September 27, 2005, "MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER, DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, U.S. vs. BOOKER, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (January 12, 2005), UNDER ANY ONE OF THREE SEPARATE SUBSECTIONS OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) - SECTIONS ONE (1), FIVE (5), AND SIX (6)." This document is a total of seventeen (17) pages including cover letter and exhibits in LAMBROS vs. USA, Criminal File No. 4-89-82(5), District of Minnesota. This document is in PDF FORMAT and numbered in the lower right hand corner to assist readers. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
Boycott Brazil
PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THE ABOVE LOGO ON YOUR SITE AND THROUGHOUT THE INTERNET.
Thank you for your support.
The Extradition, Torture and
Electronic Mind Control
of U.S. Citizen
John Gregory Lambros,
a Native of MinnesotaGo directly to a third-party explanation of
what happened to John Gregory Lambros.What's new?
October 26, 2022: Petitioner John Lambros contacted the law office of Foley Hoag LLP, who represents Brazil within the Supreme Court of the United States, JOHN LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, Civil Action Number: 22-5604. The Supreme Court Clerk mailed John Lambros notice that Brazil's BRIEF IN OPPOSITION was due on Wednesday October 19, 2022. On Monday, October 24, 2022 Lambros spoke with the clerk of the Supreme court to check if a response by Foley Hoag LLP - Brazil was filed to John Lambros’ Writ of Certiorari, the clerk stated NO RESPONSE WAS FILED. Therefore, Brazil chooses NOT TO RESPOND. Questions? Has Brazil conceded to John Lambros’ issues raised? Will the case be remanded back to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia to proceed with Judge Pan's ORDER on April 8, 2019 and May 15, 2019 granting Petitioner John Lambros' "MOTION REQUESTING ENTRY OF DEFAULT". See, Lockhart vs. CADE, 728 A.2d 65 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, March 4, 1999)("entry of default 'operates as an admission by the defaulting party that there are NO ISSUES OF LIABILITY, but leaves the issue of damages unresolved until entry of judgment'"). Therefore, John Lambros would have no further obligation to prove liability. Question? - is this now a winner winner chicken dinner for BILLIONS OF US DOLLARS to John Lambros? What will the TAX PAYERS of Brazil be saying about the Brazilian Supreme Court legal ruling allowing John Lambros to be extradited to the United States when the only sentence he could receive and did receive was a MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE. Brazil does not have LIFE SENTENCES - 30 YEAR MAXIMUM - CONSPIRACY FOR DRUGS IS TEN (10) YEAR MAXIMUM - A SENTENCE JOHN LAMBROS SHOULD OF RECEIVED. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution. John Lambros was sentenced by Brazil to a MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE!
September 14, 2022: Petitioner John Lambros files his “Petition For Writ of Certiorari” - total of two (2) questions - within the Supreme Court of the United States , JOHN LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, Civil Action Number: 22-5604. The “Petition For Writ of Certiorari” is 42 pages in length and the “Appendices and Exhibits” is 58 pages in PDF Format.
June 13, 2022: Appellant - Plaintiff John Lambros files his “Petition For Rehearing En Banc” - total of three (3) issues - within the United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia, JOHN LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, Civil Action Number: 21-7121. This "PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC" is 20 pages in length, with an one (1) page exhibit - a total of 21 pages in PDF Format.
April 2, 2022: Appellant - Plaintiff John Lambros files his “REPLY BRIEF” to Brazil’s Attorney’s - Foley Hoag LLP - objections to Lambros’ Appeal within the United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia, JOHN LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, Civil Action Number: 21-7121. The “REPLY BRIEF” is 16 pages in length, with twenty-three (23) pages of exhibits - a total of 39 pages in PDF Format.
February 3, 2022: Appellant - Plaintiff John Lambros files his “APPEAL BRIEF” - total of four (4) issues - within the United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia, JOHN LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, Civil Action Number: 21-7121. This "APPEAL BRIEF" is 65 pages in length, with thirty (30) pages of exhibits - a total of 95 pages in PDF Format.
November 12, 2021: Appellant - Plaintiff Lambros files his “STATEMENT OF ISSUES TO BE RAISED” - total of six (6) issues - within the United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action Number: 21-7121. The Appeals court filed Appellant Lambros “Notice of Appeal” on October 28, 2021 and Ordered several documents to be filed. This "MOTION" is a total of 4 pages in PDF Format.
June 24, 2021: PLAINTIFF Lambros files, “PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al.:
“MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS
THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(E)” Filed on June 14, 2021 (Document # 39, 39-1 and 39-3)AND
“SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(E)” Filed on June 15, 2021 (Document # 40, 40-1 and 40-2)” within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 8 pages in length, with zero (0) pages of exhibits - a total of 8 pages in PDF Format.
“MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(E)” Filed on
June 14, 2021 (Document # 39, 39-1 and 39-3)AND
“SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(E)” Filed on June 15, 2021 (Document # 40, 40-1 and 40-2)”
This "MOTION" is 8 pages in length, with zero (0) pages of exhibits - a total of 8 pages in PDF Format.
May 27, 2021: PLAINTIFF Lambros files, “ADDENDUM TO MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 59(e)”, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 9 pages in length, with five (5) pages of exhibits - a total of 14 pages in PDF Format.
May 25, 2021: PLAINTIFF Lambros files, “MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 59(e)”, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 13 pages in length, with fourteen (14) pages of exhibits - a total of 27 pages in PDF Format.
April 6, 2021: APPELLANT - PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ “OBJECTIONS” TO APPELLEES UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. “BRIEF OF APPELLEES” - FILED ON MARCH 29, 2021, Case No. 20-3672 - To the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Lambros requests the Court to respond to the following QUESTION: “WHETHER APPELLE UNITED STATES, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS AND U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION ARE ENTITLED TO ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY IN THE ABSENCE OF ALL JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER. See, STUMP vs. SPERKMAN, 435 U.S. 349, 356-357 (1978). WHEN THEY BROKE THE LAW BY VIOLATING THE PROVISIONS OF THE “EXTRADITION TREATY” BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND BRAZIL AND CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED IN THE EXTRADITION DECREE BY THE SUPREME COURT OF BRAZIL, WHICH APPROVED THE EXTRADITION REQUEST PRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES - - A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW PURSUANT TO THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE. See, U.S. CONSTITUTION, Art.. VI.” This is a $20 Million TORT CLAIM against the United States of America and the Federal Bureau of Prisons within the The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, Civil Action No. 0:19-cv-01870. Movant Lambros was arrested and locked-up on August 21, 1989, parole violation warrant ILLEGALLY by United States of America DEA Agent TERRYL ANDERSON IN BRAZIL ON MAY 17, 1991. Within the United States, after extradition on another offense, Lambros was detained within the United States Bureau of Prisons after producing documents - on or about April 6, 1994 - from the U.S. Department of State and the Brazilian Supreme Court that Movant was not extradited from Brazil on the August 21,1989 parole violation warrant. APPELLANT LAMBROS’ OBJECTIONS are 17 pages in length with 1 page of exhibits, a total of 18 pages in PDF Format.
March 29, 2021: “BRIEF OF APPELLEES” UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. - FILED ON MARCH 29, 2021, Case No. 20-3672 - To the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. U.S. requests the Court to DENY John Lambros’ QUESTION: “WHETHER APPELLE UNITED STATES, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS AND U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION ARE ENTITLED TO ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY IN THE ABSENCE OF ALL JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER. See, STUMP vs. SPERKMAN, 435 U.S. 349, 356-357 (1978). WHEN THEY BROKE THE LAW BY VIOLATING THE PROVISIONS OF THE “EXTRADITION TREATY” BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND BRAZIL AND CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED IN THE EXTRADITION DECREE BY THE SUPREME COURT OF BRAZIL, WHICH APPROVED THE EXTRADITION REQUEST PRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES - - A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW PURSUANT TO THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE. See, U.S. CONSTITUTION, Art.. VI.” This is a $20 Million TORT CLAIM against the United States of America and the Federal Bureau of Prisons within the The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, Civil Action No. 0:19-cv-01870. Movant Lambros was arrested and locked-up on August 21, 1989, parole violation warrant ILLEGALLY by United States of America DEA Agent TERRYL ANDERSON IN BRAZIL ON MAY 17, 1991. Within the United States, after extradition on another offense, Lambros was detained within the United States Bureau of Prisons after producing documents - on or about April 6, 1994 - from the U.S. Department of State and the Brazilian Supreme Court that Movant was not extradited from Brazil on the August 21,1989 parole violation warrant. APPELLEES RESPONSE BRIEF is 41 pages in length, a total of 41 pages in PDF Format.
January 12, 2021: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ APPEAL TO THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, Case No. 20-3672 - FILED ON JANUARY 12, 2021. Lambros requests the Court to respond to the following QUESTION: “WHETHER APPELLE UNITED STATES, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS AND U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION ARE ENTITLED TO ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY IN THE ABSENCE OF ALL JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER. See, STUMP vs. SPERKMAN, 435 U.S. 349, 356-357 (1978). WHEN THEY BROKE THE LAW BY VIOLATING THE PROVISIONS OF THE “EXTRADITION TREATY” BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND BRAZIL AND CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED IN THE EXTRADITION DECREE BY THE SUPREME COURT OF BRAZIL, WHICH APPROVED THE EXTRADITION REQUEST PRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES - - A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW PURSUANT TO THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE. See, U.S. CONSTITUTION, Art.. VI.” This is a $20 Million TORT CLAIM against the United States of America and the Federal Bureau of Prisons within the The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, Civil Action No. 0:19-cv-01870. Movant Lambros was arrested and locked-up on August 21, 1989, parole violation warrant ILLEGALLY by United States of America DEA Agent TERRYL ANDERSON IN BRAZIL ON MAY 17, 1991. Within the United States, after extradition on another offense, Lambros was detained within the United States Bureau of Prisons after producing documents - on or about April 6, 1994 - from the U.S. Department of State and the Brazilian Supreme Court that Movant was not extradited from Brazil on the August 21,1989 parole violation warrant. APPELLANT LAMBROS’ APPEAL is 39 pages in length with 13 pages of exhibits, a total of 52 pages in PDF Format.
December 7, 2020: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS' OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al. attorney's law firm FOLEY HOAG LLP, "MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT" - FILED ON NOVEMBER 24, 2020, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 19 pages in length, with six (6) pages of exhibits - a total of 25 pages in PDF Format.
December 4, 2020: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT’S FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al. attorney’s law firm FOLEY HOAG LLP, “MOTION TO STAY LOCAL CIVIL RULE 16.3 REQUIREMENTS” - FILED ON NOVEMBER 24, 2020, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 8 pages in length, with eleven (11) pages of exhibits - a total of 19 pages in PDF Format.
September 30, 2020: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ files “MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 59(e)” in response to the “ORDER” by Honorable Judge Davis granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss this action on September 11, 2020. This is a $20 Million TORT CLAIM against the United States of America and the Federal Bureau of Prisons within the the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, Civil Action No. 0:19-cv-01870. Movant Lambros was arrested and locked-up on August 21, 1989, parole violation warrant ILLEGALLY by United States of America DEA Agent TERRY L ANDERSON IN BRAZIL ON MAY 17, 1991. Within the United States, after extradition on another offense, Lambros was detained within the United States Bureau of Prisons after producing documents - on or about April 6, 1994 - from the U.S. Department of State and the Brazilian Supreme Court that Movant was NOT extradited from Brazil on the August 21,1989 parole violation warrant. Lambros’ requested Judge Davis to reconsider his findings, as the Defendants DID NOT have “ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY”, as they acted with “COMPLETE ABSENCE OF ALL JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER”, when they violated the provisions of the extradition treaty between the United States and Brazil. See, STUMP vs. SPERKMAN, 435 U.S. 349, 356-357 (1978). PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ OBJECTIONS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE Davis’ “ORDER” is 11 pages in length with 4 pages of exhibits, in PDF Format.
August 3, 2020: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ RESPONSE TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH WRIGHT’S “REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION”, FILED: JULY 20, 2020. This is a $20 Million TORT CLAIM against the United States of America and the Federal Bureau of Prisons within the The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, Civil Action No. 0:19-cv-01870. Movant Lambros was arrested and locked-up on August 21, 1989, parole violation warrant ILLEGALLY by United States of America DEA Agent TERRY L ANDERSON IN BRAZIL ON MAY 17, 1991. Within the United States, after extradition on another offense, Lambros was detained within the United States Bureau of Prisons after producing documents - on or about April 6, 1994 - from the U.S. Department of State and the Brazilian Supreme Court that Movant was not extradited from Brazil on the August 21,1989 parole violation warrant. Lambros’ “ PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ OBJECTIONS TO THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATE JUDGE WRIGHT’S PROPOSED FINDING WITHIN THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS”, is 17 pages in length with 25 pages of exhibits, in PDF Format.
DOWNLOAD LAMBROS’ AUGUST 3, 2020, RESPONSE TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH WRIGHT’S “REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION”, FILED: JULY 20, 2020. This is a TORT CLAIM for $20 Million Dollars. - 42 TOTAL PAGES IN PDF FORMAT HERE.
March 2, 2020: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S’ “MOTION TO DISMISS”, DATED: February 19, 2020. This is a $20 Million TORT CLAIM against the United States of America and the Federal Bureau of Prisons within the The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, Civil Action No. 0:19-cv-01870. Movant Lambros was arrested and locked-up on the August 21, 1989, parole violation warrant ILLEGALLY by United States of America DEA Agent TERRYL ANDERSON IN BRAZIL ON MAY 17, 1991. Within the United States, after extradition on another offense, Lambros was detained within the United States Bureau of Prisons after producing documents - on or about April 6, 1994 - from the U.S. Department of State and the Brazilian Supreme Court that Movant was not extradited from Brazil on the August 21,1989 parole violation warrant. This "MOTION" is 15 pages in length in PDF Format. Paragraph 28, proves Lambros’ rights have been violated, “The requested state - Brazil - retains an interest in the fate of a person whom it has extradited, so that if, for example, he is tried for an offense other than the one for which he was extradited, or is given a punishment more severe than the one applicable at the time of the request for extradition, the rights of the requested state, as well as the person, are violated. See, Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Laws of Nations, Ch. 7, at 557-58.
OCTOBER 4, 2019: Lambros files: “PLAINTIFF LAMBROS REQUESTS COURT “ORDER” TO ATTEND ALL PRETRIAL, SETTLEMENT, OR STATUS CONFERENCES BY TELEPHONE OR AUDIO-VIDEO CONNECTION. PLAINTIFF IS PROCEEDING PRO SE AND FORMA PAUPERIS AND IS ON FEDERAL SUPERVISED RELEASE, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. The information and exhibits within this filing contains one (1) exhibit that will assist the court. This "MOTION" is 2 pages in length, with one (1) set of exhibits - total of 3 pages in PDF Format.
AUGUST 20, 2019: Lambros files: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ OFFERING CLARIFICATION OF FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN DEFENDANTS “OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S ‘OFFERING OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE LIMITED TO ISSUES RAISED BY DEFENDANTS’ [SIC]”. FILED ON AUGUST 12, 2019, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. The information and exhibits within this filing contains three (3) exhibits that will assist the court. This "MOTION" is 4 pages in length, with three (3) sets of exhibits - total of 10 pages in PDF Format.
AUGUST 12, 2019: Lambros files “MOTION REQUESTING COURT TO ORDER DEFENDANTS TO POST A SURETY BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF “THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO BILLION, FORTY MILLION DOLLARS” ($362,040,000,000.00) DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE REMOVAL OF CLAIMS FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO THIS FEDERAL COURT. PLAINTIFF LAMBROS IS BEING PREJUDICED AS THE NONMOVING PARTY IN THIS REMOVAL PROCESS, AS TO HIS LOSSES SUSTAINED AS A RESULT OF BEING FORCED TO FORGO EXECUTION OF DAMAGE AWARDS ON JUDGMENT ON JULY 5, 2019, WITHIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA”, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. The information and exhibits within this filing contains three (3) exhibits that will assist the court. Defendants’ law firm, FOLEY HOAG LLP, filed a “CIVIL COVER SHEET” on June 27, 2019, stating the DEMAND FOR DAMAGES ARE “THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO BILLION, FORTY MILLION DOLLARS” ($362,040,000,000.00). See, EXHIBIT A. (This amount is for surety bond requirements). This "MOTION" is 7 pages in length, with three (3) sets of exhibits - total of 13 pages in PDF Format.
JULY 29, 2019: Lambros files “PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ OFFERING OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE LIMITED TO ISSUES RAISED BY DEFENDANTS”, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. The information and exhibits within this filing contains five (5) exhibits that will assist the Court that proper service under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) was followed during the service of process on Defendants. Defendants’ law firm, FOLEY HOAG LLP, is attempting to HOODWINK the court that Plaintiff Lambros did not file service of his complaint and summons on the defendants. Lambros includes the DOCKET SHEET from the Brazilian Court proving all Defendants where served. See, EXHIBIT D. This "MOTION" is 12 pages in length, with a five (5) sets of exhibits - total of 27 pages in PDF Format.
