
DOWNLOAD "FSIA" MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN PDF FORMAT - 24 TOTAL PAGES.
DOWNLOAD "FSIA" MOTION TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF COMPLAINT IN PDF FORMAT - 8 TOTAL PAGES.
DOWNLOAD COURT'S "ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL" - 2 TOTAL PAGES.
DOWNLOAD COURT'S "ORDER" REQUIRING LAMBROS TO TRANSLATE DOCUMENT - 4 TOTAL PAGES IN PDF FORMAT.
MARCH 21, 2018: Lambros informs court of U.S. Parole Commission, NOTICE OF ACTION that concludes May 17, 1991 arrest in Brazil, extradition from Brazil and incarceration in the United States on the August 21, 1989 PAROLE VIOLATION WARRANT WAS ILLEGAL. REASON: "RULE OF SPECIALTY" applied to Lambros' case. This is a 3 page motion with 2 pages of exhibits. See, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE, et al., No. 2017-CA-929-B. PDF FORMAT.
Lambros files the above two motion due to the October 24, 2012 denial of his request to file a successive habeas application in the district court. Please note that Judge Diana Murphy denied Lambros' request which is not legal, as she was the District Court Judge that ORIGINALLY CONDUCTED THE TRIAL AND SENTENCING OF LAMBROS IN THIS ACTION. A JUDGE CANNOT JUDGE HIS OR HER OWN WORK! Lambros has requested that the panel of judges vacate the order and assign a new three judge panel to review Lambros' request. Also, of interest is the fact the panel of judges DID NOT offer an opinion within the denial, when the law requires the court to state the REASONS FOR DENIAL EITHER BY INFORMAL MEMORANDUM, BY RECITAL IN AN ORDER, OR BY FINDINGS. The above motions are thirteen (13) pages total, which includes a cover letter to the court and two pages of exhibits. This document is in PDF FORMAT. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427 (8th Circuit Court of Appeals) DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 5, 2012 - LAMBROS' "MOTION FOR RECUSAL" AND "PETITION FOR REHEARING' - HERE IN PDF.
Circuit Court Judges Diana Murphy, SMITH and BENTON denied Lambros successive § 2255 without offering the reasons for denial either by informal memorandum, by recital in an order, or by findings - as required by law. See, Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 "....... DETERMINE THE ISSUES AND MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT AND WITH RESPECT THERETO. ..." JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427. DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 24, 2012 - "JUDGMENT" BY U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR EIGHTH CIRCUIT - HERE IN PDF.
Lambros informs the Eighth Circuit of the September 28, 2012, OPINION in TYRONE W. MILES vs. MICHAEL MARTEL, WARDEN, No. 10-15633, by Circuit Judge Betty B. Fletcher of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, who applied the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in LAFLER vs. COOPER and MISSOURI vs. FRYE, RETROACTIVELY. "By applying this holding in LAFLER, a habeas petition subject to AEDPA, the Court necessarily implied that this holding applies to habeas petitioners WHOSE CASES ARE ALREADY FINAL ON DIRECT REVIEW; i.e. THAT THE HOLDING APPLIES RETROACTIVELY." This is a short motion with an exhibit containing portions of MILES vs. MARTEL, as to the application of RETROACTIVE APPLICATION. The motion is 4 pages with cover letter and 4 pages of exhibits - 8 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann M. Anaya and U.S. Attorney B. Todd Jones respond to John Lambros June 8, 2012 "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3) and § 2255(h)(2) BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." Please note that the District Court Clerk for the District of Minnesota did not file Lambros' motion and mailed it directly to the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Case No. 12-2427. The government's motion is ten (10) pages and nineteen (19) pages of exhibit - 29 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT. DOWNLOAD JULY 23, 2012 GOVERNMENT RESPONSE MOTION TO LAMBROS' 5 2255, HERE IN PDF.
Lambros response to the government's response and requests that United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to proceed in this action, as the government has ADMITTED TO ALL THE ALLEGATIONS WITHIN LAMBROS' §2255, due to violations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 10(b) and Rule 8(b) and Rule 8(d). THIS IS AN EXCELLENT MOTION THAT HIGHLIGHTS FACTS COVERED-UP BY THE U.S. Department of State and the Government's use of the incorrect criminal statutes against Lambros. This motion is 19 pages in length with another 1 page cover letter and 15 pages of exhibits - 35 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.
The new free classified and Local Business Directory advertising site covers 50 countries and all zip and postal codes within each country. We believe this site could lead to new sources of exposure for BOYCOTT BRAZIL. John Lambros is requesting that all supporters "SPREAD THE WORD" and GO THERE AND ADD A FREE CLASSIFIED AD OR LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS. It will take only five minutes. Thank you!" Click here for the August-September 2007, PRESS RELEASE "Free Online 'Local Business Directory' And Classified Advertising Site Covers 50 Countries - A Click Away!!!"
PRESS RELEASE - MAY-JUNE 2006, "GRAND OPENING" This document is in PDF FORMAT.
DOWNLOAD JANUARY 12, 2000, LETTER FROM LAMBROS TO JUDGE MASON AMD JUDGE DOTY HERE IN PDF.
COURTS: Office of Professional Responsibility Rules Minnesota Supreme Court Need Not Follow State Constitution." This memorandum is a total of six (6) pages including exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. DOWNLOAD JULY 04,, 2004, MEMORADUM TO SUPPORTERS OF BOYCOTT BRAZIL BY RON SIMMAT HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD MAY 06, 2004, LETTER FROM OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD APRIL 29, 2004 COMPLAINT AGAINST MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 9, 2002 ARTICLE "WHERE'S THE JURISDICTION JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER!" HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD SILICONE ANTIBODY TEST DOCUMENT DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2002 HERE IN PDF.
|
|
October 26, 2022: Petitioner John Lambros contacted the law office of Foley Hoag LLP, who represents Brazil within the Supreme Court of the United States, JOHN LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, Civil Action Number: 22-5604. The Supreme Court Clerk mailed John Lambros notice that Brazil's BRIEF IN OPPOSITION was due on Wednesday October 19, 2022. On Monday, October 24, 2022 Lambros spoke with the clerk of the Supreme court to check if a response by Foley Hoag LLP - Brazil was filed to John Lambros’ Writ of Certiorari, the clerk stated NO RESPONSE WAS FILED. Therefore, Brazil chooses NOT TO RESPOND. Questions? Has Brazil conceded to John Lambros’ issues raised? Will the case be remanded back to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia to proceed with Judge Pan's ORDER on April 8, 2019 and May 15, 2019 granting Petitioner John Lambros' "MOTION REQUESTING ENTRY OF DEFAULT". See, Lockhart vs. CADE, 728 A.2d 65 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, March 4, 1999)("entry of default 'operates as an admission by the defaulting party that there are NO ISSUES OF LIABILITY, but leaves the issue of damages unresolved until entry of judgment'"). Therefore, John Lambros would have no further obligation to prove liability. Question? - is this now a winner winner chicken dinner for BILLIONS OF US DOLLARS to John Lambros? What will the TAX PAYERS of Brazil be saying about the Brazilian Supreme Court legal ruling allowing John Lambros to be extradited to the United States when the only sentence he could receive and did receive was a MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE. Brazil does not have LIFE SENTENCES - 30 YEAR MAXIMUM - CONSPIRACY FOR DRUGS IS TEN (10) YEAR MAXIMUM - A SENTENCE JOHN LAMBROS SHOULD OF RECEIVED. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution. John Lambros was sentenced by Brazil to a MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE!