JULY 12, 2019: Lambros files response to Brazil’s attorneys - FOLEY HOAG LLP - “MOTION OF DEFENDANTS THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL TO SET ASIDE THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT”, filed on July 5, 2019. This motion was filed within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929(TSC). Of interest in this motion is Foley Hoag LLP attempt to HOODWINK the federal court in believing that Lambros has failed to serve Brazil and Rio de Janeiro in this action, when UPS confirmed defendants receipt of the complaint on October 6, 2017 and court documents from both defendants show Letter of Rogatory number filings - 12537 and 12540 - to each defendant regarding SERVING OF PROCESS. See, Paragraphs 24 thru 37 and EXHIBIT A. (“MARCELO MELLO MARTINS, State Prosecutor stated within his one (1) page document dated April 18, 2018, “The State of Rio de Janeiro, in the case of Letter Rogatory 12537, comes respectfully to request that the attached document be added to it and to reiterate for the exequatur to be denied. Also, “Given the defendant duplicity, two letters rogatory were issued, one SERVING PROCESS ON THE STATE, AND THE OTHER SERVING PROCESS ON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.” “The letter SERVING PROCESS ON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS NUMBER 12540; AND THAT OF THE STATE IS NUMBER 12537.” See, EXHIBIT A.). This "MOTION" is twenty-three (23) pages in length, with a one (1) page exhibit - total of 24 pages in PDF Format.
JULY 5, 2019: Lambros files response to Brazil’s attorneys - FOLEY HOAG LLP - Motion entitled, “NOTICE OF REMOVAL” filed on June 27, 2019. This motion was filed within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929(TSC). Defendants attorneys believe they have the right to not obey Title 28 USC 1446(b), which only allows Notice of removal to be filed within 30 days after defendants receive an initial pleading - complaint. Defendants received Lambros initial pleading - complaint on OCTOBER 6, 2017 (UPS INTERNATIONAL CONFIRMED SERVICE OF PLEADINGS WERE RECEIVED BY THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE IN BRASILIA, BRAZIL). Therefore, Defendants waited Twenty-one (21) months after receiving copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claims for relief, before filing Notice of Removal on June 27, 2019. This is 20 months more than 28 USC 1446(b) allows. Also, Defendant do not understand that the U.S. District Court DOES NOT have SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION! Again, this Plaintiff believes the U.S. District Court DOES NOT have jurisdiction, as the Superior Court entered DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANTS ON APRIL 8, 2019, AND ORDERED AN “Ex Parte Proof Hearing” (Damage Hearing) ON MAY 15, 2019. See, LOCKHART vs. CADE, 728 A.2d 65 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, March 4, 1999)(“entry of default ‘operates as an admission by the defaulting party that there are no issues of liability, but leaves the issue of damages unresolved until entry of judgment’”) Plaintiff Lambros has no further obligation to prove Liability. This "MOTION" is nine (9) pages in length, with seven (7) pages of exhibits - total of 16 pages in PDF Format.
MAY 25, 2018: Lambros files lawsuit against United States of America and U.S. Bureau of Prisons for FALSE IMPRISONMENT of John Gregory Lambros for violating the "RULE OF SPECIALITY" contained in the Treaty between the United States of America and Brazil, pursuant to Lambros' extradition. Lambros requests $20 million in compensatory damages due to his illegal arrest and incarceration on the August 21, 1989, U.S. Parole Commission Warrant. Please note that the U.S. Parole Commission ADMITS TO THE "RULE OF SPECIALITY" VIOLATION ON FEBRUARY 27, 2018 and released Lambros immediately from custody on the parole violation charges. See, EXHIBIT I. The May 25, 2018, FEDERAL TORT CLAIM ACT ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. 2401-02; 2411-12; and 2671-80 et seq. "COMPLAINT", filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Division, - LAMBROS vs, USA and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DOCKET NO. 1:18-cv-13128. The complaint is 24 pages in length with an additional 110 pages of EXHIBITS. TOTAL OF 134 PAGES IN PDF FORMAT.
APRIL 5, 2018: BOYCOTT BRAZIL SUPPORTERS press release to "Brazilian taxpayers paying $15,000.00 a day due to mistake by Supreme Court of Brazil during extradition 'ORDER'.” Two page release with two pages of exhibits in PDF FORMAT.
MARCH 21, 2018: Lambros informs court of U.S. Parole Commission, NOTICE OF ACTION that concludes May 17, 1991 arrest in Brazil, extradition from Brazil and incarceration in the United States on the August 21, 1989 PAROLE VIOLATION WARRANT WAS ILLEGAL. REASON: "RULE OF SPECIALTY" applied to Lambros' case. This is a 3 page motion with 2 pages of exhibits. See, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE, et al., No. 2017-CA-929-B. PDF FORMAT.
FEBRUARY 27, 2018: Lambros WINS NATIONAL APPEAL FROM U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION. The U.S. Parole Commission admits that Lambros was arrested and extradited illegally from Brazil and incarcerated illegally in the United States on the August 21, 1989 PAROLE VIOLATION WARRANT. REASON: DOCTRINE OF SPECIALTY LAW. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1318 and FootNote 56 (Wash. 1997). Pang was extradited from Brazil. Lambros has attached PANG, at 1293, 1318-1322, that offers an excellent overview of the DOCTRINE OF SPECIALITY. This document is in PDF FORMAT. Eight (8) total pages.
JUNE 23, 2017: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, PURSUANT TO TITLE 28 U.S.C. §1361; and TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Filed within the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, Civil Division. LAMBROS vs. NICOLE ENGLISH, Warden U.S. Penitentiary Leavenworth; U.S. Parole Commission. The COMPLAINT is 15 pages in length and exhibits are 23 pages in length, with a 1 page cover letter. Total pages: 39 in PDF FORMAT. This MANDAMUS requests the Court to "ORDER" the defendant's to allow Lambros to stay at USP Leavenworth, due to his medical treatment and forthcoming parole violation hearing.
DOWNLOAD JUNE 23, 2017 "WRIT OF MANDAMUS" IN PDF FORMAT - 39 TOTAL PAGES.
LAMBROS FILES LAW SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL AND RIO de JANEIRO, BRAZIL FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT, RICO, FSIA, AND VIOLATIONS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSUMER PROTECTION PROCEDURES ACT (DCCPPA) - BY FALSELY REPRESENTING THE CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL TO U.S. CITIZENS, BY ALLOWING LIFE SENTENCES AND SENTENCES OVER THIRTY (30) YEARS. D.C. CODE §3904 CREATES A STATUTORY RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM IMPROPER TRADE PRACTICES. See the following DECEMBER 23, 2016 "COMPLAINT".
December 23, 2016: FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT LAW SUIT ("FSIA"), filed in the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Civil Division. LAMBROS vs. Federative Republic of Brazil; State of Rio de Janeiro of the Federative Republic of Brazil; and John & Jane Doe's. The "COMPLAINT" is 132 pages in length with an additional 4 pages of exhibits. Total of 136 pages in PDF FORMAT. DOCKET NO. 2017-CA-929-B.
DOWNLOAD "FSIA" COMPLAINT AGAINST BRAZIL IN PDF FORMAT - 136 TOTAL PAGES.
PORTUGUESE TRANSLATION OF: "FSIA" COMPLAINT AGAINST BRAZIL IN PORTUGUÊS. FORMAT - 132 PAGES IN PORTUGUESE WITH 4 PAGES OF EXHIBITS IN ENGLISH - AS PER COURT "ORDER" ON APRIL 4, 2017. DOWNLOAD HERE.
December 23, 2016: "FSIA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBROS vs. Federative Republic of Brazil, et al.. This is the "MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT." This motion is 10 pages in length with an additional 14 pages of exhibits. Total of 24 pages in PDF FORMAT. DOCKET NO. 2017-CA-929-B
DOWNLOAD "FSIA" MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN PDF FORMAT - 24 TOTAL PAGES.
MARCH 1, 2017: "FSIA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBR0S vs. Federative Republic of Brazil, et al., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. This motion is entitled "PLAINTIFF LAMBROS REQUESTS THE COURT TO "ORDER" THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF' S COMPLAINT, MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, SUMMONS, AND INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER TO ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFF LAMBROS IS PROCEEDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS OF FEBRUARY I0, 2017 "ORDER". See, Super. Ct. Cir. R. 54-II(i) - SERVICE OF PROCESS AND WITNESS FEES." This motion is 4 pages in length with 4 pages of exhibits. Total of 8 pages in PDF FORMAT.
DOWNLOAD "FSIA" MOTION TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF COMPLAINT IN PDF FORMAT - 8 TOTAL PAGES.
MARCH 1, 2017: "FSIA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBROS vs. Federative Republic of Brazil, et al., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. This motion is entitled "PLAINTIFF LAMBROS REQUESTS COURT "ORDER" TO ATTEND THE "INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE" AND ALL LATER PRETRIAL, SETTLEMENT, OR STATUS CONFERENCES BY TELEPHONE OR AUDIO-VIDEO CONNECTION. PLAINTIFF IS PROCEEDING PRO SE AN INCARCERATED AT U.S. PENITENTIARY LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS. See, Title 42 U.S.C. §1997e(f)." This motion is 3 pages in PDF FORMAT.
MARCH 3, 2017 : "FSlA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL : LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, ET AL., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. The Court "ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL." This "ORDER" is two (2) pages in length in PDF Format.
DOWNLOAD COURT'S "ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL" - 2 TOTAL PAGES.
MARCH 14, 2017: "FSIA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, ET AL., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. The Court "ORDER" responding to Lambros' March 1, 2017 request and approving Lambros to appear by phone at the initial scheduling conference. This "ORDER" is two (2) pages in length in PDF Format.
APRIL 4, 2017: "FSlA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, ET AL., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. The Court "ORDER" responding to Lambros' March 1, 2017 request for the Court to "ORDER" the officers of the court to effectuate service of Plaintiff's Complaint, etc. to defendants. The Court states Plaintiff must provide the exact name and mailing address of persons that will except service of process and ALSO A PORTUGUESE TRANSLATION OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT NEED TO BE SERVED. The stated Lambros has until June 5, 2017 to address the above issues or the Court will dismiss the defendants without prejudice. This "ORDER" is four (4) pages in length in PDF Format.
DOWNLOAD COURT'S "ORDER" REQUIRING LAMBROS TO TRANSLATE DOCUMENT - 4 TOTAL PAGES IN PDF FORMAT.
MARCH 21, 2018: Lambros informs court of U.S. Parole Commission, NOTICE OF ACTION that concludes May 17, 1991 arrest in Brazil, extradition from Brazil and incarceration in the United States on the August 21, 1989 PAROLE VIOLATION WARRANT WAS ILLEGAL. REASON: "RULE OF SPECIALTY" applied to Lambros' case. This is a 3 page motion with 2 pages of exhibits. See, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE, et al., No. 2017-CA-929-B. PDF FORMAT.OCTOBER 10, 2015: JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS is seeking a law firm with past skills in the area of Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act litigation. Please review my overview of facts to be considered within "WANTED - FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT ATTORNEY", at FSIA.LAMBROS.NAME. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
JUNE 10, 2015: PASQUALE SCOTTI, was arrested by Brazilian Federal Police on May 26, 2015, due to his conviction in Italy for murdering 26 people. In January 2005, he received a LIFE SENTENCE IN ABSENTIA from Italy. The Brazilian Constitution does not allow LIFE SENTENCES and the Brazilian Criminal Code limits sentences to 30 YEARS. The question is "WILL BRAZIL BE ABLE TO EXTRADITE PASQUALE SCOTTI TO ITALY OR HAVE TO SET HIM FREE?" Read the article, "BRAZIL'S CONSTITUTION AND CRIMINAL CODE PROTECTS MAFIA BOSS PASQUALE SCOTTI FROM LIFE SENTENCE IN ITALY!".
CLICK HERE.
March 18, 2015: Victor Barnard, was arrested by Brazilian police on February 27, 2015, due to an indictment from Pine County, Minnesota. Brazilian law only allows the State of Minnesota to sentence Barnard to a maximum sentence of 30 years if extradited - not 500 plus years - according to the Brazilian constitution and Brazilian criminal code. Read the article, "Victor Barnard Guaranteed 30 Year Maximum Sentence by Brazil!" CLICK HERE.
March 10, 2015: Lambros writes to his "BOYCOTT BRAZIL SUPPORTERS" requesting that they consider the following question, "WHETHER BRAZIL'S CONSTITUTION 'DISCRIMINATES' AGAINST FOREIGN CITIZENS IN BRAZIL, WHEN THEY ARE NOT ENTITLED TO THE SAME CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS - FUNDAMENTAL AND ORGANIC LAW OF THE NATION THAT BRAZILIAN'S ENJOY?". This short "MEMORANDUM OF LAW" offers an overview as to foreign citizens within the United States enjoying the protection of the U.S. Constitution under the Fifth Amendment. Also, facts and law supporting "PURPOSEFUL DISCRIMINATION" by Brazil against foreign citizens within Brazil. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
DECEMBER 12, 2014: Lambros writes U.S. Parole Commission requesting the August 21, 1989 "WARRANT" to be dropped with prejudice, as Lambros was not extradited on the warrant from Brazil. Lambros states he will seek justice by legal process via "THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT" against Brazil for EVERY DAY LAMBROS IS INCARCERATED AFTER JULY 4, 2016, THE DAY LAMBROS IS ELIGIBLE FOR "PRERELEASE CUSTODY". Federal juries have awarded $500,000.00 A MONTH FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW THE LETTER.
DECEMBER 4, 2014: THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS files his "PETITION FOR REHEARING" with the Eighth Circuit, PETTERS vs. USA, No. 14-1840. JailHouse Lawyer Lambros assisted Petters in securing Attorney RICHARD E. FLAMM, an expert within the field of JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION to provide an affidavit stating that it was his opinion that a reasonable person might question whether Judge Kyle could preside impartially over a criminal case involving Mr. Petters, given that FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A. not only represented Mr. Petters companies, but suffered a substantial financial loss as a result. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW NOTION.DECEMBER 28, 2013: THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS informs United States District Court for the District of Minnesota that jailhouse lawyer John Gregory Lambros will assert and litigate PETTERS denial of his Title 28 U.S.C. §2255, by the Honorable Judge Richard H. Kyle on December 5, 2013. PETTERS was a prominent Minneapolis, Minnesota businessman who owned numerous businesses, including Petters Group Worldwide LLC (PGW), Sun Country Airlines, Polaroid Corporation, Fingerhut, and Petters Company, Inc. (PCI), who was convicted of a alleged massive $3.65 billion Ponzi scheme. Judge Kyle sentenced Petters to 50 years of imprisonment after a month-long trial. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW THE MOTIONS LAMBROS FILES FOR PETTERS.
DECEMBER 9, 2013: Lambros files "PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI" as to October 4, 2013 "ORDER AND JUDGMENT" by U.S. Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit that affirmed the district court's order in dismissal of WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA. Lambros' writ of certiorari offers an excellent overview as to the illegal sentencing information the government used within two (2) plea agreements it offered Lambros, in violation of the considerations set out by the Supreme Court in MISSOURI vs. FRYE and LAFLER vs. COOPER. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
OCTOBER 4, 2013: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denies Lambros' WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA. See, JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, No. 13-3159. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
August 28, 2013: Lambros appeals the denial of his WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. John Gregory Lambros vs. Claude Maye, Warden, Docket No. 13-3159 (2013). CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
July 1, 2013: Richard D. Rogers, U.S. District Court Judge issues "ORDER" and denies Lambros' Rule 59(e), Writ of Audita Querela. LAMBROS vs. MAYE, Warden, Civil Docket No. 13-3034-RDR. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
JUNE 5, 2013: Lambros files "MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT OF COUNT'S "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER" FILED ON MAY 17, 2013, PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE." LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, Civil Docket No. 13-3034-RDR. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
MAY 17, 2013: Richard D. Rogers, United States District Judge responds to Lambros' February 26, 2013 petition for Habeas Corpus and/or Writ of Audita Querela within his "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER." LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, Civil Docket No. 13-3034-RDR. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
APRIL 2, 2013: Lambros response to "UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE 2255 HABEAS PETITION" dated March 22, 2013. LAMBROS vs. USA, Civil Docket No. 13-1561, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
MARCH 22, 2013: United States Attorney B. Todd Jones and Assistant United States Attorney Ann M. Anaya "RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT [Lambros'] APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION." LAMBROS vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 13-1561, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
MARCH 7, 2013: Lambros files "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE .... 2255", as to USA vs. LAMBROS, Criminal Docket No.'s 3-76-17 and 3-75-128, U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 - PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL CUSTODY - Title 28 U.S.C. §2241; AND/OR "WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA" - under the "All Writs Act", Title 28 U.S.C. §1651(a). JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, Warden for U.S. Penitentiary Leavenworth, Civil Docket No. 5:13-cv-3034-RDR, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. This motion is twenty (20) pages in length which includes the cover letter. Also attached is the "INDEX AND EXHIBITS" MOTION which is three (3) pages in length NOT INCLUDING THE EXHIBITS. Please note that the exhibits are all available in the above postings. THIS MOTION WAS FILED DUE TO THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS REFUSING TO MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATE CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AS REQUIRED BY LAW. Therefore, Lambros' 28 U.S.C. §2255 was "INADEQUATE AND/OR INEFFECTIVE" thus offering Lambros a remedy of law within the federal court where he is incarcerated. This document is a total of twenty three (23) pages in PDF FORMAT.
November 5, 2012 - "MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DIANA MURPHY FROM THE JUDGMENT IN THIS ABOVE-ENTITLED ACTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 28 U.S.C. 9§ 455 et. al."
NOVEMBER 5, 2012 - "PETITION FOR REHEARING (FRAP 40) WITH SUGGESTION FOR PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (FRAP 35)".
Lambros files the above two motion due to the October 24, 2012 denial of his request to file a successive habeas application in the district court. Please note that Judge Diana Murphy denied Lambros' request which is not legal, as she was the District Court Judge that ORIGINALLY CONDUCTED THE TRIAL AND SENTENCING OF LAMBROS IN THIS ACTION. A JUDGE CANNOT JUDGE HIS OR HER OWN WORK! Lambros has requested that the panel of judges vacate the order and assign a new three judge panel to review Lambros' request. Also, of interest is the fact the panel of judges DID NOT offer an opinion within the denial, when the law requires the court to state the REASONS FOR DENIAL EITHER BY INFORMAL MEMORANDUM, BY RECITAL IN AN ORDER, OR BY FINDINGS. The above motions are thirteen (13) pages total, which includes a cover letter to the court and two pages of exhibits. This document is in PDF FORMAT. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427 (8th Circuit Court of Appeals)
DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 5, 2012 - LAMBROS' "MOTION FOR RECUSAL" AND "PETITION FOR REHEARING' - HERE IN PDF.
OCTOBER 24, 2012 - LAMBROS' "PETITION FOR SUCCESSIVE 5 2255" IS DENIED."
Circuit Court Judges Diana Murphy, SMITH and BENTON denied Lambros successive § 2255 without offering the reasons for denial either by informal memorandum, by recital in an order, or by findings - as required by law. See, Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 "....... DETERMINE THE ISSUES AND MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT AND WITH RESPECT THERETO. ..." JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427.
DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 24, 2012 - "JUDGMENT" BY U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR EIGHTH CIRCUIT - HERE IN PDF.
October 17, 2012 - "SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO INFORM COURT OF NEW RELEVANT PUBLISHED HOLDING THAT CONTAINS PERSUASIVE VALUE ON THE ONLY ISSUE IN THIS ACTION - U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APPLY LAFLER vs. COOPER, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012) AND MISSOURI vs. FRYE, 132 S. Ct. 1399 (2012) RETROACTIVELY."
Lambros informs the Eighth Circuit of the September 28, 2012, OPINION in TYRONE W. MILES vs. MICHAEL MARTEL, WARDEN, No. 10-15633, by Circuit Judge Betty B. Fletcher of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, who applied the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in LAFLER vs. COOPER and MISSOURI vs. FRYE, RETROACTIVELY. "By applying this holding in LAFLER, a habeas petition subject to AEDPA, the Court necessarily implied that this holding applies to habeas petitioners WHOSE CASES ARE ALREADY FINAL ON DIRECT REVIEW; i.e. THAT THE HOLDING APPLIES RETROACTIVELY." This is a short motion with an exhibit containing portions of MILES vs. MARTEL, as to the application of RETROACTIVE APPLICATION. The motion is 4 pages with cover letter and 4 pages of exhibits - 8 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.
July 23, 2012 - "UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LAMBROS' APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION", DATED: July 23, 2012.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann M. Anaya and U.S. Attorney B. Todd Jones respond to John Lambros June 8, 2012 "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3) and § 2255(h)(2) BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." Please note that the District Court Clerk for the District of Minnesota did not file Lambros' motion and mailed it directly to the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Case No. 12-2427. The government's motion is ten (10) pages and nineteen (19) pages of exhibit - 29 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.
DOWNLOAD JULY 23, 2012 GOVERNMENT RESPONSE MOTION TO LAMBROS' 5 2255, HERE IN PDF.
August 13, 2012 - "MOVANT LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO "UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION" - DATED: July 23, 2012."
Lambros response to the government's response and requests that United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to proceed in this action, as the government has ADMITTED TO ALL THE ALLEGATIONS WITHIN LAMBROS' §2255, due to violations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 10(b) and Rule 8(b) and Rule 8(d). THIS IS AN EXCELLENT MOTION THAT HIGHLIGHTS FACTS COVERED-UP BY THE U.S. Department of State and the Government's use of the incorrect criminal statutes against Lambros. This motion is 19 pages in length with another 1 page cover letter and 15 pages of exhibits - 35 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.
JUNE 8, 2012 - Lambros files "MOTION TO LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3) and § 2255(h)(2)."
On March 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down two (2) decisions that expanded the opportunities for defendants to overturn their convictions on the basis of POST-CONVICTION CLAIMS that their attorneys did an unreasonably poor job during PLEA NEGOTIATIONS. Defendants who can show that their attorneys failed to give them competent counsel regarding plea offers CAN GET A LOWER SENTENCE OR HAVE THE PROSECUTOR RE-EXTEND THE PLEA OFFER, EVEN IF THE DEFENDANT RECEIVED A FAIR TRIAL AFTER THEY REJECTED THE OFFER, THE COURT MAKES CLEAR. See, MISSOURI v. FRYE, 132 S. Ct. 1399; and LAFLER v. COOPER, 132 S. Ct. 1376. Lambros' counsel stated during the government's PLEA OFFER that the only sentence Lambros could receive was a MANDATORY LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE. This was not true. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF MOTION.February 22, 2012 - New Zealand gives BAIL to persons awaiting extradition to United States - Brazil doesn't!!! Kim Dotcom, the founder of website Megaupload.com, has been released on BAIL in New Zealand as he awaits a decision on whether he will be extradited to the United States to face RACKETEERING, MONEY LAUNDERING, COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND WIRE FRAUD CHARGES. Six (6) others charged within the same indictment have already been released on bail. Kim Dotcom was lucky that he wasn't in Brazil when he was arrested, as Brazil will not even give a person waiting extradition to the United States a BAIL HEARING. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF ARTICLES.
November 17, 2011 - PORTUGAL WON'T EXTRADITE U.S. CITIZEN TO U.S.: Portuguese Court denied the U.S. request to extradite George Wright to the U.S. for hijacking a jet to Algeria in 1972. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF THE ARTICLE.
December 7, 2011 - AMERICAN CONVICTED IN MEXICO OF DRUG TRAFFICKING WAS TORTURED WHILE IN MEXICAN CUSTODY WAS FREED BY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: Shohn Huckabee, 24, and his friend Carlos Quijas were arrested and convicted of drug trafficking in Mexico in December 2009. After being arrested by Mexican military they were beaten, subjected to electric shock and threatened with death. Huckabee was transferred to the U.S. and released by the U.S. Parole Commission due to his "torture[Ed] in foreign custody". Carlos Quijas is awaiting a similar transfer and release. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF THE ARTICLE.
December 16, 2010 - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange: Julian Assange - the Australian - was freed on bail from London's High Court as Sweden pushes its case for extradition. Assange was being held on a warrant for his extradition to Sweden. PLEASE NOTE THAT BRAZIL WOULD NOT OF GIVEN JULIAN ASSANGE A BAIL HEARING OR BAIL FOR EXTRADITION. LAMBROS HAD BAIL SET BY THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE ARREST WARRANT AND BRAZIL REFUSED TO HOLD A BAIL HEARING. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF THE ARTICLE ON BAIL IN LONDON FOR ASSANGE.
FEBRUARY 19, 2010 - HUGO CHAVEZ, President of Venezuela: This is the letter John Gregory Lambros wrote President Chavez as to "INJURY IN FACT" being committed by the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Justice IN NOT HONORING EXTRADITION DECREES FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF VENEZUELA IN EXTRADITION PROCEEDINGS TO THE UNITED STATES. Venezuela does not allow a criminal sentence greater than 30-YEARS and the Supreme Court of Venezuela states in every extradition decree that the person will not be sentenced to more than 30-YEARS. When the extradited person from Venezuela reaches the U.S. Court system they are given sentences greater than 30-YEARS. - CRISTOBAL RODRIGUEZ BENITEZ, 19-years to life - Lambros also offers case law that GRANTS BAIL WHEN THE U.S. REQUESTS EXTRADITION OF PERSONS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES. See Page 9 of letter. Lambros requests President Chavez to contact his Attorney General - LUISA ORTEGA DIAZ - to AMEND the U.S.-Venezuela Extradition Treaty to incorporate a penalty clause of $100,000.00 per-day for all breaches to agreed-upon sentencing limitations (30-year sentences). CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF THE FEBRUARY 19, 2010 LETTER.
OCTOBER 05, 2009 - EMMET G. SULLIVAN, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, for the District of Columbia, REFUSES TO FILE "JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION OF INTERVENTION - OR ALTERNATIVELY - JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF," dated September 14, 2009. Lambros raises the question of law "Whether the term of "SUPERVISED RELEASE" must be included within the maximum thirty (30) year sentence limitation as expressed in extradition ORDERS from COLOMBIA, BRAZIL, and VENEZUELA. This motion and refusal to file order was submitted in the case of USA vs. WILBER ALIRITO VARELA, DIEGO LEON MONTOYA-SANCHEZ, LUIS HERNANDO GOMEZ-BUSTAMANTE, ARCANGEL HENAO-MONTOYA, JUAN CARLOS RAMIREZ-ABADIA (arrested in Brazil & awaiting extradition), CARLOS ALBERTO RENTERIA-MANTILLA, GABRIEL PUERTA-PARRA, JORGE ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ-ACERO, and JAIRO APARICIO-LENIS, criminal docket number 04-126. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF MOTION AND ORDER (signed on cover-page of letter to clerk) BY JUDGE SULLIVAN.
AUGUST 7, 2009 - LORETTA A. PRESKA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, for the Southern District of New York, REFUSES TO FILE "JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION OF INTERVENTION - OR ALTERNATIVELY - JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF. Dated July 29, 2009." Lambros raises the question of law: "Whether the term of SUPERVISED RELEASE must be included within the maximum thirty (30) year sentence limitation as expressed in extradition ORDERS and TREATIES from COLOMBIA." This motion and refusal to file order was submitted in case USA vs. DANIEL RENDON-HERRERA, FREDDY ENRIQUE RENDON-HERRERA, JHON JAIRO RENDON-HERRERA, DIEGO RIVAS-ANGEL, DATRO ANTONIO USUGA-DAVID, JUAN DE DIOS USUGADAVID, criminal docket numbers 04-CR-962 (LAP) and 08-CR-659 (SAS). CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF MOTION and ORDER BY JUDGE PRESKA.
March 2, 2009 - LAMBROS REQUESTS MIAMI FEDERAL COURT to allow Petition of Intervention or alternatively Amicus Curiae brief regarding extradition cases from COLOMBIA, BRAZIL, and VENEZUELA, as to the question of law: "Whether the term of SUPERVISED RELEASE must be included within the maximum thirty (30) year sentence limitation as expressed in extradition orders and treaties?" CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF MOTION.
November 17, 2008, LUIS IGNACIO GUZMAN, Consul General for Colombia. Lambros writes Consul General Guzman thanking him for responding to his June 03, 2008 letter and offers additional law as to persons being sentenced to MORE than thirty (30) years when the term of "SUPERVISED RELEASE" is included within the term of imprisonment. Therefore, an injury in fact to all persons extradited from Colombia to the United States, as per the extradition decrees by the Colombian Supreme Court. Colombia is also advised of the current extradition of PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO, a citizen of Colombia, from Brazil to the USA and Brazil's Supreme Court's past failure to enforce a thirty (30) year criminal sentence when extraditing persons to the United States. Consul Guzman's July 30, 2008 letter is attached as an exhibit. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF LETTER.
The following affiliated websites supporting the Boycott of Brazil due to the illegal extradition, torture, and mind control of John Gregory Lambros, by Brazil, have new domain addresses:
Boycott Brazil Index: www.BoycottBrazil.com
False Beliefs: www.FalseBeliefs.BoycottBrazil.com
Brazil Lien Account: www.BrazilLien.BoycottBrazil.com
Legal Notice of Fraud and Deceit By Attorney Colia F. Ceisel: www.FraudByCeisel.BoycottBrazil.com
Boycott Orange Juice from Brazil: www.BoycottBrazilOJ.BoycottBrazil.com
Boycott Soybeans from Brazil: www.BrazilSoybeans.BoycottBrazil.com
Minnesota Legal Shysters: www.LegalShysters.BoycottBrazil.com
Brazil Legal Shysters: www.BrazilShysters.BoycottBrazil.comJune 03, 2008, CONSULADO GENERAL de COLOMBIA. Lambros requests the Consulate General for Colombia to investigate the illegal conduct of U.S. Attorney's and Court's when they sentence persons extradited from Colombia to sentences of more than thirty (30) years when they include the term of "SUPERVISED RELEASE" in addition to the term of imprisonment. The Supreme Court of Colombia does not allow U.S. Court's to sentence persons extradited from Colombia to be sentenced to more than thirty (30) years, as per the resolutions within every extradition decree. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF LETTER.
August - September 2007, "GRAND OPENING!" of Boycott Brazil's FREE CLASSIFIED AD website, www.nopayclassifieds.com.
The new free classified and Local Business Directory advertising site covers 50 countries and all zip and postal codes within each country. We believe this site could lead to new sources of exposure for BOYCOTT BRAZIL. John Lambros is requesting that all supporters "SPREAD THE WORD" and GO THERE AND ADD A FREE CLASSIFIED AD OR LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS. It will take only five minutes. Thank you!" Click here for the August-September 2007, PRESS RELEASE "Free Online 'Local Business Directory' And Classified Advertising Site Covers 50 Countries - A Click Away!!!"
April 05, 2007, Lambros submits a complaint against Attorney ANDREA G. HOFFMAN, Miami, Florida to THE FLORIDA BAR, requesting investigation of ethical conduct by Attorney HOFFMAN in preventing the enforcement of U.S. Criminal Statutes as defined by the U.S. Congress and punishments prescribed therefor, in the illegal extradition of PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO from Brazil. Click here for more information and copy of letter and complaint.
February 08, 2007, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ORDERS the August 17, 1988 ORDER by the Supreme Court of Venezuela UNENFORCEABLE as to* BENITIZ not receiving a penalty of more than thirty (30) years, if convicted in the United States. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Venezuela had communicated the conditions of BENITIZ extradition to the United States with the understanding that a sentence could not exceed thirty (30) years to no avail. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF LEGAL OPINION BY NINTH CIRCUIT, BENITIZ vs. GARCIA, 476 F.3d 676 (9th Cir. 2007).
March 27, 2007, letter from Lambros to ANDREA G. HOFFMAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney in Miami, Florida. Attorney HOFFMAN is the governments' attorney in the illegal extradition of PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO from BRAZIL. USA vs. PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO- MONTANO, Criminal No. 06-20139, Southern District of Florida. Lambros places Attorney HOFFMAN on NOTICE as to her illegal actions before filing complaints with the courts.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF LETTER.August 13, 2006, letter from Lambros to his SUPPORTERS regarding PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO. This letter outlines the sentences RAYO-MONTANO will receive if extradited from Brazil, LIFE SENTENCE, and the PENALTY SHEET signed by Assistant United States Attorney ANDREA G. HOFFMAN stating same. The indictment is also attached for your review. PLEASE DISTRIBUTE THIS DOCUMENT THROUGHOUT BRAZIL via www.ORKUT.COM (almost 70% Brazilians)
CLICK HERE FOR COPY OF ARTICLE.MAY - JUNE 2006, "GRAND OPENING" OF NEW WEB SITE: John Lambros and supporters of Boycott Brazil are pleased to announce the "GRAND OPENING" rollout of our global portal database to divert landfill waste for reuse, by identifying usable items and those who will receive them. Please help us spread the word about: www.FreeRetiredStuff.com
PRESS RELEASE - MAY-JUNE 2006, "GRAND OPENING" This document is in PDF FORMAT.
PRESS RELEASE January 15, 2007: "FREE ONLINE CLASSIFIED NEWSPAPER ALLOWS 3.8 BILLION PEOPLE'S TRASH TO BE ANOTHER'S TREASURE - WITHIN 21 NEW MARKETS!" This document is in PDF FORMAT.
May 18, 2006, PABLO RAYO-MONTANO arrested in Brazil by DEA for extradition to USA. Will Brazil extradite RAYO-MONTANO to the USA when he can only receive a life sentence that Brazil does not allow? CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF ARTICLE.
February 28, 2006, Filed March 2, 2006, WRIT OF CERTIORARI in LAMBROS vs. U.S., U.S. Supreme Court Number 05-9611. Lambros is requesting the Supreme Court to rule CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003) retroactive and allow CASTRO to apply to Pro Se Motion when the inmate was also represented by an attorney. This Document is a total of seventy-nine (79) pages. The question presented to the Supreme Court, "WHETHER LA14BROS WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AS EMBODIED WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION, ART. 1, Section 9, Cl. 2." CLICK HERE to go directly to the above motion within the homepage.