:
Please visit, sign, promote, and establish links to
Send a message to John Gregory Lambros
Use Google to Search the Boycott Brazil
Site
FREE TRANSLATION SERVICES OF THIS WEB SITE INTO ANOTHER LANGUAGE
BOYCOTT BRAZIL knows it's a big world out there, and many visitors to this site may need help interpreting the content of this web site. Therefore, I am offering links to FREE TRANSLATION SERVICES online for quick translations of individual words, e-mail messages, or entire web pages. The following free translation services might not pass muster at an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council, but they will help you understand BOYCOTT BRAZIL:
1. Google: allows for translation into 40 languages.CLICK HERE. For automatic translation in instant messaging in 12 languages you must add a translation robot at: http://bot.talk.google.com
2. FreeTranslation: www.freetranslation.com
3. Systran: www.systransoft.com
4. If you need a dictionary to consult on any of the words used in this site, please go to the best dictionary site on the internet. The site offers dictionariesfor 270 languages: www.yourdictionary.com
POST FREE CLASSIFIED ADS, BUSINESS DIRECTORY LISTING AND YELLOW PAGE LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS - WITHIN 50 COUNTRIES. SEARCHING FOR A SPECIAL ITEM? SEARCH OVER 35 MILLION CLASSIFIED ADS WITH OVER 500,000 NEW ADS DAILY!!! Visite: www.NoPayClassifieds.com.
What's Going on Here?
or
How to Find Your Way Around this Web Site.
|
This homepage is
an Then the rest of this At the end, you will find Have fun! And come |
|
Links to other victims and web
sites
discussing every aspect of electronic mind control.
Links to other victims and web
sitesdiscussing every aspect of electronic mind control.
The
URL for this homepage is:
http://www.brazilboycott.org
The
URL for this homepage is:http://www.brazilboycott.org
No fiction writer would dare to use what really happened to an American businessman in Brazil as the story line for a novel. It would certainly be called "not believable" by the critics. But sadly, what is "not believable" as fiction really happened to John Gregory Lambros.
Minnesota stockbroker, investment banker and international businessman John Gregory Lambros was arrested on May 17, 1991, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. He was denied a bail hearing and bail that had been previously approved by the U.S. federal district court judge that authorized his arrest in Brazil. Lambros was denied court appearances required by the Brazilian Constitution, and his family was ripped-off by scamming Rio de Janeiro attorneys: CARLOS ROBERTO SCHLESINGER, NELIO ROBERTO SEIDL MACHADO, RUY LUDOLF RIBEIRO, and VERNON DALE McNAMEE. Lambros was held in degrading conditions in Rio de Janeiro and Brasilia, Brazil, and tortured in Brazilia, Brazil while awaiting extradition to the State of Minnesota.
You say, "That's what happens when you get arrested in a third-world country, right?" Well maybe, but the usual foreign arrest doesn't include the high-tech depaterning (interrogation) that Lambros was subjected to: a form of torture akin to living inside a toaster, bombarded by an intense elector-magnetic field twenty-four hours each day. But when depaterning apparently didn't deliver the results the Brazilians (acting as U.S. agents) wanted (or needed) from Lambros, implants were surgically implanted in Lambros's brain to interrogate, monitor and control him.
To add insult to injury, the Brazilian Supreme Court ILLEGALLY granted Lambros' extradition to the United States on April 30, 1992, knowing Lambros could only receive a MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE. The Brazilian Supreme Court had been advised several times by the United States Embassy in Brasilia, Brazil and by Lambros that the Brazilian Constitution did not allow extradition of persons facing a life sentence. The Brazilian Constitution prohibits any penalty of a lifelong character (Article 5, clause XLVII, b) and Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, limits the maximum sentence in Brazil to THIRTY (30) YEARS. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1352 (Washington, 1997). Lambros COULD NOT legally be extradited, as proven by Mexico's Supreme Court, who blocks the extradition of criminal suspects facing life sentences in the United States. See, "INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION NEWS" section within this web site for details. In fact, the Brazilian Supreme Court never applied "The Doctrine of Dual Criminality" to Lambros' criminal conduct. 'Double criminality' is in effect a reciprocity REQUIREMENT which is intended to ensure both the U.S. and Brazil that they can rely on CORRESPONDING TREATMENT. In November 1997, Lambros retained the U.S. and Brazilian Lawyers for MARTIN SHAW PANG, who advised Lambros that CONSPIRACY to distribute cocaine is specifically addressed in Brazilian Law No. 6368, Article 14, and carries a sentence of THREE (3) to TEN (10) YEARS. Therefore, the Brazilian Supreme Court by resolution should of at least stated to the United States that Lambros MUST NOT BE SENTENCED TO PRISON FOR MORE THAN THREE (3) to TEN (10) YEARS. CLICK HERE FOR PDF COPY OF DECEMBER 19, 1997 LETTER FROM MARTIN SHAW PANG'S U.S. AND BRAZILIAN ATTORNEY'S TO LAMBROS. (December 19, 1997 letter from Attorney Timothy Dole, Browne & Ressler, Seattle, Wa. and Attorney Dr. Roberto B. Dias da Silva, Escritorio de Advocacia; Rua Marconi, n053 - Coni. 83; Sao Paulo, SP; Brazil to Lambros. This letter offers an excellent overview about statutes of limitation and maximum sentences for drugs within Brazil's Penal Code).
Back in the U.S.A. there was a massive cover-up by the CIA, the Department of Justice, and the State Department, supported by the government and courts of Brazil. Lambros has now sustained years of torture and mind control. He has also been denied the freedom to practice his religion. Lambros remains imprisoned by the federal government, and has been denied the medical treatment he so desperately needs. Lambros' sentence was overturned on September 8, 1995 by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals that vacated his mandatory life sentence without parole because the sentence was not legal under a law in effect at the time of his alleged crime. See U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 1995). The sentencing mistake occurred with the consent and assistance of Lambros' court-appointed attorney, CHARLES FAULKNER. Lambros was re-sentenced to thirty-eight (38) years, 30-year sentence with a 8-year term of supervised release, to be served upon release from imprisonment, thus a 38-year term. See, U.S. vs. ROBERTS, 5 F.3d 365, 369 (9th Cir. 1993). PLUS a CONSECUTIVE 5,357 DAY SENTENCE that he WAS NOT EXTRADITED ON, which was a breach of Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, which limits the maximum prison sentence to thirty (30) years in Brazil and DENIED his request to vacate three (3) other counts as per Brazilian law under the legal terms of Bis in Idem, Mutatis Mutandis, and the Principle of Subsidiarity, that have been granted to other Americans extradited from Brazil. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P. 2d 1293 (Wash. 1997) and AFFIRMED by the U. S. Supreme Court, 139 L.Ed.2d 608.