DOES BOYCOTT BRAZIL NEED A NEW LOGO???? Attached for your downloading are several new logos BOYCOTT BRAZIL is considering for this site. In fact, BOYCOTT BRAZIL may incorporate several logos!!!!! Please write John Gregory Lambros with your thoughts. THANK YOU!!!!
VIEW NEW LOGOS FOR BOYCOTT BRAZIL HERE.GENERAL ELECTRIC'S COMMERCIAL FINANCE WILL NOT DO BUSINESS IN BRAZIL DUE TO BRAZIL'S UNSTABLE GOVERNMENT AND LEGAL SYSTEM THAT DOES NOT PROTECT THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF FOREIGNERS. CLICK HERE to go directly to more information within this homepage. It appears Brazil denies due process to all foreigners.
September 27, 2005, Lambros' files "MOTION FOR RELIEF DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, U.S. vs. BOOKER, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)." The Supreme Court stated the Sentencing Guidelines violated the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution in that it conflicts with the accused right to a jury trial. Lambros' sentence could not be increased from one guideline range to another based on facts not proved by a jury. Therefore, Lambros' two (2) THIRTY (30) YEAR SENTENCES SHOULD BE REDUCED TO TEN (10) YEARS, THE SAME AS THE TWO (2) COUNTS THAT OCCURRED BEFORE THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES TOOK EFFECT ON NOVEMBER 01., 1987. CLICK HERE to go directly to the above motion within the homepage.
February 15, 2005, Lambros files the following motion with the District Court in Minnesota, "MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER, DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, CRAWFORD vs. WASHINGTON, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (March 8, 2004)" Lambros' attorney was not allowed to interview or cross-examine the out-of-court statements entered into evidence that were testimonial in nature by DONALD HENDRICKSON (paid government informant), ROGER LEWIS, REBECCA LEWIS, and DAVID PAGEL. CLICK HERE to go directly to the above motions within the homepage. THIS RULE 60(b) MOTION IS STARTING TO GET INTERESTING AS THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ORDERED THE GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT NEVER MADE A RULING AND THE DISTRICT COURT CLERK STATES SHE NEVER TRANSFERRED SAME. Lambros now offers the government's response dated April 20, 2005 and Lambros response dated April 28, 2005. Also copy of letters from the Clerks office as to which court has jurisdiction.
January 1, 2005, Boycott Brazil has registered the web site addresses: www.extradition.org and mindcontrol.us to point to this web site.
November 3, 2004 thru August 30, 2005, motions filed by government and Lambros as to intervening change in law, CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003). Lambros is asking the Eighth Circuit why the district court SUSPENDED HIS RIGHT TO FILE A FIRST WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, as guaranteed within the United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2?y CLICK HERE to go directly to the above motions within the homepage.
November 01, 2004, Memorandum entitled, "LAMBROS COMPARED TO CHE GUEVARA." This memorandum was released to associates and supporters of BOYCOTT BRAZIL, by Ron Simmat, Public Relations Director for Boycott Brazil. THIS PDF FORMATTED ONE (1) PAGE DOCUMENT REQUIRES ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.
September 07, 2004, "MOTION TO VACATE FEBRUARY 10, 1997, JUDGMENT DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (December 15, 2003), UNDER ANY ONE OF THREE SEPARATE SUBSECTIONS OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) - SECTIONS ONE (1), FIVE (5), AND SIX (6)." This document is a total of sixty-four (64) pages including cover letter to clerk of the court, main pleading and exhibits in LAMBROS vs. U.S., Criminal No. 4-89-82(05). This motion offers the complete sentencing transcript of the February 10, 1997 resentencing of John G. Lambros as Exhibit C. The sentencing transcript of February 10, 1997 offers an excellent overview as to the bias of Judge Robert C. Renner towards Lambros. Lambros requested Judge Renner several times for a ruling on the GENERAL JURY VERDICT issue which was required by the Eighth Circuit, U.S. vs. OWENS, 904 F.2d 411, 414415 (8th Cir. 1990), but Judge Renner refused due to the fact he could only sentence Lambros to no more than five (5) years. See pages five thru nine in the main pleading. This document is in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED BY CLICKING HERE.
July 06, 2004, PUBLIC RELEASE of January 12, 2000, confidential letter from Lambros to Judge John M. Mason and David S. Doty. This letter offers documents from Raymond H. Lavas, Technical consultant for Ted L. Gunderson and Associates, International Security Consultating and Investigation, Santa Monica, California and Dr. Antony C. Sutton, D.Sc., editor of the PHOENIX LETTER and author or over 25 books. Lambros believes the governments of Brazil and the United States have placed pressure on both individuals to keep quiet as to the documents being released. This letter is 27 pages including exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD JANUARY 12, 2000, LETTER FROM LAMBROS TO JUDGE MASON AMD JUDGE DOTY HERE IN PDF.
July 04, 2004, MEMORANDUM TO SUPPORTERS OF BOYCOTT BRAZIL, by Ron Simmat
Public Relations Director, Boycott Brazil, entitled "MINNESOTA BAR PROTECTS STATECOURTS: Office of Professional Responsibility Rules Minnesota Supreme Court Need Not Follow State Constitution." This memorandum is a total of six (6) pages including exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD JULY 04,, 2004, MEMORADUM TO SUPPORTERS OF BOYCOTT BRAZIL BY RON SIMMAT HERE IN PDF.
May 06, 2004, letter from Thomas F. Ascher, Assistant Director, Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility for the Minnesota Bar Association, to Lambros. Lambros' April 29, 2004 complaint filed against the Minnesota Supreme Court Justices on August 06, 1993, as to violations of Article 1, Section 8, of the State of Minnesota Constitution in there ruling in DZIUBAK vs. MOTT, 503 N.W.2d 771, is DENIED. This letter is one (1) page and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD MAY 06, 2004, LETTER FROM OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY HERE IN PDF.
April 29, 2004, Complaint filed against Minnesota Supreme Court Justices on August 06, 1993, as to violations of Article 1, Section 8, of the State of Minnesota Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause when they wrote the opinion in DZIUBAK vs. MOTT, 503 N.W.2d 771 (Minn. 1993). The following judges where also attorneys subject to discipline as an attorney by the bar association: Alexander Keith; Rosalie Wahl, John Simonett, Esther Tomljanovich, Sandra Gardebring, Allan Page, and Jean Coyne. Also attached is copy of Lambros' May 1, 2004, letter of NOTICE to Kathleen Blatz, Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, as to this action. THE BOTTOM LINE: If there are policy reasons for immunizing public defenders from liability, the law should be changed by the legislature, NOT THE COURT. Why is State common law immunity available to public defenders when Federal common law immunity IS NOT AVAILABLE? The above listed letters are eight (8) pages with exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD APRIL 29, 2004 COMPLAINT AGAINST MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HERE IN PDF.
January 01, 2004, Brazil announced that all United States Citizens entering Brazil will be fingerprinted and photographed, as per the order of a Brazilian Judge. This information was received from www.theworld.org.
Google and Yahoo! search engines both rank this site NUMBER ONE (#1) under the search words: BOYCOTT BRAZIL (227,000 and 268,000 results) and BRAZIL BOYCOTT (55,400 and 152,000 results), as of May 20, 2005. This site received more than one (1) million hits in 2004. Yahoo! Search reports 1,070 links to www.brazilboycott.org as of August 2005. Thank you for your support!
May 20, 2003, Lambros returns to the District Court and files a MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW. This is a continuation of Lambros' April 13, 2001 motion to vacate judgment due to violations of Title 28 U.S.C.A. §455(a) and §455(b)(3) by U.S. Judge ROBERT G. RENNER'S impartiality towards Lambros during all proceedings. CLICK HERE to go to document within this site. FOR SOME REASON THE COURT DOES NOT WANT TO CONDUCT A HEARING AT WHICH THERE WOULD BE FULL DISCLOSURE ON RECORD OF BASIS FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE RENNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. § 455(e). WHY? See, IN RE KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, 85 F.3d 1353, 1359 (8th Cir. 1996); MORGAN vs. CLARKE, 296 F.3d 638, 648 (8th Cir. 2002); BARKSDALE vs. EMERICK, 853 F.2d 1359, 1361-1363 (6th Cir. 1988).
"WHERE'S THE JURISDICTION JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER!" This article was published for the internet magazine JUSTICE DENIED -- The Magazine for the Falsely Convicted, as per their request on November 30, 2002. Please visit the JUSTICE DENIED web site: www.justicedenied.org. This five (5) page story with five (5) pages of exhibits, total ten pages, is being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 9, 2002 ARTICLE "WHERE'S THE JURISDICTION JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER!" HERE IN PDF.
December 1996 interview of John Gregory Lambros by "WAVE STATION X." This interview has just been released in written form in August 2003. CLICK HERE to go to document within this site.
: Please visit, sign, promote, and establish links to www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html which is currently hosting the Boycott Brazil "Petition For The United States Senate Committee On The Judiciary To Investigate U.S. Senior Court Judge Robert G. Renner, District of Minnesota, As To His Breach Of Public Trust And Abuse Of Judicial Power." Thank You!
PLEASE VISIT "MINNESOTA LEGAL SHYSTERS." The web site designed to expose transgressions by Minnesota Judges and Lawyers. Web site: Legal Shysters
PLEASE VISIT "BOYCOTT BRAZILIAN ORANGE JUICE." The web site designed to expose the loss of jobs by U.S. orange growers due to Brazilian orange juice. Web site: Boycott Brazi lOJ
PLEASE VISIT "SCHIZOPHRENIA or MIND CONTROL." The web site designed to question doctors who have labeled 2 million Americans with schizophrenia. Web site: False Beliefs
LAMBROS IS PREPARING TO REQUEST "SILICONE ANTIBODY TEST" to prove again he has brain control implants. A one page overview as to companies offering SILICONE ANTIBODY TESTING to detect medical problems resulting from silicone toxicity from brain implants and one page from CABRERA vs. CORDIS CORP., 134 F.3d 1418 (9th Cir. 1998) by Barclays Law Publishers in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD SILICONE ANTIBODY TEST DOCUMENT DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2002 HERE IN PDF.
MAY/JUNE 2002 PRESS RELEASE, entitled "ELECTROMAGNETIC COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH." Confidential source exposes "PARAMETRIC CAVITIES" as the implants detected in the X-Rays of John Gregory Lambros' SKULL. Please help to distribute this PRESS RELEASE to the global broadcast media. Thank you. Click here for press release..
May 12, 2002
NOTICE TO PERFORM AND/OR ACTUAL NOTICE to Robert G. Renner, U.S. Senior District Court Judge from John G. Lambros, dated March 27, 2002. Why was Judge Rosenbaum assigned the case when Judge Renner had been assigned from 1997 thru February 20, 2001? This letter is 7 pages in total with exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD MARCH 27, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO JUDGE RENNER HERE IN PDF.March 20, 2002, ADDENDUM TO AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT OF LAMBROS TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES E. GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter is 3 pages with 29 pages of exhibits being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Total of 35 pages)
DOWNLOAD MARCH 20, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO U.S. SENATOR GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF.2002 PRESS RELEASE (January/February/March) entitled "WITCH-HUNT?" Will U.S. Federal Judge Robert G. Renner go down in history as a modern equivalent of the judges in the Salem witch trials of the 1690s?
Motion to Vacate ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS of Judge Robert G. Renner
Send a message to John Gregory Lambros
Use Google to Search the Boycott Brazil Site
FREE TRANSLATION SERVICES OF THIS WEB SITE INTO ANOTHER LANGUAGE
BOYCOTT BRAZIL knows it's a big world out there, and many visitors to this site may need help interpreting the content of this web site. Therefore, I am offering links to FREE TRANSLATION SERVICES online for quick translations of individual words, e-mail messages, or entire web pages. The following free translation services might not pass muster at an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council, but they will help you understand BOYCOTT BRAZIL:
1. Google: allows for translation into 40 languages.CLICK HERE. For automatic translation in instant messaging in 12 languages you must add a translation robot at: http://bot.talk.google.com
2. FreeTranslation: www.freetranslation.com
3. Systran: www.systransoft.com
4. If you need a dictionary to consult on any of the words used in this site, please go to the best dictionary site on the internet. The site offers dictionariesfor 270 languages: www.yourdictionary.com
POST FREE CLASSIFIED ADS, BUSINESS DIRECTORY LISTING AND YELLOW PAGE LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS - WITHIN 50 COUNTRIES. SEARCHING FOR A SPECIAL ITEM? SEARCH OVER 35 MILLION CLASSIFIED ADS WITH OVER 500,000 NEW ADS DAILY!!! Visite: www.NoPayClassifieds.com.
What's Going on Here?
or
How to Find Your Way Around this Web Site.
This homepage is an
index. First (immediately
following this blurb),
you will find a direct
link to the Boycott
Brazil list of Mind
Control Resources
on the Internet.
Next, after some
administrative stuff,
you will find a
short background
statement about John
Gregory Lambros, a native
Twin Cities businessman.Then the rest of this
homepage is an index.
There are twelve major
divisions. Click on the
section title on the
right to go directly
to that part of the index.At the end, you will find
a snail mail address to
contact John Gregory Lambros
and WEB RINGS that may be
of interest to you.Have fun! And come
back often as this site
is updated often.WHERE TO START: the basics of John Gregory Lambros, a Native of Minnesota.
UNITED STATES SENATOR CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" INVESTIGATE LAMBROS' TORTURE AND EXTRADITION FROM BRAZIL.
BOYCOTT: learn about the boycott of Brazilian products and services due to the torture and electronic mind control of John Gregory Lambros. This section also requests your assistance in establishing
SELECTIVE PURCHASING ORDINANCES
in your town, city, and state.LEGAL: see some of the legal
documents filed by John Gregory Lambros in
his battle for justice and relief from
continuing torture.MEDICAL: the basics of the medical
problems faced by John Gregory Lambros.VICTIMS: find out about other
victims of electronic mind control.IMPLANTS: the basics of John
Gregory Lambros.CONTACT YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS TO BOYCOTT BRAZIL: If you would like to email, mail, or phone your elected officials as to the torture and forced implantation to John Gregory Lambros and the Boycott of Brazil, please click here to access THE CONSERVATIVE ACTIVIST'S web site that will assist you in contacting your elected officials. www.conservativeusa.org
PEOPLE AND BUSINESS FINDER: find anyone or any business
CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS - LINE ADS - ADLINKS
INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION NEWS: News stories as to persons being extradited globally.
COPYRIGHTS: yes, we have that
stuff too.
Links to other victims and web sites
discussing every aspect of electronic mind control.
The URL for this homepage is:
http://www.brazilboycott.orgNo fiction writer would dare to use what really happened to an American businessman in Brazil as the story line for a novel. It would certainly be called "not believable" by the critics. But sadly, what is "not believable" as fiction really happened to John Gregory Lambros.
Minnesota stockbroker, investment banker and international businessman John Gregory Lambros was arrested on May 17, 1991, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. He was denied a bail hearing and bail that had been previously approved by the U.S. federal district court judge that authorized his arrest in Brazil. Lambros was denied court appearances required by the Brazilian Constitution, and his family was ripped-off by scamming Rio de Janeiro attorneys: CARLOS ROBERTO SCHLESINGER, NELIO ROBERTO SEIDL MACHADO, RUY LUDOLF RIBEIRO, and VERNON DALE McNAMEE. Lambros was held in degrading conditions in Rio de Janeiro and Brasilia, Brazil, and tortured in Brazilia, Brazil while awaiting extradition to the State of Minnesota.
You say, "That's what happens when you get arrested in a third-world country, right?" Well maybe, but the usual foreign arrest doesn't include the high-tech depaterning (interrogation) that Lambros was subjected to: a form of torture akin to living inside a toaster, bombarded by an intense elector-magnetic field twenty-four hours each day. But when depaterning apparently didn't deliver the results the Brazilians (acting as U.S. agents) wanted (or needed) from Lambros, implants were surgically implanted in Lambros's brain to interrogate, monitor and control him.
To add insult to injury, the Brazilian Supreme Court ILLEGALLY granted Lambros' extradition to the United States on April 30, 1992, knowing Lambros could only receive a MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE. The Brazilian Supreme Court had been advised several times by the United States Embassy in Brasilia, Brazil and by Lambros that the Brazilian Constitution did not allow extradition of persons facing a life sentence. The Brazilian Constitution prohibits any penalty of a lifelong character (Article 5, clause XLVII, b) and Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, limits the maximum sentence in Brazil to THIRTY (30) YEARS. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1352 (Washington, 1997). Lambros COULD NOT legally be extradited, as proven by Mexico's Supreme Court, who blocks the extradition of criminal suspects facing life sentences in the United States. See, "INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION NEWS" section within this web site for details. In fact, the Brazilian Supreme Court never applied "The Doctrine of Dual Criminality" to Lambros' criminal conduct. 'Double criminality' is in effect a reciprocity REQUIREMENT which is intended to ensure both the U.S. and Brazil that they can rely on CORRESPONDING TREATMENT. In November 1997, Lambros retained the U.S. and Brazilian Lawyers for MARTIN SHAW PANG, who advised Lambros that CONSPIRACY to distribute cocaine is specifically addressed in Brazilian Law No. 6368, Article 14, and carries a sentence of THREE (3) to TEN (10) YEARS. Therefore, the Brazilian Supreme Court by resolution should of at least stated to the United States that Lambros MUST NOT BE SENTENCED TO PRISON FOR MORE THAN THREE (3) to TEN (10) YEARS. CLICK HERE FOR PDF COPY OF DECEMBER 19, 1997 LETTER FROM MARTIN SHAW PANG'S U.S. AND BRAZILIAN ATTORNEY'S TO LAMBROS. (December 19, 1997 letter from Attorney Timothy Dole, Browne & Ressler, Seattle, Wa. and Attorney Dr. Roberto B. Dias da Silva, Escritorio de Advocacia; Rua Marconi, n053 - Coni. 83; Sao Paulo, SP; Brazil to Lambros. This letter offers an excellent overview about statutes of limitation and maximum sentences for drugs within Brazil's Penal Code).
Back in the U.S.A. there was a massive cover-up by the CIA, the Department of Justice, and the State Department, supported by the government and courts of Brazil. Lambros has now sustained years of torture and mind control. He has also been denied the freedom to practice his religion. Lambros remains imprisoned by the federal government, and has been denied the medical treatment he so desperately needs. Lambros' sentence was overturned on September 8, 1995 by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals that vacated his mandatory life sentence without parole because the sentence was not legal under a law in effect at the time of his alleged crime. See U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 1995). The sentencing mistake occurred with the consent and assistance of Lambros' court-appointed attorney, CHARLES FAULKNER. Lambros was re-sentenced to thirty-eight (38) years, 30-year sentence with a 8-year term of supervised release, to be served upon release from imprisonment, thus a 38-year term. See, U.S. vs. ROBERTS, 5 F.3d 365, 369 (9th Cir. 1993). PLUS a CONSECUTIVE 5,357 DAY SENTENCE that he WAS NOT EXTRADITED ON, which was a breach of Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, which limits the maximum prison sentence to thirty (30) years in Brazil and DENIED his request to vacate three (3) other counts as per Brazilian law under the legal terms of Bis in Idem, Mutatis Mutandis, and the Principle of Subsidiarity, that have been granted to other Americans extradited from Brazil. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P. 2d 1293 (Wash. 1997) and AFFIRMED by the U. S. Supreme Court, 139 L.Ed.2d 608.
The following facts and proof of this case didn't support Brazil's extradition and treatment of Lambros. - You can't fit a square peg in a round hole. The peg simply won't fit. - When you don't have the law, you pound the facts. And when you don't have the facts you pound the law. If you don't have either, you pound the table. And that's what you've been seeing from Brazil since Lambros was arrested in 1991. But no matter how hard Brazil pounds, the peg still doesn't fit.
: Mr. Lambros offers proof as to the above sentence he received and the laws affecting same by offering the court document written and researched by the oldest and whom most consider the most prestigious law firm in Minnesota, BRIGGS AND MORGAN, P.A., dated August 15, 2000, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, et al, Civil No. 98-1621(DSD/JMM), U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota. The following first four (4) pages of the August 15, 2000, "PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' COMPREHENSIVE MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT" offers an excellent summary overview. You may download the entire 29 page document IN PDF FORMAT BY CLICKING HERE. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
The 1988 new constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil (Republica Federative do Brasil) clearly states within Title II, Fundamental Rights and Guarantees, Chapter I, Individual and Collective Rights and Duties, ARTICLE 5:Article 5. - All persons are equal before the law, without any distinction whatsoever, and Brazilians and foreigners resident in Brazil are assured of inviolability of the right to life, to liberty, to quality, to security and to property, on the following terms:
III: no one shall be submitted to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment;
IV: the expression of thought is free, and anonymity is forbidden;
V: the right to answer is ensured, in proportion to the offense, besides compensation for property or moral damages or damages to the image;
X: the privacy, private life, honor and image of person are inviolable, and the right to COMPENSATION for property or moral damages resulting from the violation thereof is ensured;
XXXIX: there is no crime without a previous law which defines it, nor is there any punishment without a previous legal imposition;
XL: THE PENAL LAW SHALL NOT BE RETROACTIVE, EXCEPT TO THE BENEFIT OF THE DEFENDANT; (How can the Treaty of Extradition Between the United States of America and the United States of Brazil, signed on January 13, 1961, be legal?)
XLI: the law shall punish any discrimination against fundamental rights and liberties;
XLVII: there shall be NO SENTENCE: b) of life imprisonment; e) which is cruel.
IXXIV: the State shall provide full and gratuitous legal assistance to whoever proves not to have sufficient funds;
LXXV: THE STATE SHALL INDEMNIFY A PERSON CONVICTED BY A JUDICIAL ERROR, AND ALSO A CONVICT WHO REMAINS IMPRISONED LONGER THU THE PERIOD ESTABLISHED IN THE SENTENCE;
LXXVII: Paragraph 2. - The rights and guarantees established in this Constitution DO NOT PRECLUDE others arising out of the regime and the principles adopted by it, or out of INTERNATIONAL TREATIES TO WHICH THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IS A PARTY.
DOWNLOAD ARTICLE 5 OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL HERE IN PDF.
Since Lambros' resentencing in 1997, the following legal events have occurred in brief and contained in total, as funds exist, within this web site:
1. June 1998, Lambros' COMMERCIAL LIEN and Declaratory Judgment/complaint against Attorney Faulkner for malpractice. On February 14, 2001, Judge David S. Doty gave Attorney Faulkner IMMUNITY. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeal upheld Judge Doty's ORDER without even reviewing Lambros' appeal brief on October 17, 2001.
2. June 13, 2000, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ORDERED Lambros to serve a consecutive 5,357 day sentence that he was not extradited on from Brazil.
3. April 13, 2001, MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDER BY JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b)(6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 28 USCA §455. On March 08, 2002, Judge David S. Doty dismissed Lambros' motion stating he did not have JURISDICTION. On April 10, 2002, Lambros filed a NOTICE OF APPEAL and MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.
4. August 09, 2001, Lambros requested U.S. Senator Charles Ernest Grassley and the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" to investigate his torture and illegal extradition from Brazil.
5. February 15, 2002, Lambros' complaint to the MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY as to the actions of Minnesota Attorneys PETER J. THOMPSON, JOSEPH T. WALBRAN, and ROBERT G. RENNER in 1976, that carries forward to this point in time. On April 12, 2002 Lambros' complaint was denied as to Attorneys THOMPSON and WALBRAN. On April 20, 2002, Lambros appealed the April 12, 2002 ORDER.
Lambros believes the current investigation by U.S. Senator Charles Ernest Grassley and the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" will expose and verify all facts contained within this web site. Thanking you in advance for reviewing and supporting the BOYCOTT BRAZIL web site.
PLEASE NOTE: "Guimaraes, 58, faces NO MORE
THAN 30 YEARS IN PRISON - THE MAXIMUM JAIL
SENTENCE ALLOWED UNDER BRAZIL LAW." [Article
75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code]WHY WAS JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS GIVEN A MANDATORY
LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE WHEN BRAZILIAN LAW
DOESN'T ALLOW SAME???The following letter from MARTIN SHAW PANG'S lawyers in the U.S. and Brazil to Lambros proves that the MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE COCAINE in Brazil carries a sentence of THREE (3) to TEN (10) YEARS. Therefore, the Brazilian Supreme Court should of specified that Lambros must not be sentenced to prison for more than TEN (10) YEARS. The U.S. District Court did not follow "The Doctrine of Dual Criminality" either. It appears Lambros, attorneys in Brazil must of obtained there law license within a Cracker Jacks box.
Click here to view STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293 (Wash. 1997) opinion which proves Lambros was not given any type of law in Brazil. This opinion was affirmed by the Supreme Court.
TREATIES DO NOT SUPERSEDE THE CONSTITUTION: By the Constitution of the United States a treaty is made of like obligation as an act of legislation; both are declared to be the supreme law of the land; and NO SUPERIOR EFFICACY IS GIVEN TO EITHER OVER THE OTHER. See, WHITNEY vs. ROBERTSON, 124 US 190, 8 S Ct 456, 31 L Ed. 386 (1888). A treaty CANNOT change the CONSTITUTION or be held valid if in violation thereof. See, BOUDINOT vs. UNITED STATES (The Cherokee Tobacco) 11 Wall 616, 20 L. Ed. 227 and THOMAS vs. GAY, 169 US 264, 18 S. Ct. 340, 42 L. Ed. 740 (1898). When a treaty is inconsistent with a subsequent act of Congress the latter will prevail. See, RAINEY vs. U.S., 232 US 310, 34 S. Ct. 429, 58 L. Ed. 617 (1914). An act of Congress prevails over an earlier treaty so far as they cannot be reasonably harmonized, although an intent to abrogate a treaty will not be lightly attributed to Congress. See, U.S. vs. PAYNE, 264 US 446, 44 S. Ct. 352, 68 L. Ed. 782 (1924). Where the provisions of a treaty and a subsequent act of Congress ARE IN CONFLICT, the Act of Congress WILL CONTROL IN THE COURTS of the United States as the later expression of the municipal law of the United States. See, PIGEON RIVER IMPROV. S. & BOOM CO. vs. CHARLES W. COX, 291 US 138, 54 S. Ct. 361, 78 L. Ed. 695 (1934). Under the Constitution, the treaty power CANNOT OVERRIDE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS RESPECTING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, REID vs. COVERT, 354 US 1, 16-17, 77 S.Ct. 1222 1230, 1 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1957). See, ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK vs. STATE OF N.Y., 860 F.2d 1145, 1163 (2nd Cir. 1988). PLEASE NOTE: The Treaty of Extradition Between the United States of America and the UNITED STATES OF BRAZIL was signed on January 13, 1961, entered into force on December 17, 1964, 15 U.S.T. 2093; T.I.A.S. No. 5691; Additional Protocol to Treaty, signed on June 18, 1962, entered into force on December 17, 1964, 15 U.S.T. 2112; T.I.A.S. No. 5691. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1330 fn. 22, 1334, and 1354 fn. 1 (Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc 1997), cert. denied, 139 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997). In 1964 military leaders of Brazil took control of the Brazilian Government and Brazil's government was returned to civilian rule in 1985. In 1986, Brazilians elected a new Congress and new state legislatures and governors in the FIRST nationwide general election after military rule ended. See, WORLD BOOK ENCYCLOPEDIA, (2002), Volume 2, page 586. The 1988 NEW CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL abolished the president's former power to rule by decree. Legislative power is exercised by the National Congress (Congresso Nacional), which consists of a 487-member Chamber of Deputies (Camara dos Deputados) and a 72-member Senate (Senado). The 1988 NEW CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL provided for direct elections every five years to the country's most powerful political position, the presidency. Brazil's judiciary is headed by a FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, whose 11 members ARE APPOINTED BY THE PRESIDENT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE SENATE. See, THE NEW ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, (1993)(Micropaedia), Vol. 2, page 488. Both ENCYCLOPEDIA'S state that Brazil's OFFICIAL NAME IS: REPUBLICA FEDERATIVO do BRASIL (Federative Republic of Brazil). WHY DOES THE TREATY USE THE NAME "UNITED STATES OF BRAZIL"???? It is clear that the 1988 NEW CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL reaffirmed Article 5, clause XLVII(b), that there will be no life sentence in Brazil and the legal norm consolidated by Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, which limits the maximum prison sentence to thirty (30) years. See, STATE vs. PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1345 and 1352 (This Article limits the prison sentence time, conforming exactly with the present constitutional dictamen, as it was the case with the Constitutions [Brazil] of 1937 (Article 122, 13), 1946 (Article 41 Par. 31 and 1969 Article 153 Par. 1) which prohibited life sentences. Now, if that is the case, how can we give up a constitutional precept in face of a request for the extradition of an individual who one way or another, subjects himself to Brazilian Laws?) Id. at 1345-1346. LAMBROS COULD NOT BE EXTRADITED TO THE UNITED STATES LEGALLY.
DOING BUSINESS IN BRAZIL, by Brazilian Attorney PINHEIRO NETO, (1991) offers an excellent overview into THE BRAZILIAN LEGAL SYSTEM. Attorney PINHEIRO NETO'S book is in english and published by Matthew Bender & Company. Of interest are the following: (1) "In the field of CRIMINAL LAW, the principle IN DUBIO PRO REO (i.e. any doubt shall be resolved in favor of the defendant) has been fully recognized and applied by the courts. See, §1.133; (2) "In the international sphere, the Code of Civil Procedure provides that the Brazilian Courts have jurisdiction when: (i) the defendant, WHATEVER HIS NATIONALITY, IS DOMICILED IN BRAZIL; ..." See, §1.140; (3) "Finally, the Code provides that an action brought before a foreign court does not prevent the Brazilian Courts from hearing the same action and any others connected with it." See, §1.141; (3) "The Federal Constitution enacted on Oct. 5, 1988 has created the Superior Court of Justice, which is, in fact, a third level of ordinary jurisdiction. On April 7, 1989, the Superior Court of Justice was inaugurated and began its activities, as established in Law No. 7746 of March 30, 1989. The Superior Court of Justice will, inter alia, judge at the special appeal level decisions that (i) CONTRAVENE A TREATY OR FEDERAL LAW, OR DENY THE EFFECTIVENESS THEREOF; ...." See, §1.145 (4) "The lower jurisdiction is exercised by the STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS, by the puisne judges who have competence to hear CASES AT FIRST INSTANCE. See, §1.147 IN 1991, JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS WAS NEVER SEEN BY A JUDGE WITHIN A STATE OR FEDERAL COURT IN Rio DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL WHEN HE WAS ARRESTED AND ILLEGALLY TAKEN TO BRASILIA, BRAZIL TO BE TORTURED AND SEEN BY THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT. WHY WAS THE SUPREME COURT THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE???????
Here is the July 17, 1992 (07/17/92) RADIOLOGICAL CONSULTATION REQUEST/REPORT of John Gregory Lambros by the U.S. Bureau Prisons Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota, which states, "In the lateral views there appear to be clusters of punctate radiopaque foreign bodies...."
HERE IS THE JULY 17, 1992 (07/17/92) x-ray of John Gregory Lambros by the U.S. Bureau of Prisons Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota, that shows the clusters of PUNCTATE RADIOPAQUE FOREIGN BODIES. BRAIN CONTROL IMPLANTS.
CLICK HERE to download this x-ray in PDF. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THE X-RAY. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
February 24, 1995 letter from Glen E. Nichols to Attorney Jeffrey L. Orren as to Mr. Nichols review of John G. Lambros' X-rays dated 07-17-92, and the other dated 07-27-92. Mr. Nichols states, "However, I saw two sets of 'clusters of punctate radiopaque foreign bodies.' They were in two separate clusters; one approximately two (2) inches above and slightly forward from the ear canal, in the area known as the AUDITORY AREA of the temporal lobe cerebral cortex; a second cluster approximately one (1) inch frontal to the above cluster in the area known as the SPEECH AREA or BROCA'S AREA of the frontal lobe cerebral cortex. I used a magnification lens, and there appear to be approximately 10 to 15 radiopaque objects within each cluster, each object is about 1 millimeter (.039), or less, in diameter. The objects are clustered in two separate groups and within a diameter for each group of approximately 1 centimeter (.39 inch). I viewed the 07-17-92 X-ray of John G. Lambros with a Christian minister familiar with X-ray material. He also saw several identifiable radiopaque bodies in the two separate clusters in the X-ray." This letter is a total of two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 24, 1995, GLEN E. NICHOLS' LETTER TO ATTORNEY ORREN HERE IN PDF.
December 20, 2001, letter from LAMBROS to Glen E. Nichols, regarding the release of the NICHOLS February 24, 1995 letter. This letter is a total of two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SITE BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 20, 2001 LAMBROS LETTER TO GLEN E. NICHOLS HERE IN PDF.
April 12, 2002, letter from LAMBROS to Glen E. Nichols, as to his FINAL NOTICE to Lambros to remove all letters and documents related to Nichols from the Boycott Brazil web site. Please note that Lambros requests Nichols to have the Central District of California, U.S. Attorneys Office to prosecute Lambros for violations of Title 18, USCA §1001, as to Lambros' willful filing of false statements as to the X-rays of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons. WHY DOESN'T ANYONE WANT TO PROSECUTE OR FILE CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST LAMBROS FOR ANYTHING WITHIN HIS BOYCOTT BRAZIL WEB SITE?? COULD IT POSSIBLY BE THAT ALL FACTS AND LAW ARE TRUE??? This letter and exhibit is a total of two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD APRIL 12, 2002 LAMBROS LETTER TO GLEN E. NICHOLS HERE IN PDF.