The following facts and proof of this case didn't support Brazil's extradition and treatment of Lambros. - You can't fit a square peg in a round hole. The peg simply won't fit. - When you don't have the law, you pound the facts. And when you don't have the facts you pound the law. If you don't have either, you pound the table. And that's what you've been seeing from Brazil since Lambros was arrested in 1991. But no matter how hard Brazil pounds, the peg still doesn't fit.
: Mr.
Lambros offers proof as to the above sentence he received and the
laws affecting same by offering the court document written and
researched by the oldest and whom most consider the most
prestigious law firm in Minnesota, BRIGGS AND MORGAN, P.A., dated
August 15, 2000, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, et al, Civil No.
98-1621(DSD/JMM), U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota. The
following first four (4) pages of the August 15, 2000, "PLAINTIFF'S
MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' COMPREHENSIVE MOTION TO
DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT" offers an excellent summary
overview. You may download the entire 29 page document IN PDF
FORMAT BY CLICKING
HERE. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM
ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING
HERE.
 |
 |
 |
 |
The 1988 new constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil (Republica Federative do Brasil) clearly states within Title II, Fundamental Rights and Guarantees, Chapter I, Individual and Collective Rights and Duties, ARTICLE 5:
Article 5. - All persons are equal before the law, without any distinction whatsoever, and Brazilians and foreigners resident in Brazil are assured of inviolability of the right to life, to liberty, to quality, to security and to property, on the following terms:
III: no one shall be submitted to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment;
IV: the expression of thought is free, and anonymity is forbidden;
V: the right to answer is ensured, in proportion to the offense, besides compensation for property or moral damages or damages to the image;
X: the privacy, private life, honor and image of person are inviolable, and the right to COMPENSATION for property or moral damages resulting from the violation thereof is ensured;
XXXIX: there is no crime without a previous law which defines it, nor is there any punishment without a previous legal imposition;
XL: THE PENAL LAW SHALL NOT BE RETROACTIVE, EXCEPT TO THE BENEFIT OF THE DEFENDANT; (How can the Treaty of Extradition Between the United States of America and the United States of Brazil, signed on January 13, 1961, be legal?)
XLI: the law shall punish any discrimination against fundamental rights and liberties;
XLVII: there shall be NO SENTENCE: b) of life imprisonment; e) which is cruel.
IXXIV: the State shall provide full and gratuitous legal assistance to whoever proves not to have sufficient funds;
LXXV: THE STATE SHALL INDEMNIFY A PERSON CONVICTED BY A JUDICIAL ERROR, AND ALSO A CONVICT WHO REMAINS IMPRISONED LONGER THU THE PERIOD ESTABLISHED IN THE SENTENCE;
LXXVII: Paragraph 2. - The rights and guarantees established in this Constitution DO NOT PRECLUDE others arising out of the regime and the principles adopted by it, or out of INTERNATIONAL TREATIES TO WHICH THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IS A PARTY.
DOWNLOAD ARTICLE 5 OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL HERE IN PDF.
Since Lambros' resentencing in 1997, the following legal events have occurred in brief and contained in total, as funds exist, within this web site:
1. June 1998, Lambros' COMMERCIAL LIEN and Declaratory Judgment/complaint against Attorney Faulkner for malpractice. On February 14, 2001, Judge David S. Doty gave Attorney Faulkner IMMUNITY. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeal upheld Judge Doty's ORDER without even reviewing Lambros' appeal brief on October 17, 2001.
2. June 13, 2000, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ORDERED Lambros to serve a consecutive 5,357 day sentence that he was not extradited on from Brazil.
3. April 13, 2001, MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDER BY JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b)(6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 28 USCA §455. On March 08, 2002, Judge David S. Doty dismissed Lambros' motion stating he did not have JURISDICTION. On April 10, 2002, Lambros filed a NOTICE OF APPEAL and MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.
4. August 09, 2001, Lambros requested U.S. Senator Charles Ernest Grassley and the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" to investigate his torture and illegal extradition from Brazil.
5. February 15, 2002, Lambros' complaint to the MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY as to the actions of Minnesota Attorneys PETER J. THOMPSON, JOSEPH T. WALBRAN, and ROBERT G. RENNER in 1976, that carries forward to this point in time. On April 12, 2002 Lambros' complaint was denied as to Attorneys THOMPSON and WALBRAN. On April 20, 2002, Lambros appealed the April 12, 2002 ORDER.
Lambros believes the current investigation by U.S. Senator Charles Ernest Grassley and the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" will expose and verify all facts contained within this web site. Thanking you in advance for reviewing and supporting the BOYCOTT BRAZIL web site.
|
PLEASE NOTE: "Guimaraes, 58, faces NO MORE WHY WAS JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS GIVEN A MANDATORY |
The following letter from MARTIN SHAW PANG'S lawyers in the U.S. and Brazil to Lambros proves that the MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE COCAINE in Brazil carries a sentence of THREE (3) to TEN (10) YEARS. Therefore, the Brazilian Supreme Court should of specified that Lambros must not be sentenced to prison for more than TEN (10) YEARS. The U.S. District Court did not follow "The Doctrine of Dual Criminality" either. It appears Lambros, attorneys in Brazil must of obtained there law license within a Cracker Jacks box.
Click here to view STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293 (Wash. 1997) opinion which proves Lambros was not given any type of law in Brazil. This opinion was affirmed by the Supreme Court.