In 1995, Author Alex Constantine stated within his book PSYCHIC DICTATORSHIP IN THE U.S.A., "Is it possible, asks John Lambros, a prisoner at Leavenworth and mind control experimentee (a claim he corroborates with an X-ray of four strand-shaped foreign objects in his head) that the particle beam intended for enemy missiles alone might now be intended for human minds?" See, Page 43. 1 would strongly suggest reading Mr. Constantine's book, as it offers an excellent overview on mind control technology, "Masers, not lasers, are the hidden thrust of "Star Wars." The weapon is an extremely sophisticated mind and body machine capable of thought transfer, manipulation of emotions and muscle control. Images, even dreams, can be beamed to the subject. A human or cybernetic controller can carry on a conversation telepathically, and at the same time instill physical sensations, subliminal commands, emotions and visual and aural hallucinations. Computerized EM devices that talk and transmit images to the brain were current when Reagan delivered his first SDI pitch in 1983 . . . . The Microwave Mafia often rely on the implantation of miniaturized radio receivers. The technique known as intracerebral control and uses radio or ultra-sound. It was developed by the CIA's MKDRACO and HATTER brain telemetry projects. The implantation of a micro-receiver in the frontal or temporal lobes by trained teams of operatives is done with an encaphalator,' usually through the sinuses of a drugged subject. But the current state of art in Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control (RHIC) depends upon 'Personal Radio and Electromagnetic Frequency Allocation,' or PREMA a frequency unique to the subject's brain. A 'READING WAND' is hidden near the victim, who is scanned by an instrument smaller than a briefcase. Once the 'Freak' is determined,. the brain becomes a link in a cybernetic system, and the subject (or a group" can communicate, be surveilled, guided, manipulated, harassed or controlled from afar." See, Pages 43 and 44.
If you would like to review the court ordered January 19, 1994, COMPETENCY EVALUATION OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, which was conducted by Dr. Kenneth J. Criqui, a holder of multiple Ph.D.'s, please click here. Please note that Dr. Criqui stated within his January 19, 1994, "ADDENDUM TO COMPETENCY EVALUATION JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS," on Page 2, "The government could not have done a better job of instilling fear and paranoia in Mr. Lambros had they hired a psychiatrist to plan this out. First Mr. Lambros was sent to FMC Rochester. The FIRST X-RAY SHOWED SOMETHING, AND WHILE THE SECOND SHOWED NOTHING, IT IS PLAIN AND EVIDENT THAT THE SECOND X-RAY WAS TAKEN AT A DIFFERENT INTENSITY SETTING AND IS THEREFORE QUITE INVALID TO C014PARE TO THE FIRST. HOW BETTER TO MAKE THE SUBJECT THINK THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS JUST INVOLVED IN "ANOTHER ONE OF ITS COVER-UPS'?."
UNITED STATES SENATOR CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" INVESTIGATE JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' TORTURE AND EXTRADITION FROM BRAZIL.
THE UNITED STATES SENATE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" HAS JURISDICTION ON ALL UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURTS AND JUDGES. U.S. SENATOR CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY SITS ON THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY."
1. On August 09, 2001 JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS mailed a two (2) page letter and eighty-one (81) page AFFIDAVIT (including exhibits) to United States Senator Charles Ernest Grassley for his review, investigation and presentment to the United States Senate "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." The documents were received by Senator Grassley's office on August 14, 2001. You may download the following documents in PDF FORMAT: a) copy of the U.S. Postal Service Return Receipt confirming U.S. Senator Grassley's receipt of LAMBROS' letter and affidavit on August 14, 2001. This document is one (1) page; b) LAMBROS' August 09, 2001 letter to Senator Grassley. This document is two (2) pages; c) LAMBROS' August 09, 2001, AFFIDAVIT to the United States Senate "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY."
This document is eighty-one (81) pages with exhibits. Please note that LAMBROS has numbered each page of the AFFIDAVIT in long-hand in the lower right hand corner of each page, 1 thru 81, to ensure readers that pages and exhibits don't get mixed-up. CLICK BELOW to view these pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT TO U.S. SENATOR CHARLES E. GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF.
The following is a copy of the FIRST PAGE OF LAMBROS' AUGUST 09, 2001 AFFIDAVIT TO THE UNITED STATES SENATE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." Please note the names of those within the coverup.
JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS,
Petitioner,vs.
ROBERT G. RENNER, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota and formerly U.S. Attorney for Minnesota from 1969 to 1977; JOSEPH T. WALBRAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota in 1976; GLENN BASKFIELD, U.S. Parole/Probation Officer in the District of Minnesota in 1976; PETER THOMPSON, Private Attorney that represented John G. Lambros in 1976 thru 1979; EDWARD J. DEVITT, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota in 1976; THOMAS B. HEFFELFINGER, U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota in 1992; DOUGLAS R. PETERSON, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota in 1992; AUDREY CARLSON, Employee in the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota on December 17, 1992; CHARLES W. FAULKNER, Private Attorney that represented John G. Lambros in 1992 thru 1994; JAMES L. PROPOTNICK, Deputy U.S. Marshall for the District of Minnesota in 1976; DONALD E. NELSON, Special Agent of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration in 1976 within the District of Minnesota; JAMES P. BRASETH, Special Agent of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration in 1976 within the District of Minnesota; LEON A. CHENEY, Deputy U.S. Marshall for the District of Minnesota in 1976; JOHN DOES, #1 thru 30; JANE DOES, #1 thru 30;,
Defendants.
AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY
LAMBROS, Reg. No. 00436-124,
United States Penitentiary
Leavenworth, P.O. Box 1000,
Leavenworth, Kansas 66048-1000 USA
Web site: www.brazilboycott.orgIN RE: Criminal Indictments and Judgment from the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, U.S.A. vs. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS,:
1. CR-3-75-128;
2. CR-3-76-17;
3. CR-3-76-54;
4. CR-4-89-82(5).This Affidavit is dated:
August 09, 2001STATE OF KANSAS
COUNTY OF LEAVENWORTH
SS: AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS
2. March 20, 2002, ADDENDUM TO AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT OF LAMBROS TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES E. GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter is 3 pages with 29 pages of exhibits being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Total of 35 pages)
DOWNLOAD MARCH 20, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER To U.S. SENATOR GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF.
3. September 20, 2002, SECOND ADDENDUM TO AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES E. GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter is 3 pages with 5 pages of exhibits, total 8 pages, being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 20, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO U.S. SENATOR GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF.
4. November 25, 2002, letter from Lambros to CHADWICK GROOVER, a staff member of Senator Charles E. Grassley and the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter was written at the request of CHADWICK GROOVER as per his conversation with the Lambros family. This letter is two (2) pages in length with eight (8) pages of exhibits, total of 10 pages, being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 25, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO CHADWICK GROOVER HERE IN PDF.
CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS
POST FREE CLASSIFIED ADS, BUSINESS DIRECTORY LISTING AND YELLOW PAGE LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS - WITHIN 50 COUNTRIES. SEARCHING FOR A SPECIAL ITEM? SEARCH OVER 35 MILLION CLASSIFIED ADS WITH OVER 500,000 NEW ADS DAILY!!! Visite: www.NoPayClassifieds.com.
PLEASE VISIT the FACEBOOK listing for Boycott Brazil at: http://tinyurl.com/boycottbrazilPLEASE VISIT the FACEBOOK listing for NoPayClassifieds.com at: http://tinyurl.com/NoPayClassifieds
No Pay Classifieds - Boycott Brazil has launched a FREE classified advertising site in August 2007, within 50 global markets, an experiment the company says could lead to new sources of support and revenue. The FREE classified ads and want ads allow for the display of one (1) color photo and a maximum of 150 words to describe the item(s) or service. "We are the think globally, act locally, FREE classified ad and want ad community," said John Gregory Lambros, President and Founder. Our mission is very simple, "free help to billions of people in locating jobs, housing, and just about anything else within their neighborhood or over one million neighborhoods throughout the world - all for FREE." Please help us spread the word by telling a friend and placing a free ad within No Pay Classifieds. It will take all of five minutes. THANK YOU!!!! PLEASE VISIT: www.NoPayClassifieds.com
PLEASE VISIT "BRAZIL LEGAL SHYSTERS." The web site designed to expose transgressions by Brazilian Judges and Lawyers. Web site: BrazilShysters.BoycottBrazil.com
PLEASE VISIT "BRAZIL LIEN ACCOUNT." The web site designed to expose the $500 BILLION COMMERCIAL LIEN (U.S.) DEFAULTED BY FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and Others by Operation of Law. Web site: BrazilLien.BoycottBrazil.com
PLEASE VISIT "BOYCOTT SOYBEANS FROM BRAZIL." The website idesigned to expose Brazil's attempt to kill the United States soybean industry by "DUMPING" and "FLOODING" the United States with cheaply produced soybeans. Web site: BrazilSoybeans.BoycottBrazil.com
PLEASE VISIT "LEGAL NOTICE OF FRAUD AND DECEIT BY ATTORNEY COLIA F. CEISEL." The web site designed to expose Minnesota Attorney Colia F. Ceisel for placing John Gregory Lambros in prison for 25 years while supposedly defending him. Web site: FraudByCeisel.BoycottBrazil.com
PLEASE VISIT "MINNESOTA LEGAL SHYSTERS." The web site designed to expose transgressions by Minnesota Judges and Lawyers. Web site: LegalShysters.BoycottBrazil.com
PLEASE VISIT "SCHIZOPHRENIA or MIND CONTROL." The web site designed to question doctors who have labeled 2 million Americans with schizophrenia. Web site: FalseBeliefs.BoycottBrazil.com
FREE AMERICAN NEWSMAGAZINE - The Free American is committed to bringing the truth to the American People with an editorial policy that is unabashedly, pro-American. Web site: www.freeamerican.com
FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION - www.famm.org
2600 MAGAZINE - Excellent articles from the hacker perspective, that is, written with a sense of "what happens if you do this instead of what everyone else on the planet does" and not from the perspective of what you SHOULD do or else. Web site: www.2600.com
MOTHER JONES MAGAZINE - A magazine for people who think freely and care deeply, with a focus on values of social justice, fairness, and community. Journalism that is fearless, accurate, thought provoking, and free of commercial pressures and political cant. Web site: www.motherjones.com
infoUSA Inc. - Database on people, businesses and businesses credit reports. Web site: www.infoUSA.com
DEMOCRACY NOW - The resistance radio program from the Pacifica Foundation. Web site: www.democracynow.org
GREENPEACE - Why surf when you can make waves? Web site: www.greenpeace.org
AIG - The insurance company JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS wished he had been covered by when he visited BRAZIL for the business opportunity that has cost him his life. AIG does things others can't with WORLDRISK coverage. AIG's insurance coverage insures you against KIDNAPPING, RANSOM, and EXTORTION, and provides for emergency medical assistance. AIG's greatest strength lies in the ability to grasp the intricacies of a foreign culture and NEGOTIATE FOREIGN LAW. Web site: www.AIG.com
LOBSTER - The LOBSTER newsletter by Robin Ramsay is published twice a year, June and December, offering an overview on the British security and intelligence services. It also has tracked global mind control programs and the nightmares attached to same. To order a copy of the LOBSTER, email: robin@lobster.karoo.co.uk
DRUG REFORM COORDINATION NETWORK - DRCNet offers purely educational articles as to the global legalization of drugs. Web site: www.drcnet.org
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL - Could spam be the new weapon against human rights abuses? Amnesty International's Fast Action Stops Torture network aims to hit despots where it hurts - in their in-boxes. FAST alerts arrive by email, pager, cell phone, or PDA whenever a political prisoner is believed to be in imminent danger; you log in at www.amnestyusa.org/fast and fire off a prewritten letter. The site provides background on each case, plus the option to alter the letter's language if you wish. Currently a network of more than 80,000 volunteers are part of the Urgent Action Network, which began in 1972. Web site: www.amnestyusa.orgtCellPals - Specializes in web development for prisoners, by offering services such as personal homepages, displays of prisoner artwork and poetry, and penpal ads. Web site: www.cellpals.comNEXUS MAGAZINE - Excellent magazine from Australia that reports on Mind Control. Web site: www.nexusmagazine.com
COUNTRYSIDE. Web site: www.countrysidemag.com
RESURRECTION CONSTITUTIONAL NEWSLETTER AND FAX NETWORK - When you want to hear the other side of the story by the people who were there, you need to subscribe to the Resurrection Newsletter and the Resurrection Fax Back System for immediate information on stories glossed over by the media and insight into the spin. The monthly newsletter is 20 to 40 plus pages. Sample issue of the latest edition is $5.00. Contact Editor Sheila M. Reynolds, P.O. Box 601, Cornville, Arizona 86325. E-Mail: rnfn@mtcarmel.everyl.ne
"THIS BANK ROBBER'S LIFE" is a book that tells the story of one of the most notorious--not to mention, one of the most colorful-outlaws of our generation. Patrick "Paddy" Mitchell has been featured on the TV shows: America's Most Wanted, Unsolved Mysteries, Street Stories With Ed Braldley, Amazing Capers, A&E Biographies, Dateline NBC .... You've read about him in numerous newspapers and magazines, two full length books, and the Hollywood movie, "Point Break" was based on a short interval of his life. (He is the character portrayed by Patrick Swayze in the movie. And "No" he did not perish riding that monstrous wave in Australia; he lived to tell the story!) The book is available only on the web at: www.paddymitchell.com.
Note: Paddy Mitchell is a strong advocate of John Lambros in his quest to BOYCOTT BRAZIL!
Return to top of index : www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html
FOR DOCUMENTATION START READING
Congress Asleep at the Switch Again, The Phoenix Letter, Antony C. Sutton, August, 1995. The lead article in this issue details the gruesome assault, torture, and forced implantation of U.S. citizen and businessman John Gregory Lambros.
Gate Keepers for Corruption, The Phoenix Letter, Editor Antony C. Sutton, October 1995. A second article by the Phoenix Letter that presents uncovered State Department documents as to the cover-up by Brazilian and U.S. Officials as to torture and denial of due process to John Gregory Lambros.
JOHN G. LAMBROS' OPEN LETTER RESPONSE TO DR. SUTTON'S LETTER RECEIVED ON APRIL 17, 2000. (3 pages in length)
APPENDIX I. Covert Operations of the U.S. National Security Agency. John St. Clair Akwei vs. National Security Agency, Fort George G. Meade, MD., USA (Civil Action #92-0449). Evidence from the lawsuit filed at the U.S. Courthouse in Washington, D.C. as to the NSA's structure, national security activities, proprietary technologies and covert operations to monitor individual persons globally. This lawsuit brief was printed in its entirety in NEXUS MAGAZINE, April-May 1996. The attached information was taken from APPENDIX 1, of TEXE MARRS book PROJECT L.U.C.I.D. Texe Marrs is a retired career U.S. Air Force Officer that commanded communications-electronics and engineering units around the globe. Texe Marrs states on page 97, "My own pioneering work in this field dates from the mid-1970s, when I first began my in-depth research into the complex, and fascinating, subject of MIND CONTROL THROUGH IMPLANTED, COMPUTER DEVICES IN HUMAN BEINGS." Also, on page 98 and 99, "Even as I wrote MEGA FORCES, I was becoming aware of super-secret experiments by government and corporate laboratories in which HUMAN SUBJECTS - usually unwilling and unsuspecting GUINEA PIGS - WERE HAVING COMPUTER CHIPS AND TRANSMITTING DEVICES IMPLANTED INTO THEIR CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES (e.g. their brains), auditory (ear) organ, and elsewhere in their bodies." Marrs offers further evidence on page 104 of PROJECT L.U.C.I.D. by stating, "GLENN KRAWCZYK, for example, in an article in NEXUS MAGAZINE [February/March 1993, pp. 41-46] entitled, "MIND CONTROL AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER," provides documented evidence of MIND CONTROL, biomedical devices implanted in human beings. He also presents a detailed bibliography of source references."
Press Release: A Blanket of Silence, April, 1996
Boycott of Brazilian coffee due to the torture of American citizen John Gregory Lambros. A letter from Lambros to the Chief Executive Officer of Wal-Mart Stores
Anyone Out There Have Implants?
April 13, 1996 memo listing Lambros' educational background
CYBERGODS MANUSCRIPT, is a 1996 release by Lennart Lindqvist, Evamarie Taylor, and Robert Naeslund of Gruppen, Box 136, 114-79, Stockholm, Sweden. The 28 page manuscript is a tiny part of a significantly more extensive research report and material within the Computer-Brain Report that offers studies and x-ray evidence of humans implanted with radio-transmitters in their heads and brains illegally by police in various countries globally. John Gregory Lambros' family attorney mailed Gruppen his U.S. Bureau of Prisons x-ray that were authenticated by doctors in Sweden as to implants in the right side of Lambros' head, behind his ear. The Swedish doctors report stated, "There appear to be clusters of punctate radiopaque foreign bodies . . . These objects have absolutely no natural origin and are most probably some kind of TRANSMITTERS . . . Moreover, in the frontal lobes, there are large dark spots which have been caused by oxygen deficiency. Reduced oxygen balance is a normal consequence of radiowaves penetration of biological tissue through the heat-energy and dehydrating effects of the electro-magnetic energies. Oxygen deficiency can also cause a change in physiological conditions and has a detrimental effect on health." Lambros' x-ray appears on page 9 of CYBERGODS. This document is 28 pages in length and will take a varying amount of time to download depending on your connection. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT CYBERGODS. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT IN PDF
MICROWAVES AND MIND CONTROL, by Dr. Rosalie Bertell, which appeared within the Summer 2000, LOBSTER 39. The article offers excellent reference web sites. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT MICROWAVES AND MIND CONTROL. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT IN PDF
"PLAYING THOSE MIND GAMES," Chapter 53 from THE SIXTY GREATEST CONSPIRACIES OF ALL TIME, by Jonathan Vankin and John Whalen. A Citadel Press Book Published by Carol Publishing Group. This chapter, pages 401 thru 406 offers excellent background information on the U.S. Government funding the STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE ESP project, Dr. Jose Delgado developed "a small three-channel stimulator which can be placed subcutaneously . . . The instrument is solid state, has no batteries and can work indefinitely." In other words, a BRAIN IMPLANT, and the UFO abduction scenario perfect cover-up for government mind control implant programs. This document is six (6) pages in length. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON OFFENSIVE MICROWAVE WEAPONS, Managing Director, Harlan Girard. Attached for your review is the May 31, 2000 letter from Harlan Girard to LAMBROS and Lambros' June 7, 2000 letter in response to same. Mr. Girard is allegedly an expert in the area of brain-control implants but has done NOTHING to assist Lambros since 1996 when he first contacted Lambros offering information as to global government use of brain-control implantation. The two letters and copy of the envelope are three (3) pages in length. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD HARLAN GIRARD DOCUMENT IN PDF HERE.
THREE (3) TYPES OF PROCURED METHODS OF MIND CONTROL at its highest performance utilization are as follows: 1. E.D.O.M. (Electronic Dissolution of Memory); 2. E.E.O.M. (Electronic Enhancement of Memory); 3. R.H.I.C. (Radio Hypnotic Intra-Cerebal Control). RHIC techniques call for the implantation of a microsized radio receiver .... The procedure involves the insertion of the micro-receiver or transceiver (allows 2-way communications) into the desired areas such as the frontal lobe or temporal lobe (as in brain) of the subject in question. This information is contained within the article entitled "SECRET WEAPONS AGAINST TERROR" Is the Military Quietly Deploying More Exotic Tools of Warfare? by John Kettler, which appeared in the January/February 2002, ATLANTIS RISING. The article documents the writing of Dr. Andrija Puharich, Dr. Rauni Leena Kilde (the former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, Norio Hayakawa, and Lt. Col. Tom Bearden. This article is four (4) PDF PAGES. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD ATLANTIS RISING JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2002 ARTICLE IN PDF HERE.
The following diagrams offer a sketch of the "FIELD CHAIR" and "FIELD CUBE" that are used for DEPATTERNING - DEMAGNETIZING A HUMAN. The supporter of John G. Lambros that offers the sketches does not want to be identified at this time. The sketches are offered in PDF. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO DOWNLOAD. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD DIAGRAMS OF "FIELD CHAIR AND "FIELD CUBE" IN PDF HERE.
JOHN FLEMING offers background information on the more than 200 working surveillance satellites used by governments around the world, "Black Bag" technology, within his article entitled "The Shocking Menace of satellite surveillance." The article was written for Pravda.Ru. Of special interest is the fact that lead-shielding may allow you to escape monitoring by a satellite. John Fleming is a writer and author of a book, "The War of all Against All." The 4 page article is offered in PDF. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO DOWNLOAD. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD JOHN FLEMING ARTICLE IN PDF HERE.
"BRANDED BY THE SECURITY POLICE", by Robert Naeslund of GRUPPEN, Box 136, 114-79, Stockholm, Sweden, Fax 08-668-60-66. This is a fourteen (14) page document written by Robert Naeslund as to his forced violent sedating by Swedish Security Police (SAPO), at which time they placed THREE (3) IMPLANTED RADIOTRANSMITTERS WITHIN HIS SKULL (frontal lobe). Mr. Naeslund offers x-rays of the radio-transmitters and verification of the radio-transmitters, R.H.I.C. AND E.D.O.M. - - Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebal Control and Electronic Dissolution of Memory, by United States Medical Doctors. The following PDF download may not offer clear pictures of the x-rays offered within BRANDED BY THE SECURITY POLICE, thus I suggest you contract Gruppen at the above address for first generation copy. Please support Robert Naeslund. Thank you. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD "BRANDED BY THE SECURITY POLICE" DOCUMENT IN PDF HERE.
NAPA SENTINEL articles by Harry V. Martin and David Caul, Series 10, November 5, 1991, "SOVIETS, U.S. BOTH USING MIND CONTROL METHODS"; Series 11, November 8, 1991, (continuation of Series 10); and Series 12, November 19, 1991, "MIND CONTROL ORIGINS FOUND IN NAZI GERMANY." The articles offer an EXCELLENT OVERVIEW OF MIND CONTROL. The scientists who pioneered the work were Dr. Jose Delgado, Dr. W. Ross Adey and Dr. Wilder Penfield with the guidance of Dr. Ivor Browning. Radio receiver-amplifer(s) where wired into the hypothalamus of the brain of animals and humans. The CIA utilized the technique for getting trained pigeons to fly miniature transmitters to the ledge of KGB safe houses where the devices monitored conversations for months. Dr. Elizabeth Rauscher, director of Technic Research Laboratory stated, "Give me the money and three months," she says, "and I'll be able to affect the behavior of eighty percent (80%) of the people in this town without their knowing it." According to Lincoln Lawrence, author of WERE WE CONTROLLED?, EDOM is now operational. "There is already in use a small EDOM generator-transmitter which can be concealed on the body of the person ..." The articles are a total of five (5) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD NAPA SENTINEL ARTICLES BY HARRY V. MARTIN AND DAVID CAUL HERE IN PDF.
PICKERING IMPLANT: Please download X-ray picture of what's known as a PICKERING IMPLANT within the brain of Mr. Petit, as confirmed by his Miami, Florida attorney Roy Gelber. Petit was known as a drug pilot and called "burn 'em" by DEA officials in 1982. U.S. Bureau of Prisons Dr. Hill stated to Lambros on November 1, 1995, that the PICKERING IMPLANT is reportedly capable of sending and receiving signals. This in a one (1) page PDF DOCUMENT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD X-RAY OF PICKERING IMPLANT IN MR. PETIT HERE IN PDF.
CHRISTIAN INQUIRER, March 1985, "TINY BRAIN COMPUTER MODIFIES BEHAVIOR." Dr. Sigmund Gieriech and Britain's "Whitehall Scientific Institute for the Betterment of Humanity," placed the tiny computer snugly at the base of the brain of three (3) prisoners at Birmingham's maximum security Rehabilitation Center to see if their behavior patterns can be fixed. The little computer monitors brainwaves. "Whenever a THOUGHT PASSES THROUGH WHICH HAS A CRIMINAL INTENT, IT SENDS OUT A QUICK JOLT OF ELECTRICITY to remind the person that they must not do whatever it is they are thinking about." The device is called an ELECTRO COMPUTER BRAIN ENHANCER (ECBE) and Dr. Ormond Shell had one installed, "I don't even know that it's in my head." The article is one (1) page in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Prison Superintendent MAXWELL PRIMM notes, "With the device installed, they [prisoners] have not been able to break a single prison rule.")
DOWNLOAD MARCH 1985 ARTICLE BY CHRISTIAN INQUIRER, HERE IN PDF.
THE CONTROLLERS, by Mediaecco, Box 136, 114-79 Stockholm, Sweden. This article offers an overview of the abduction phenomenon used by the government to cover-up intracerebral implants visible in the X-rays and MRI scans of many UFO abductees. Of notable interest is the work of Dr. Delgado, Dr. Robert G. Heath, of Tulane University who implanted as many as 125 electrodes in a subjects brain in the 1960's, Dr. James Olds, Dr. John Lilly, Dr. Ralph Schwitzgelbel, Dr. Bryan Robinson of the Yerkes primate laboratory, Dr. Antoine Remond, Dr. Robert Becker. Mediaecco also offers an overview of active authors of Mind Control including Walter Bowart, author of "Operation Mind Control", former FBI agent Ted Gunderson and Alexander Constantine. The article is five (5) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD "THE CONTROLLERS", HERE IN PDF.
UNDERGROUND ALIEN BASES, by Abelard Productions, Inc, 1990 First printing, offers an excellent overview on MIND MANIPULATION EXPERIMENTS by D.A.R.P.A. (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) at the Dulce Base, Sandia Base by THE JASON GROUP (of 55 Scientists), and Area 51 in Nevada (Dreamland, 'Data Repository Establishment and Maintenance Land'). The book states that the U.S. Government cloned individuals and instilled programming via implants through regular RF transmissions. Also that many humans are also being IMPLANTED with brain transceivers using two procedures: R.H.I.C. (Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control) and E.D.O.M. (Electronic Dissolution of Memory) The brain transceiver is inserted into the head through the nose. These devices are used in the SOVIET UNION AND THE UNITED STATES, AS WELL AS SWEDEN. The Swedish Prime Minister PALME gave the National Swedish Police Board the right in 1973 to insert brain transmitters into the heads of human beings COVERTLY! Attached for your review are pages 34, 35, 36, and 37 from UNDERGROUND ALIEN BASES in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD PAGES 34, 35, 36, AND 37 FROM UNDERGROUND ALIEN BASES HERE IN PDF.
THE ALIENS AND THE SCALPEL, by Roger K. Leir, D.P.M., is the documented true story of one surgeon's research into the retrieval and analysis of WHAT SEEMS to be alien or government implants in humans. Interesting facts include, "As of this writing in August 1998, NBC has just completed filming the eighth surgical process." Page 183; Whitley Strieber thought he had an implant in his ear. Page 107; Brazilian implant victims would turn their faces upward, mouths taut with lips that trembled and eyes filled with tears. Page 133; "Three of the surgeries consisted of the removal of a skin lesion with an ATTACHED SMALL BB-SIZED, GREYISH-WHITE ROUND BALL IN THE UNDERLYING SOFT TISSUE." Page 163.; "The seventh case was totally devoid of biological findings, but it did PRODUCE A CRYSTALLINE OR GLASSLIKE OBJECT. The eighth case produced another CANTELOUPE-SEED-LIKE OBJECT, SIMILAR TO EARLIER ONES." Page 163. "Only one person with an object in the body stated prior to surgery that he was able to HEAR VOICES and attributed this to the foreign object." Page 163; "The samples were small rodlike materials one to two mm. in diameter and less than one cm. in length." Page 166; "The T-shaped object is composed of two small metallic rods" Page 170; "One end is in the shape of a barb, while the opposite end is flat." Page 170; "One such theory pertains to the objects' abilities to act as TRACKING DEVICES OR TRANSPONDERS, thus enabling the subject to be found anywhere on the globe. Another possibility is that they may act as behavior-controlling devices. We know that abductees seem to have compulsive behaviors." "... WE MONITOR OUR ASTRONAUTS WHEN TREY ARE IN SPACE." Pages 170 and 171. Attached for your review are pages 105, 106, 107, 132, 133, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, and 171 from THE ALIENS AND THE SCALPEL. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. It appears that Dr. Roger Leir has produced a video and DVD with STARGATE PRODUCTIONS with great close-ups of the process of surgical removal and of the implants themselves. The video and DVD is available at there web site: www.alienscalpel.com
DOWNLOAD PAGES FROM THE ALIENS AND THE SCALPEL HERE IN PDF.
December 31, 2004, Whitley Strieber reported in his free newsletter "UNKNOWN COUNTRY" that Dr. Roger K. Leir removed an implant that was found to be BROADCASTING ON TWO (2) FM FREQUENCIES. Dr. Leir stated that no patient who has ever had an object removed has reported being troubled further, or has experienced reimplantation. Go to: www.Unknowncountry.com
WHO HOLDS THE CLICKER?, by Lauren Slater, MOTHER JONES, November 2005,
offers excellent background into implant use in the United States, that starts with Robert Heath's deep brain simulation at Tulane University School of Medicine and moves you through the U.S. Government's funding of Dr. Louis Jolyon West of UCLA who implanted prisoners in California prisons. Today, Medtronic, a Minneapolis-based company uses implants to control Parkinson's patients.DOWNLOAD "WHO HOLDS THE CLICKER?" HERE IN PDF.
MIND OVER MACHINE, by Carl Zimmer, "Some monkey business in a Duke University lab suggests we'll soon be able to move artificial limbs, control robotic soldiers, and communicate across thousands of miles - using nothing but out thoughts." This article appeared in the February 2004, POPULAR SCIENCE magazine. Of interest is the fact, BRAZILIAN MIGUEL NICOLELIS set up a lab at Duke University to implant electrodes into monkey brains instead of rats, hoping to get them to operate more complex equipment with their brains. "Miguel always wants more channels, says biomedical engineer Patrick Wolf with a grin." Popular Science Magazine offers more human-machine interface research at: www.popsci.com/exclusive YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD "MIND OVER MACHINE," BY CARL ZIMMER HERE IN PDF.
May 12, 2004, article by Kevin Maney, in USA TODAY, "GET CHIPPED, THEN CHARGE WITHOUT PLASTIC - YOU ARE THE CARD, states that CYBERKINETICS of Foxborough, Mass., manufactures an implant placed in a person's brain that will control a computer just by thinking. Cyberkinetics received approval from the U.S. Government in April 2004, to implant the chip in five paralyzed people for testing. The May 12, 2004 article and a copy of CYBERKINETICS INC. homepage www.cyberkineticsinc.com dated June 04, 2004 is being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD KEVIN MANEY ARTICLE AND CYBERKINETICS INFORMATION HERE IN PDF.
May 2004, article by Jesse Freund, in Wired Magazine, page 34, "BIONIC EARS." The article offers information on implants used for human-machine interface by the House Ear Institute in Los Angeles, California. The auditory brain stem implant is a gadget that connects an external microphone to eight microscopically thin electrodes jacked directly into nerve tissue. Bob Shannon, a biomedical engineer at the institute stated, "Microelectrodes will be used in the retina for visual stimulation, in the spinal cord for pain control, and to help alleviate paralysis in quadriplegics." The article is being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD JESSE FREUND ARTICLE "BIONIC EARS" HERE IN PDF.
October 3. 2009 letter to NICHOLAS THOMPSON, Senior Editor of WIRED MAGAZINE, as to his article entitled "THE DOOMSDAY MACHINE", Wired, Page 82, October 2009. Lambros requests that Mr. Thompson contact former Soviet Colonel VALERY YARYNICH, as to MIND CONTROL SENSORS PLACED WITHIN HUMANS TO MONITOR FOR NUCLEAR TESTS OR EXPLOSIONS THE WORLD OVER, when he was employed as a 30-year veteran of the Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces and Soviet General Staff, helping to build the "PERIMETER SYSTEM" a.k.a. "MERTVAYA RUKA!", or DEAD HAND. Lambros' letter is two (2) pages and the article is five (5) pages. Total of 7 pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 3, 2009 LETTER TO NICHOLAS THOMPSON HERE IN PDF FORMAT.
THE BOYCOTT AGAINST THE PURCHASE AND IMPORTATION OF BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
IS "MAD COW DISEASE" IN BRAZILIAN CATTLE, SHEEP, DEER, ELK, GOATS, AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS, SUCH AS DAIRY PRODUCTS??? YOU BE THE JUDGE, AFTER READING THE FOLLOWING!!! AS OF JUNE, 2001 BOTH THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA HAVE BANNED THE IMPORT OF BRAZILIAN BEEF AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS.
FACT SHEET FOR "MAD COW DISEASE:" (June, 2001)
1. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) - is commonly called MAD COW DISEASE.
2. BSE was first discovered in Britain in 1986.
3.In the past two years, wider screening of cattle have detected BSE in France, Germany, Ireland and other nations.
4. Mad cow and the human form of the disease are always fatal.
5. More than 100 people, mostly in Britain, have died of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).
6. BSE could cripple the $175 billion United States beef industry and disrupt trade balance.
7. Creutzfeldt-Jakob is believed to come from eating tainted beef.
8. With an incubation period that could exceed 40 years in humans, nobody knows how many other people could develop the disease. Once symptoms appear, death follows, usually within months.
9. BSE has led to millions of cattle being destroyed globally.
10. BSE will eat away in human brain tissue and leave sponge-like holes.
11. Testing for BSE in animals examine tissue for PRIONS. Prion-diagnosing tests are used after symptoms appear during late stages of the disease in humans, whose tonsils are tested, or on brain and spinal tissue tissue taken from dead animals.
12. No one has yet developed a blood test that can detect the presence of the disease in its early stages.
13. European countries test all slaughtered cows older than 30 months before they enter the food chain.
14. Prion diseases are transmissible between species and bring about slow degeneration of the central nervous system, which inevitably leads to death. A long period elapses between infection and the appearance of the first clinical symptoms. Typically, it is two to four years in sheep, three to six years in cattle and more than 10 years in humans. Once the symptoms appear, death follows within months. Source: University of Zurich and Prionics AG, Switzerland, May 2001.