TREATIES DO NOT SUPERSEDE THE CONSTITUTION: By the Constitution of the United States a treaty is made of like obligation as an act of legislation; both are declared to be the supreme law of the land; and NO SUPERIOR EFFICACY IS GIVEN TO EITHER OVER THE OTHER. See, WHITNEY vs. ROBERTSON, 124 US 190, 8 S Ct 456, 31 L Ed. 386 (1888). A treaty CANNOT change the CONSTITUTION or be held valid if in violation thereof. See, BOUDINOT vs. UNITED STATES (The Cherokee Tobacco) 11 Wall 616, 20 L. Ed. 227 and THOMAS vs. GAY, 169 US 264, 18 S. Ct. 340, 42 L. Ed. 740 (1898). When a treaty is inconsistent with a subsequent act of Congress the latter will prevail. See, RAINEY vs. U.S., 232 US 310, 34 S. Ct. 429, 58 L. Ed. 617 (1914). An act of Congress prevails over an earlier treaty so far as they cannot be reasonably harmonized, although an intent to abrogate a treaty will not be lightly attributed to Congress. See, U.S. vs. PAYNE, 264 US 446, 44 S. Ct. 352, 68 L. Ed. 782 (1924). Where the provisions of a treaty and a subsequent act of Congress ARE IN CONFLICT, the Act of Congress WILL CONTROL IN THE COURTS of the United States as the later expression of the municipal law of the United States. See, PIGEON RIVER IMPROV. S. & BOOM CO. vs. CHARLES W. COX, 291 US 138, 54 S. Ct. 361, 78 L. Ed. 695 (1934). Under the Constitution, the treaty power CANNOT OVERRIDE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS RESPECTING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, REID vs. COVERT, 354 US 1, 16-17, 77 S.Ct. 1222 1230, 1 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1957). See, ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK vs. STATE OF N.Y., 860 F.2d 1145, 1163 (2nd Cir. 1988). PLEASE NOTE: The Treaty of Extradition Between the United States of America and the UNITED STATES OF BRAZIL was signed on January 13, 1961, entered into force on December 17, 1964, 15 U.S.T. 2093; T.I.A.S. No. 5691; Additional Protocol to Treaty, signed on June 18, 1962, entered into force on December 17, 1964, 15 U.S.T. 2112; T.I.A.S. No. 5691. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1330 fn. 22, 1334, and 1354 fn. 1 (Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc 1997), cert. denied, 139 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997). In 1964 military leaders of Brazil took control of the Brazilian Government and Brazil's government was returned to civilian rule in 1985. In 1986, Brazilians elected a new Congress and new state legislatures and governors in the FIRST nationwide general election after military rule ended. See, WORLD BOOK ENCYCLOPEDIA, (2002), Volume 2, page 586. The 1988 NEW CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL abolished the president's former power to rule by decree. Legislative power is exercised by the National Congress (Congresso Nacional), which consists of a 487-member Chamber of Deputies (Camara dos Deputados) and a 72-member Senate (Senado). The 1988 NEW CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL provided for direct elections every five years to the country's most powerful political position, the presidency. Brazil's judiciary is headed by a FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, whose 11 members ARE APPOINTED BY THE PRESIDENT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE SENATE. See, THE NEW ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, (1993)(Micropaedia), Vol. 2, page 488. Both ENCYCLOPEDIA'S state that Brazil's OFFICIAL NAME IS: REPUBLICA FEDERATIVO do BRASIL (Federative Republic of Brazil). WHY DOES THE TREATY USE THE NAME "UNITED STATES OF BRAZIL"???? It is clear that the 1988 NEW CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL reaffirmed Article 5, clause XLVII(b), that there will be no life sentence in Brazil and the legal norm consolidated by Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, which limits the maximum prison sentence to thirty (30) years. See, STATE vs. PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1345 and 1352 (This Article limits the prison sentence time, conforming exactly with the present constitutional dictamen, as it was the case with the Constitutions [Brazil] of 1937 (Article 122, 13), 1946 (Article 41 Par. 31 and 1969 Article 153 Par. 1) which prohibited life sentences. Now, if that is the case, how can we give up a constitutional precept in face of a request for the extradition of an individual who one way or another, subjects himself to Brazilian Laws?) Id. at 1345-1346. LAMBROS COULD NOT BE EXTRADITED TO THE UNITED STATES LEGALLY.
DOING BUSINESS IN BRAZIL, by Brazilian Attorney PINHEIRO NETO, (1991) offers an excellent overview into THE BRAZILIAN LEGAL SYSTEM. Attorney PINHEIRO NETO'S book is in english and published by Matthew Bender & Company. Of interest are the following: (1) "In the field of CRIMINAL LAW, the principle IN DUBIO PRO REO (i.e. any doubt shall be resolved in favor of the defendant) has been fully recognized and applied by the courts. See, §1.133; (2) "In the international sphere, the Code of Civil Procedure provides that the Brazilian Courts have jurisdiction when: (i) the defendant, WHATEVER HIS NATIONALITY, IS DOMICILED IN BRAZIL; ..." See, §1.140; (3) "Finally, the Code provides that an action brought before a foreign court does not prevent the Brazilian Courts from hearing the same action and any others connected with it." See, §1.141; (3) "The Federal Constitution enacted on Oct. 5, 1988 has created the Superior Court of Justice, which is, in fact, a third level of ordinary jurisdiction. On April 7, 1989, the Superior Court of Justice was inaugurated and began its activities, as established in Law No. 7746 of March 30, 1989. The Superior Court of Justice will, inter alia, judge at the special appeal level decisions that (i) CONTRAVENE A TREATY OR FEDERAL LAW, OR DENY THE EFFECTIVENESS THEREOF; ...." See, §1.145 (4) "The lower jurisdiction is exercised by the STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS, by the puisne judges who have competence to hear CASES AT FIRST INSTANCE. See, §1.147 IN 1991, JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS WAS NEVER SEEN BY A JUDGE WITHIN A STATE OR FEDERAL COURT IN Rio DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL WHEN HE WAS ARRESTED AND ILLEGALLY TAKEN TO BRASILIA, BRAZIL TO BE TORTURED AND SEEN BY THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT. WHY WAS THE SUPREME COURT THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE???????
Here is the July 17, 1992 (07/17/92) RADIOLOGICAL CONSULTATION REQUEST/REPORT of John Gregory Lambros by the U.S. Bureau Prisons Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota, which states, "In the lateral views there appear to be clusters of punctate radiopaque foreign bodies...."
HERE IS THE JULY 17, 1992 (07/17/92) x-ray of John Gregory Lambros by the U.S. Bureau of Prisons Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota, that shows the clusters of PUNCTATE RADIOPAQUE FOREIGN BODIES. BRAIN CONTROL IMPLANTS.
CLICK HERE to download this x-ray in PDF. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THE X-RAY. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
February
24, 1995 letter from Glen E. Nichols to Attorney Jeffrey L. Orren as
to Mr. Nichols review of John G. Lambros' X-rays dated 07-17-92, and
the other dated 07-27-92. Mr. Nichols states, "However, I saw two
sets of 'clusters of punctate radiopaque foreign bodies.' They were
in two separate clusters; one approximately two (2) inches above and
slightly forward from the ear canal, in the area known as the
AUDITORY AREA of the temporal lobe cerebral cortex; a second cluster
approximately one (1) inch frontal to the above cluster in the area
known as the SPEECH AREA or BROCA'S AREA of the frontal lobe cerebral
cortex. I used a magnification lens, and there appear to be
approximately 10 to 15 radiopaque objects within each cluster, each
object is about 1 millimeter (.039), or less, in diameter. The
objects are clustered in two separate groups and within a diameter
for each group of approximately 1 centimeter (.39 inch). I viewed the
07-17-92 X-ray of John G. Lambros with a Christian minister familiar
with X-ray material. He also saw several identifiable radiopaque
bodies in the two separate clusters in the X-ray." This letter is a
total of two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT
READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY
CLICKING
HERE.
DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 24, 1995, GLEN E. NICHOLS' LETTER TO ATTORNEY ORREN HERE IN PDF.
December
20, 2001, letter from LAMBROS to Glen E. Nichols, regarding the
release of the NICHOLS February 24, 1995 letter. This letter is a
total of two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT
READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SITE BY
CLICKING
HERE.
DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 20, 2001 LAMBROS LETTER TO GLEN E. NICHOLS HERE IN PDF.
April
12, 2002, letter from LAMBROS to Glen E. Nichols, as to his FINAL
NOTICE to Lambros to remove all letters and documents related to
Nichols from the Boycott Brazil web site. Please note that Lambros
requests Nichols to have the Central District of California, U.S.
Attorneys Office to prosecute Lambros for violations of Title 18,
USCA §1001, as to Lambros' willful filing of false statements as
to the X-rays of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons. WHY DOESN'T ANYONE WANT
TO PROSECUTE OR FILE CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST LAMBROS FOR ANYTHING
WITHIN HIS BOYCOTT BRAZIL WEB SITE?? COULD IT POSSIBLY BE THAT ALL
FACTS AND LAW ARE TRUE??? This letter and exhibit is a total of two
(2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT
READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD APRIL 12, 2002 LAMBROS LETTER TO GLEN E. NICHOLS HERE IN PDF.
In 1995, Author Alex Constantine stated within his book PSYCHIC
DICTATORSHIP IN THE U.S.A., "Is it possible, asks John
Lambros, a prisoner at Leavenworth and mind control experimentee
(a claim he corroborates with an X-ray of four strand-shaped foreign
objects in his head) that the particle beam intended for enemy
missiles alone might now be intended for human minds?" See, Page 43.
1 would strongly suggest reading Mr. Constantine's book, as it offers
an excellent overview on mind control technology, "Masers, not
lasers, are the hidden thrust of "Star Wars." The weapon is an
extremely sophisticated mind and body machine capable of thought
transfer, manipulation of emotions and muscle control. Images, even
dreams, can be beamed to the subject. A human or cybernetic
controller can carry on a conversation telepathically, and at the
same time instill physical sensations, subliminal commands, emotions
and visual and aural hallucinations. Computerized EM devices that
talk and transmit images to the brain were current when Reagan
delivered his first SDI pitch in 1983 . . . . The Microwave Mafia
often rely on the implantation of miniaturized radio receivers. The
technique known as intracerebral control and uses radio or
ultra-sound. It was developed by the CIA's MKDRACO and HATTER brain
telemetry projects. The implantation of a micro-receiver in the
frontal or temporal lobes by trained teams of operatives is done with
an encaphalator,' usually through the sinuses of a drugged subject.
But the current state of art in Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control
(RHIC) depends upon 'Personal Radio and Electromagnetic
Frequency Allocation,' or PREMA a frequency unique to the
subject's brain. A 'READING WAND' is hidden near the victim, who is
scanned by an instrument smaller than a briefcase. Once the 'Freak'
is determined,. the brain becomes a link in a cybernetic system, and
the subject (or a group" can communicate, be surveilled, guided,
manipulated, harassed or controlled from afar." See, Pages 43 and 44.
If you would like to review the court ordered January 19, 1994, COMPETENCY EVALUATION OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, which was conducted by Dr. Kenneth J. Criqui, a holder of multiple Ph.D.'s, please click here. Please note that Dr. Criqui stated within his January 19, 1994, "ADDENDUM TO COMPETENCY EVALUATION JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS," on Page 2, "The government could not have done a better job of instilling fear and paranoia in Mr. Lambros had they hired a psychiatrist to plan this out. First Mr. Lambros was sent to FMC Rochester. The FIRST X-RAY SHOWED SOMETHING, AND WHILE THE SECOND SHOWED NOTHING, IT IS PLAIN AND EVIDENT THAT THE SECOND X-RAY WAS TAKEN AT A DIFFERENT INTENSITY SETTING AND IS THEREFORE QUITE INVALID TO C014PARE TO THE FIRST. HOW BETTER TO MAKE THE SUBJECT THINK THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS JUST INVOLVED IN "ANOTHER ONE OF ITS COVER-UPS'?."
UNITED STATES SENATOR CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" INVESTIGATE JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' TORTURE AND EXTRADITION FROM BRAZIL.
THE UNITED STATES SENATE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" HAS JURISDICTION ON ALL UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURTS AND JUDGES. U.S. SENATOR CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY SITS ON THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY."
1. On August 09, 2001 JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS mailed a two (2) page letter and eighty-one (81) page AFFIDAVIT (including exhibits) to United States Senator Charles Ernest Grassley for his review, investigation and presentment to the United States Senate "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." The documents were received by Senator Grassley's office on August 14, 2001. You may download the following documents in PDF FORMAT: a) copy of the U.S. Postal Service Return Receipt confirming U.S. Senator Grassley's receipt of LAMBROS' letter and affidavit on August 14, 2001. This document is one (1) page; b) LAMBROS' August 09, 2001 letter to Senator Grassley. This document is two (2) pages; c) LAMBROS' August 09, 2001, AFFIDAVIT to the United States Senate "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY."
This document is eighty-one (81) pages with exhibits. Please note that LAMBROS has numbered each page of the AFFIDAVIT in long-hand in the lower right hand corner of each page, 1 thru 81, to ensure readers that pages and exhibits don't get mixed-up. CLICK BELOW to view these pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD
AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT TO U.S. SENATOR CHARLES E.
GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF.
The following is a copy of the FIRST PAGE OF LAMBROS' AUGUST 09, 2001 AFFIDAVIT TO THE UNITED STATES SENATE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." Please note the names of those within the coverup.
|
JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, vs. ROBERT G. RENNER, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota and formerly U.S. Attorney for Minnesota from 1969 to 1977; JOSEPH T. WALBRAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota in 1976; GLENN BASKFIELD, U.S. Parole/Probation Officer in the District of Minnesota in 1976; PETER THOMPSON, Private Attorney that represented John G. Lambros in 1976 thru 1979; EDWARD J. DEVITT, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota in 1976; THOMAS B. HEFFELFINGER, U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota in 1992; DOUGLAS R. PETERSON, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota in 1992; AUDREY CARLSON, Employee in the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota on December 17, 1992; CHARLES W. FAULKNER, Private Attorney that represented John G. Lambros in 1992 thru 1994; JAMES L. PROPOTNICK, Deputy U.S. Marshall for the District of Minnesota in 1976; DONALD E. NELSON, Special Agent of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration in 1976 within the District of Minnesota; JAMES P. BRASETH, Special Agent of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration in 1976 within the District of Minnesota; LEON A. CHENEY, Deputy U.S. Marshall for the District of Minnesota in 1976; JOHN DOES, #1 thru 30; JANE DOES, #1 thru 30;, Defendants. |
AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY IN RE: Criminal Indictments and Judgment from the
United States District Court, District of Minnesota, U.S.A.
vs. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS,: This Affidavit is dated: |
|
STATE OF KANSAS COUNTY OF LEAVENWORTH |
SS: AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS |
|
2. March 20, 2002, ADDENDUM TO AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT OF LAMBROS TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES E. GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter is 3 pages with 29 pages of exhibits being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Total of 35 pages)
3. September 20, 2002, SECOND ADDENDUM TO AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES E. GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter is 3 pages with 5 pages of exhibits, total 8 pages, being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE. DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 20, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO U.S. SENATOR GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF. 4. November 25, 2002, letter from Lambros to CHADWICK GROOVER, a staff member of Senator Charles E. Grassley and the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter was written at the request of CHADWICK GROOVER as per his conversation with the Lambros family. This letter is two (2) pages in length with eight (8) pages of exhibits, total of 10 pages, being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE. DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 25, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO CHADWICK GROOVER HERE IN PDF.
|
|
CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS
POST
FREE CLASSIFIED ADS, BUSINESS DIRECTORY LISTING AND YELLOW PAGE LISTING
FOR YOUR BUSINESS - WITHIN 50 COUNTRIES. SEARCHING FOR A SPECIAL ITEM?