15. Canada has banned the import of beef and associated products from Brazil.
16. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service restricts the import of cattle from BSE-infected areas. As an extra precaution, the USDA RECENTLY SUSPENDED THE IMPORT OF BEEF AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS FROM BRAZIL.
17. There are a number a number of web sites posting current, factual data about BSE. You can log on to:
a. USDA's home page at: www.usda.govb. The National Cattlemens Beef Association home page at: www.bseinfo.org
C. The Food and Drug Administrations web site at: www.fda.gov
18. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is attempting to help people understand the BRAZILIAN - "MAD COW" issue. It is essential that all countries suspend the import of BEEF AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS FROM BRAZIL so the Brazilian Government may prove what is fact and what is fiction.
19. DAIRY INDUSTRY: milk, cheese, ice cream, butter, cream, buttermilk, yogurt, chocolate milk, fruit flavored dairy drinks, whipping cream, half-and-half, sour cream.
BY-PRODUCTS OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY: Some by-products of dairy have industrial uses. Lactose, or milk sugar is used in the fermentation process that produces PENICILLIN. Lactose is also a base for pills and used in INFANT FOODS.
BRAZILIAN CORNED BEEF RECALLED OVER INGREDIENTS. The following article by the Associated Press appeared in the Sunday, December 30, 2001, STAR TRIBUNE newspaper. Please e-mail the Agriculture Department in your country and advise them of the recall.
HOW MANY BRAZILIANS HAVE DIED FROM "MAD COW DISEASE"??? As of September 23, 2005, about 150 Britons have died from "MAD COW DISEASE." See, THE WEEK, September 2005, Page 26.
IS BRAZIL "DUMPING" MANUFACTURED GOODS IN UNITED STATES AT LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THOSE GOODS IN BRAZIL? MINNESOTA GOVERNOR JESSE VENTURA THINKS SO!!!!!
1. On March 15, 2001, Minnesota Governor JESSE VENTURA signed Minnesota House File 219 and Senate File 258, the resolution to immediately impose a one-year ban on imports of all steel products from Brazil and other countries. Officials state illegal imports of steel products from BRAZIL and other countries have been the cause of more than 7,000 job losses for steelworkers across the nation in the last six months, including 1,500 jobs in Minnesota. BOYCOTT BRAZIL again thanks Minnesota Governor JESSE VENTURA for his continued support. If you would like a copy of the Bill Titled, "Resolution requesting a ban on the importation of certain steel products, go to the Minnesota Legislature's web page and download a copy and e-mail it to your government officials so they may consider same. Visit the Minnesota Legislature's web page at: www.leg.state.mn.us
2. "DUMPING" is the sale of foreign manufactured goods in United States at less than fair market value of those goods in country of manufacture. See, TARIFF ACT OF 1930, § 731 et seq., as amended, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1673 et seq. and ZENITH ELECTRONICS CORP. vs. U.S., 988 F.2d 1573 (Fed.Cir. 1993) This case offers an excellent overview on "DUMPING." Also, 755 F-Supp. 397(CIT 1990).
3. Department of Commerce applies reasonable interpretation of Antidumping Act when it construes "principal markets" as ALL MARKETS in country of export in which exporter usually sells merchandise. TARIFF ACT OF 1930, § 773(a)(1)(A), as amended, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1677b(a)(1)(A).
4. THE FOLLOWING COMPANIES DISTRIBUTE BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES:a. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION, Austin, Minnesota 55912, Telephone number for questions or comments, please call 1-800-523-4635. Hormel distributes CORNED BEEF that is packed under Brazilian Government Inspection numbers, C.N.P.J. 01.597.168/0013-22, EST. 337.b. June 2, 2001, letter from LAMBROS to HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION regarding why Hormel Foods is selling "CORNED BEEF" in the can that is produced in BRAZIL when CANADA has BANNED ALL BRAZILIAN BEEF IN THE CAN due to FOOT-AND- MOUTH DISEASE in Brazil. This letter is two (2) pages in length and includes three (3) exhibits. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER NAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD THE JUNE 2, 2001 LETTER TO HORMEL FOODS IN PDF HERE.
c. SAMPCO INC., President David Morrison, President, Suite 3700, 221 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60601. As of April 2002 Sampco Inc. was importing 150 - 40 foot containers of Brazilian meat per month from Bertin Ltd., a meatpacker in the heart of Brazil's cattle country. Attached for your review is Lambros' April 10, 2002 and June 1, 2002 letters in PDF FORMAT to David Morrison, President of Sampco Inc. as to Lambros' torture and boycott of Brazilian products. Mr. Morrison HAS NOT responded to Lambros as of July 20, 2002. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD SAMPCO INC. CORRESPONDENCE HERE IN PDF.
d. CARGILL INC., the Minnesota based multinational has more than 120 plants, warehouses, port terminals and farms in Brazil. It counts more than 90 buying stations and employs more than 5,000 people. Cargill is currently assisting in financing the paving of roads from Cuiaba, a city within MATO GROSSO, Brazil to the Amazon River port SANTAREM to ship SOYBEANS. The distance is equivalent to trucking soybeans from Minneapolis to New Orleans. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, METRO EDITION. Cargill opened a new export terminal in April 2003 in SANTAREM, Brazil to export soybeans. Brazil is expected to convert 50 million acres to crops by 2014. That's an area the size of Minnesota, and most will be new soybeans. STAR TRIBUNE newspaper.
e. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND, Illinois-based is also a major player in farming, warehousing and financing the paving of roads from Cuiaba, Brazil to the Amazon River port SANTAREM to ship SOYBEANS. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE article.
f. BUNGE, New York-based, is a major player in farming, warehousing and financing the paving of roads from Cuiaba, Brazil to the Amazon River port SANTAREM to ship SOYBEANS. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE article.
g. JOHN DEERE. John Deere tractors can be found all over Brazil. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE article.
DOWNLOAD MARCH 7, 2004, ARTICLE "THE NEW BREADBASKET" HERE IN PDF.
h. CUTRALE GROUP: Brazil's secretive "ORANGE KING", is owned by 68 year old Jose Luis Cutrale (coo-TRAH-lee), one of Brazil's wealthiest men. The family owned orange juice giant owns a juicing operation in Portugal and is ONE OF THE BIGGEST PLAYERS IN FLORIDA. In fact, CUTRALE has faced dozens of violations of workplace safety regulations in the U.S., since buying two (2) former Minute Maid juice plants in Florida in 1997. The company has been cited for 42 "SERIOUS" violations at factories and seven repeat violations by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, paying out $122,765 in settlements. Brazilian labor prosecutors say they have opened 286 investigations into Cutrale's labor practices since 1997, resulting in dozens of lawsuits. Prosecutors have investigated the company for a variety of potential violations, including using SLAVE LABOR AND SHELTERING PICKERS IN INHUMANE CONDITIONS. In JULY 2014, about 30 migrant orange pickers from northern Brazil accused CUTRALE of making them work 12-hour days, HOUSING UP TO 17 PEOPLE IN ONE ROOM, INDEBTING THEM TO A COMPANY STORE AND THEN FIRING THEM WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION. The company didn't acknowledge wrongdoing but agreed to pay rent, debts to the store and transportation costs. CUTRALE is one of three (3) companies operating in Brazil THAT ACCOUNT FOR ABOUT 80% OF GLOBAL ORANGE-JUICE EXPORTS. . CUTRALE exported $1.7 billion from Brazil in 2013. CUTRALE is Brazil's number 2 producer of orange-juice, behind Brazil-based CITROSUCO and ahead of French trading conglomerate LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES. See, Wall Street Journal, August 15, 2014, "ORANGE KING'S NEWEST DESIRE: BANANAS", by Paul Kiernan and Rogerio Jelmayer.
i. JBS SA: JBS SA is a Brazilian meat processor who is owned by a pair of Brazilian brothers who aim to dominate the global meat business - Wesley and Joesley Batista. Wesley is the CE0 and runs the meat packing operation and Joesley is president of JBS's board in charge of finance. JBS has a market value of $9.9 billion in 2013. JBS has acquired the following companies: Swift (beef & port in 2007); Inaica (beef in 2007)(50% stake); Smithfield Beef (2008); Pilgrim's Pride (chicken 2009)(64% stake); Bertin (beef 2009); and Seara Brasil (chicken and pork 2013). Sounds like a way to put American farmers out of business. See, Wall Street Journal, June 4, 2014, "FOR BRAZILIAN BEEF DUO, A SWIFT RISE", by Jacob Bunge and David Kesmodel.
PRICE--COMPARIS0N SEARCH ENGINE AND LEGITIMATE ESCROW SERVICE ALLOWS YOU VALID OPTIONS SO YOU MAY BOYCOTT AGAINST THE PURCHASE AND IMPORTATION OF BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
froogle.google.com --Google's new price-comparison engine (2003), Froogle, will peek into the remote corners of the world and web for the best prices on the products you now purchase from Brazil. Search for any imaginable item that Brazil currently exports and beat the price. Hone your hunt using the Advanced Search page, where you can limit hits to products within a certain price range or in a particular category - tremendously helpful in zooming in on your dream deal.
www.escrow.com --Boycott Brazil recommends using escrow.com, which was the first online escrow business certified under California's escrow laws, the United States most stringent, to protect all selling and buying of products on the internet.
www.transrow.com --In addition to relying on a legitimate escrow service, you might try a service like Transrow, which helps sellers (mostly for high-end transactions) verify bidders by requiring them to deposit funds or submit a driver's license and credit reference.
www.sos4auctions.com --This site offers clues for spotting scam escrow web sites as more than a hundred have popped up in 2002.
www.bbbonline.org --The Better Business Bureau is another excellent place to visit to check a credit reference.
BOYCOTT BRAZIL WILL STOP CHILD SLAVERY ON BRAZILIAN COCOA FARMS
On October 1, 2001, Sumana Chatterjee, published the article "COCOA INDUSTRY TO FIGHT SLAVERY." The article offers an excellent overview on cocoa farmers enslaving children in the Ivory Coast, a West African nation that supplies 43 percent of U.S. cocoa, the raw ingredient of chocolate. BRAZIL is the second largest supplier of Cocoa in the world. Boycott Brazil is requesting your assistance in contacting your local grocery store and the World Cocoa Foundation in boycotting BRAZILIAN COCOA due to child slavery and other forms of exploitation by Brazilian cocoa farmers. This article is two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD "COCOA INDUSTRY TO FIGHT SLAVERY" ARTICLE IN PDF.
BRAZIL'S SHOE INDUSTRY "CHILD LABOR" AND "HIGH IMPORT DUTIES"
1. May 15, 1995, the Wall Street Journal reported that Brazil raised import duties on shoes to as much as 63% from 20% and offered incentives to encourage investment to modernize shoe production. WHY SHOULDN'T U.S. DOMESTIC SHOEMAKERS BE GIVEN INCENTIVES AND FAVORABLE CONSIDERATIONS IN SELLING SHOES? On September 5, 1995, Lambros wrote Dr. Kathy M. Hawk, Director of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, requesting a boycott of all Brazilian shoes and boots from U.S. Prisons to protect United States shoe makers and support Lambros' boycott of Brazilian goods.2. In 1994, the United States Department of State "HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT FOR BRAZIL" stated "Independent shoe manufactures in Franca (Sao Paulo state) [Brazil] continue to employ thousands of children under age 14, in violation of the law." The report also states illegally employed children and adolescents from 7 to 17 years of age are used by sugar cane growers, orange growers, and mining and logging industries. This page from report, letter to Hawk, and the Wall Street Journal article are three (3) pages in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.
DOWNLOAD 1994 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT FOR BRAZIL HERE IN PDF.
JURUA REGION OF BRAZIL
Greenpeace recalled about 500 promotional mousepads because the WATER that was used to produce their rubber surfaces was found to harbor harmful FUNGAL SPORES. The WATER came from the Jurua region of Brazil. This was reported in the January 2001, YAHOO! INTERNET LIFE Magazine on page 42. BOYCOTT BRAZIL has issued a health alert as to all products from the Jurua region of Brazil.
BOLIVIA IS FREE OF INCOME AND CAPITAL GAINS TAXES
As of 1997, Bolivia offered the global investment community trusts and savings accounts FREE of income and capital gains taxes. Boycott Brazil is suggesting all investors in Brazil to research the favorable tax laws within Bolivia and consider your options.ASTROTURF SINISTER SEAWEED LIKELY TO INVADE WATERS IN BRAZIL - WITH NO BAN.
CAULERPA TAXIFOLIA, a beautiful but sinister seaweed has taken over the Mediterranean Sea in the last few years, choking corals, blanketing sandy bottoms and fouling fisherman's nets. Environmentalists fear that it couldinvade waters in BRAZIL, where it is presently confined to tanks in aquarium stores and fish collectors' homes. Once the CAULERPA TAXIFOLIA is in home aquariums, the weed could easily make it into the wild. Many aquarium owners dump the contents into local waterways, under the mistaken impression that they are "freeing" the plants and animals.
The seaweed in question has been compared to living Astroturf because of its carpet-like growth. The original Caulerpa lives in the Red Sea. But the form that is spreading was bred in European aquariums. It was released into the Mediterranean by the aquarium in Monaco and now covers tens of thousands of acres off the coasts of Italy and France.
Wherever Caulerpa grows, scientists say, nothing else does. It smothers all other sea life. Fisherman working in affected sites haul up nets full of Caulerpa and little more. Almost nothing can get rid of the weed. "They tried warm water, they tried copa (coconut fiber), they tried salt," says Alexandre Meinesz of the University of Nice. The Caulerpa always grows back. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against importing anything that is dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban of Caulerpa Taxifolia into Brazil.
MOLD OVERWHELMS BRAZIL - PROBLEMS GROW IN HOTELS, APARTMENTS, OFFICES, AND SHOPS
MOLD is causing confusion and fear in Brazil's commercial real-estate market, not to mention a significant health concern - from apartments to hotels to shopping centers.The fungal growth, found in damp or wet conditions, has been blamed for a number of health problems, including breathing difficulties, headaches, nausea, gastrointestinal ailments, skin rashes, severe allergic reactions and neurological damage. The United States incurred over $1.3 billion in home-owner's insurance claims in 2001 due to mold-related expense costs, says the Insurance Information Institute, a New York-based trade group. The problem being most severe in California and Texas.
In July 2002, the Hilton Hotels Corp. shut down one of six towers that comprise the Hilton Hawaiian Village in Waikiki after investigators discovered mold. As of December 2002, Hilton has taken charges totaling $20 million for cleanup. A spokesman says the 454 guest rooms in the 25-story tower would remain closed for at least six more months.
In August 2002, KDF North Hills, Orange County, California paid $900,000.00 to a mother and her three children after their mold-infested rental apartment made them sick.
BOYCOTT BRAZIL is requesting all buyers and rental tenants of property in Brazil to add MOLD INSPECTION as part of the industry's due-diligence process before taking on a transaction. Buyers/renters need to (1) watch for clues on property tours such as leaks, wet spots, condensation and stains or musty odors; (2) ask property managers, engineers and occupants about MOLD; (3) obtain copies of all existing indoor air quality and mold reports; (4) consider performing a MOLD survey if warning signs exist; and (5) review property and casualty insurance, watch for mold and environmental exclusions.
--BUGLER NEWS SERVICE quoting www.brazilboycott.org
TAMARISK - SALT CEDAR TREE - SOAKS MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF WATER AND CROWDS OUT NATIVE PLANT LIFE IN BRAZIL
TAMARISK, also known as salt cedar has been spotted invading Brazil's springs, ditches and wetlands. The bushy tree sucks up hundreds of billions of gallons of water a year and crowds out native plants along rivers. It can grow up to a foot a month, to a height of 30 feet. The leaves secrete salt, making nothing else grow on the ground below. Mature trees produce up to 500,000 seeds a year and spread easily, sprouting wherever the soil is moist. BOYCOTT BRAZIL recommends any person purchasing land in Brazil to investigate for TAMARISK before purchasing. As usual, the Brazilian government is NOT supporting the removal of TAMARISK with federal funding before the risk spreads to any place the plant can tap into the water supply.
-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE, quoting www.brazilboycott.orgBEDBUGS (Cimex lectularius) SUCK THE BLOOD OF SLEEPING BRAZILIANS AND TOURISTS IN BRAZIL
BEDBUGS (Cimex lectularius) about the size of a ladybug, 1/5 inch long as adults, have been keeping exterminator's busy in Brazil, as bedbug populations are surging due to Brazilian travelers within Brazil who bring the bloodsucking pests into hotels and their homes in luggage. Hotels and apartment buildings seem to bear the brunt of the bedbug problem, according to pest-control companies in Brazil, as bedbugs like to stay close to its preferred prey: sleeping Brazilian's. Eradicating bedbugs are notoriously difficult, often requiring hotel owners to throw out mattresses. Brazilian's are known to be cheap, thus throwing out a mattress may not occur. BOYCOTT BRAZIL recommends all travelers to Brazil to check hotel rooms for bedbugs before going to sleep.-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE, quoting www.brazilboycott.org
KUDZU - INVADING BRAZIL AT A FOOT A DAY
KUDZU, a green leafy vine native to China and