SEARCH OVER 35 MILLION CLASSIFIED ADS WITH OVER 500,000 NEW ADS
DAILY!!! Visite: www.NoPayClassifieds.com.
Note: Paddy Mitchell is a strong advocate of John Lambros in his quest to BOYCOTT BRAZIL!
:
www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html
FOR DOCUMENTATION START READING
Press Release: A Blanket of Silence, April, 1996
DOWNLOAD HARLAN GIRARD DOCUMENT IN PDF HERE.
DOWNLOAD ATLANTIS RISING JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2002 ARTICLE IN PDF HERE.
DOWNLOAD DIAGRAMS OF "FIELD CHAIR AND "FIELD CUBE" IN PDF HERE.
DOWNLOAD JOHN FLEMING ARTICLE IN PDF HERE.
DOWNLOAD "BRANDED BY THE SECURITY POLICE" DOCUMENT IN PDF HERE.
DOWNLOAD NAPA SENTINEL ARTICLES BY HARRY V. MARTIN AND DAVID CAUL HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD X-RAY OF PICKERING IMPLANT IN MR. PETIT HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD MARCH 1985 ARTICLE BY CHRISTIAN INQUIRER, HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD "THE CONTROLLERS", HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD PAGES 34, 35, 36, AND 37 FROM UNDERGROUND ALIEN BASES HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD PAGES FROM THE ALIENS AND THE SCALPEL HERE IN PDF.
offers excellent background into implant use in the United States, that starts with Robert Heath's deep brain simulation at Tulane University School of Medicine and moves you through the U.S. Government's funding of Dr. Louis Jolyon West of UCLA who implanted prisoners in California prisons. Today, Medtronic, a Minneapolis-based company uses implants to control Parkinson's patients.DOWNLOAD "WHO HOLDS THE CLICKER?" HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD "MIND OVER MACHINE," BY CARL ZIMMER HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD KEVIN MANEY ARTICLE AND CYBERKINETICS INFORMATION HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD JESSE FREUND ARTICLE "BIONIC EARS" HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 3, 2009 LETTER TO NICHOLAS THOMPSON HERE IN PDF FORMAT.
THE BOYCOTT AGAINST THE PURCHASE AND IMPORTATION OF BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
IS "MAD COW DISEASE" IN BRAZILIAN CATTLE, SHEEP, DEER, ELK, GOATS,
AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS, SUCH AS DAIRY PRODUCTS??? YOU BE THE JUDGE,
AFTER READING THE FOLLOWING!!! AS OF JUNE, 2001 BOTH THE UNITED
STATES AND CANADA HAVE BANNED THE IMPORT OF BRAZILIAN BEEF AND
ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS.
FACT SHEET FOR "MAD COW DISEASE:" (June, 2001)
1. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) - is commonly called MAD COW DISEASE.
2. BSE was first discovered in Britain in 1986.
3.In the past two years, wider screening of cattle have detected BSE in France, Germany, Ireland and other nations.
4. Mad cow and the human form of the disease are always fatal.
5. More than 100 people, mostly in Britain, have died of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).
6. BSE could cripple the $175 billion United States beef industry and disrupt trade balance.
7. Creutzfeldt-Jakob is believed to come from eating tainted beef.
8. With an incubation period that could exceed 40 years in humans, nobody knows how many other people could develop the disease. Once symptoms appear, death follows, usually within months.
9. BSE has led to millions of cattle being destroyed globally.
10. BSE will eat away in human brain tissue and leave sponge-like holes.
11. Testing for BSE in animals examine tissue for PRIONS. Prion-diagnosing tests are used after symptoms appear during late stages of the disease in humans, whose tonsils are tested, or on brain and spinal tissue tissue taken from dead animals.
12. No one has yet developed a blood test that can detect the presence of the disease in its early stages.
13. European countries test all slaughtered cows older than 30 months before they enter the food chain.
14. Prion diseases are transmissible between species and bring about slow degeneration of the central nervous system, which inevitably leads to death. A long period elapses between infection and the appearance of the first clinical symptoms. Typically, it is two to four years in sheep, three to six years in cattle and more than 10 years in humans. Once the symptoms appear, death follows within months. Source: University of Zurich and Prionics AG, Switzerland, May 2001.
15. Canada has banned the import of beef and associated products from Brazil.
16. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service restricts the import of cattle from BSE-infected areas. As an extra precaution, the USDA RECENTLY SUSPENDED THE IMPORT OF BEEF AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS FROM BRAZIL.
17. There are a number a number of web sites posting current, factual data about BSE. You can log on to:
a. USDA's home page at: www.usda.govb. The National Cattlemens Beef Association home page at: www.bseinfo.org
C. The Food and Drug Administrations web site at: www.fda.gov
18. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is attempting to help people understand the BRAZILIAN - "MAD COW" issue. It is essential that all countries suspend the import of BEEF AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS FROM BRAZIL so the Brazilian Government may prove what is fact and what is fiction.
19. DAIRY INDUSTRY: milk, cheese, ice cream, butter, cream, buttermilk, yogurt, chocolate milk, fruit flavored dairy drinks, whipping cream, half-and-half, sour cream.
BY-PRODUCTS OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY: Some by-products of dairy have industrial uses. Lactose, or milk sugar is used in the fermentation process that produces PENICILLIN. Lactose is also a base for pills and used in INFANT FOODS.
BRAZILIAN CORNED BEEF RECALLED OVER INGREDIENTS. The following article by the Associated Press appeared in the Sunday, December 30, 2001, STAR TRIBUNE newspaper. Please e-mail the Agriculture Department in your country and advise them of the recall.
HOW MANY BRAZILIANS HAVE DIED FROM "MAD COW DISEASE"??? As of September 23, 2005, about 150 Britons have died from "MAD COW DISEASE." See, THE WEEK, September 2005, Page 26.
IS BRAZIL
"DUMPING" MANUFACTURED GOODS IN UNITED STATES AT LESS THAN FAIR
MARKET VALUE OF THOSE GOODS IN BRAZIL? MINNESOTA GOVERNOR JESSE
VENTURA THINKS SO!!!!!
a. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION, Austin, Minnesota 55912, Telephone number for questions or comments, please call 1-800-523-4635. Hormel distributes CORNED BEEF that is packed under Brazilian Government Inspection numbers, C.N.P.J. 01.597.168/0013-22, EST. 337.b. June 2, 2001, letter from LAMBROS to HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION regarding why Hormel Foods is selling "CORNED BEEF" in the can that is produced in BRAZIL when CANADA has BANNED ALL BRAZILIAN BEEF IN THE CAN due to FOOT-AND- MOUTH DISEASE in Brazil. This letter is two (2) pages in length and includes three (3) exhibits. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER NAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD THE JUNE 2, 2001 LETTER TO HORMEL FOODS IN PDF HERE.
c. SAMPCO INC., President David Morrison, President, Suite 3700, 221 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60601. As of April 2002 Sampco Inc. was importing 150 - 40 foot containers of Brazilian meat per month from Bertin Ltd., a meatpacker in the heart of Brazil's cattle country. Attached for your review is Lambros' April 10, 2002 and June 1, 2002 letters in PDF FORMAT to David Morrison, President of Sampco Inc. as to Lambros' torture and boycott of Brazilian products. Mr. Morrison HAS NOT responded to Lambros as of July 20, 2002. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD SAMPCO INC. CORRESPONDENCE HERE IN PDF.
d. CARGILL INC., the Minnesota based multinational has more than 120 plants, warehouses, port terminals and farms in Brazil. It counts more than 90 buying stations and employs more than 5,000 people. Cargill is currently assisting in financing the paving of roads from Cuiaba, a city within MATO GROSSO, Brazil to the Amazon River port SANTAREM to ship SOYBEANS. The distance is equivalent to trucking soybeans from Minneapolis to New Orleans. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, METRO EDITION. Cargill opened a new export terminal in April 2003 in SANTAREM, Brazil to export soybeans. Brazil is expected to convert 50 million acres to crops by 2014. That's an area the size of Minnesota, and most will be new soybeans. STAR TRIBUNE newspaper.
e. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND, Illinois-based is also a major player in farming, warehousing and financing the paving of roads from Cuiaba, Brazil to the Amazon River port SANTAREM to ship SOYBEANS. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE article.
f. BUNGE, New York-based, is a major player in farming, warehousing and financing the paving of roads from Cuiaba, Brazil to the Amazon River port SANTAREM to ship SOYBEANS. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE article.
g. JOHN DEERE. John Deere tractors can be found all over Brazil. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE article.
DOWNLOAD MARCH 7, 2004, ARTICLE "THE NEW BREADBASKET" HERE IN PDF.
h. CUTRALE GROUP: Brazil's secretive "ORANGE KING", is owned by 68 year old Jose Luis Cutrale (coo-TRAH-lee), one of Brazil's wealthiest men. The family owned orange juice giant owns a juicing operation in Portugal and is ONE OF THE BIGGEST PLAYERS IN FLORIDA. In fact, CUTRALE has faced dozens of violations of workplace safety regulations in the U.S., since buying two (2) former Minute Maid juice plants in Florida in 1997. The company has been cited for 42 "SERIOUS" violations at factories and seven repeat violations by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, paying out $122,765 in settlements. Brazilian labor prosecutors say they have opened 286 investigations into Cutrale's labor practices since 1997, resulting in dozens of lawsuits. Prosecutors have investigated the company for a variety of potential violations, including using SLAVE LABOR AND SHELTERING PICKERS IN INHUMANE CONDITIONS. In JULY 2014, about 30 migrant orange pickers from northern Brazil accused CUTRALE of making them work 12-hour days, HOUSING UP TO 17 PEOPLE IN ONE ROOM, INDEBTING THEM TO A COMPANY STORE AND THEN FIRING THEM WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION. The company didn't acknowledge wrongdoing but agreed to pay rent, debts to the store and transportation costs. CUTRALE is one of three (3) companies operating in Brazil THAT ACCOUNT FOR ABOUT 80% OF GLOBAL ORANGE-JUICE EXPORTS. . CUTRALE exported $1.7 billion from Brazil in 2013. CUTRALE is Brazil's number 2 producer of orange-juice, behind Brazil-based CITROSUCO and ahead of French trading conglomerate LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES. See, Wall Street Journal, August 15, 2014, "ORANGE KING'S NEWEST DESIRE: BANANAS", by Paul Kiernan and Rogerio Jelmayer.
i. JBS SA: JBS SA is a Brazilian meat processor who is owned by a pair of Brazilian brothers who aim to dominate the global meat business - Wesley and Joesley Batista. Wesley is the CE0 and runs the meat packing operation and Joesley is president of JBS's board in charge of finance. JBS has a market value of $9.9 billion in 2013. JBS has acquired the following companies: Swift (beef & port in 2007); Inaica (beef in 2007)(50% stake); Smithfield Beef (2008); Pilgrim's Pride (chicken 2009)(64% stake); Bertin (beef 2009); and Seara Brasil (chicken and pork 2013). Sounds like a way to put American farmers out of business. See, Wall Street Journal, June 4, 2014, "FOR BRAZILIAN BEEF DUO, A SWIFT RISE", by Jacob Bunge and David Kesmodel.
PRICE--COMPARIS0N SEARCH ENGINE AND LEGITIMATE ESCROW SERVICE
ALLOWS YOU VALID OPTIONS SO YOU MAY BOYCOTT AGAINST THE PURCHASE AND
IMPORTATION OF BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
froogle.google.com --Google's new price-comparison engine (2003), Froogle, will peek into the remote corners of the world and web for the best prices on the products you now purchase from Brazil. Search for any imaginable item that Brazil currently exports and beat the price. Hone your hunt using the Advanced Search page, where you can limit hits to products within a certain price range or in a particular category - tremendously helpful in zooming in on your dream deal.
www.escrow.com --Boycott Brazil recommends using escrow.com, which was the first online escrow business certified under California's escrow laws, the United States most stringent, to protect all selling and buying of products on the internet.
www.transrow.com --In addition to relying on a legitimate escrow service, you might try a service like Transrow, which helps sellers (mostly for high-end transactions) verify bidders by requiring them to deposit funds or submit a driver's license and credit reference.
www.sos4auctions.com --This site offers clues for spotting scam escrow web sites as more than a hundred have popped up in 2002.
www.bbbonline.org --The Better Business Bureau is another excellent place to visit to check a credit reference.
BOYCOTT BRAZIL WILL STOP CHILD SLAVERY ON BRAZILIAN COCOA
FARMS
On October 1, 2001, Sumana Chatterjee, published the article "COCOA INDUSTRY TO FIGHT SLAVERY." The article offers an excellent overview on cocoa farmers enslaving children in the Ivory Coast, a West African nation that supplies 43 percent of U.S. cocoa, the raw ingredient of chocolate. BRAZIL is the second largest supplier of Cocoa in the world. Boycott Brazil is requesting your assistance in contacting your local grocery store and the World Cocoa Foundation in boycotting BRAZILIAN COCOA due to child slavery and other forms of exploitation by Brazilian cocoa farmers. This article is two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD "COCOA INDUSTRY TO FIGHT SLAVERY" ARTICLE IN PDF.
BRAZIL'S SHOE INDUSTRY "CHILD LABOR" AND "HIGH IMPORT DUTIES"
DOWNLOAD 1994 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT FOR BRAZIL HERE IN PDF.
JURUA REGION OF BRAZIL
BOLIVIA IS FREE OF INCOME AND CAPITAL GAINS TAXES
ASTROTURF SINISTER SEAWEED LIKELY TO INVADE WATERS IN BRAZIL -
WITH NO BAN.
CAULERPA TAXIFOLIA, a beautiful but sinister seaweed has taken over the Mediterranean Sea in the last few years, choking corals, blanketing sandy bottoms and fouling fisherman's nets. Environmentalists fear that it couldinvade waters in BRAZIL, where it is presently confined to tanks in aquarium stores and fish collectors' homes. Once the CAULERPA TAXIFOLIA is in home aquariums, the weed could easily make it into the wild. Many aquarium owners dump the contents into local waterways, under the mistaken impression that they are "freeing" the plants and animals.
The seaweed in question has been compared to living Astroturf because of its carpet-like growth. The original Caulerpa lives in the Red Sea. But the form that is spreading was bred in European aquariums. It was released into the Mediterranean by the aquarium in Monaco and now covers tens of thousands of acres off the coasts of Italy and France.
Wherever Caulerpa grows, scientists say, nothing else does. It smothers all other sea life. Fisherman working in affected sites haul up nets full of Caulerpa and little more. Almost nothing can get rid of the weed. "They tried warm water, they tried copa (coconut fiber), they tried salt," says Alexandre Meinesz of the University of Nice. The Caulerpa always grows back. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against importing anything that is dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban of Caulerpa Taxifolia into Brazil.
MOLD OVERWHELMS BRAZIL - PROBLEMS GROW IN HOTELS, APARTMENTS,
OFFICES, AND SHOPS
The fungal growth, found in damp or wet conditions, has been blamed for a number of health problems, including breathing difficulties, headaches, nausea, gastrointestinal ailments, skin rashes, severe allergic reactions and neurological damage. The United States incurred over $1.3 billion in home-owner's insurance claims in 2001 due to mold-related expense costs, says the Insurance Information Institute, a New York-based trade group. The problem being most severe in California and Texas.
In July 2002, the Hilton Hotels Corp. shut down one of six towers that comprise the Hilton Hawaiian Village in Waikiki after investigators discovered mold. As of December 2002, Hilton has taken charges totaling $20 million for cleanup. A spokesman says the 454 guest rooms in the 25-story tower would remain closed for at least six more months.
In August 2002, KDF North Hills, Orange County, California paid $900,000.00 to a mother and her three children after their mold-infested rental apartment made them sick.
BOYCOTT BRAZIL is requesting all buyers and rental tenants of property in Brazil to add MOLD INSPECTION as part of the industry's due-diligence process before taking on a transaction. Buyers/renters need to (1) watch for clues on property tours such as leaks, wet spots, condensation and stains or musty odors; (2) ask property managers, engineers and occupants about MOLD; (3) obtain copies of all existing indoor air quality and mold reports; (4) consider performing a MOLD survey if warning signs exist; and (5) review property and casualty insurance, watch for mold and environmental exclusions.
--BUGLER NEWS SERVICE quoting www.brazilboycott.org
TAMARISK - SALT CEDAR TREE - SOAKS MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF WATER AND CROWDS OUT NATIVE PLANT LIFE IN BRAZIL
-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE, quoting www.brazilboycott.org
BEDBUGS (Cimex lectularius) SUCK THE BLOOD OF SLEEPING BRAZILIANS AND TOURISTS IN BRAZIL
-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE, quoting www.brazilboycott.org
KUDZU - INVADING BRAZIL AT A FOOT A DAY
-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE (2011).
PIGWEED - INVADING BRAZIL
Brazil needs to outlaw the use of propazine. The controversial herbicide is being exported within foods and posing risks to citizens around the world.-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE (2015).
RED-TIDE POSSIBLY LINGERING ALONG BRAZIL'S 4,500 MILE ATLANTIC COASTLINE.
4,500 BRAZILIAN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS DEPORTED BY THE UNITED STATES IN
2004 BY PLANE - MOST NOT INFORMED OF RIGHT TO CONTACT BRAZILIAN
CONSULATE. See, USA TODAY, "ILLEGALS GOING BACK BY THE PLANELOAD,"
February 17, 2005.
If you are a Brazilian criminal in the USA illegally or an illegal Brazilian immigrant who has committed no crimes other than violations of visa limits and other immigration laws in the USA, you must contact the Brazilian Consulate in the USA so the Consul may advise you as to your legal rights. The arresting authority will also appoint you an attorney at no cost if you do not have money. Therefore, you are receiving legal assistance from both the Brazilian Consul and an attorney.
IMPORTANT: If you don't assert your right under the Vienna Convention to have the arresting authority contact the Brazilian Consulate to provide you with FREE LEGAL ADVICE, you default on any claims. Boycott Brazil believes Brazilian's and the legal authority that arrests them in the USA have an excellent claim in bringing suit against Brazil if the Brazilian Consulate REFUSES to visit the jailed Brazilian, alleging a denial of rights under the Vienna Convention.
SNAKEHEAD FISH LIKELY TO INVADE AMAZON RIVER IN BRAZIL - WITH NO BAN.
Boycott Brazil has been informed by sources in Brazil that anglers
caught one of twenty-eight species of snakehead in the waters of the
Amazon River that flows into the Atlantic Ocean. The Amazon River flows
a thousand miles upstream from Manaus, Brazil into the Atlantic Ocean.
The snakehead is a non-native hardy fish native to China that can
travel on land and eat so much that it can destroy an ecosystem. In
2002, the United States Department of the Interior banned the import of
28 species of snakehead fish. Brazil's largest lakes, Mirim
(Brazil-Uruguay), Patos (actually lagoons), and major rivers, Amazon,
Madeira, Negro, Para, Parana, Sao Francisco, are in danger of the
invasive snakehead fish. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against importing anything
that is dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban of
snakehead fish into Brazil. COMMERCIAL SHIPPING DUMPING INVASIVE SPECIES INTO AMAZON RIVER IN BRAZIL
June 2004, Boycott Brazil has just received a report that oceangoing
vessels have been dumping invasive species of fish into the Amazon
River through ballast tanks that may contain 2 million gallons of
water, as the vessel takes on grain or other cargo. The invaders
include Sea Lamprey (Atlantic Ocean); Round Goby (Black and Caspian
seas); Quagga Mussels (Black and Caspian seas); Spiny Water Flea
(Northern Europe and Russia); Zebra Mussels (Western Russia near
Caspian Sea and Europe). BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against anything dangerous
to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban on the above listed
invasive species into Brazil.
RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL SAND IS A PETRI DISH OF BACTERIA - BACTERIA MAY
LINGER WITHIN ALL THE SAND OF BRAZIL'S 4,500 MILE ATLANTIC COASTLINE.
DECEMBER 3, 2015:
The water around Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. is worse than the world
thought, as it prepares for the 2016 Summer Olympics. USA TODAY warns
sailors, rowers, canoeists and open-water swimmers to beware of the
existing viruses and bacteria, as the water in Rio is more contaminated
by sewage than previously known. Again, Brazilians do not keep the
promise and pledge to clean up its water-ways by improving sanitation
for the Olympics. See, December 3, 2015, USA TODAY, article "BROKEN
PROMISES, Like Other Olympic hosts, Rio Fails to deliver on vows," by
Christine Brennan.
Contaminated
water closes beaches but it is the sand that typically harbors the
bacteria within Rio de Janeiro's beach sand. Because microbes can
survive longer in Rio's sand, they could pose more health risk than
water-borne bacteria. Studies within the U.S. have usually shown sand
has levels of bacteria five to 10 times higher than water, says Clean
Beaches Council president Walter McLeod. In 2003, studies found
bacteria levels in sand at freshwater beaches in Chicago averaged up to
10 times that of swimming water and the sand had to be replaced.
BOYCOTT BRAZIL is alerting all parents of children who use the beaches
in Rio de Janeiro to tell kids to keep hands out of their mouths while
digging in the sand and that everyone wash hands thoroughly after a day
at the shore.
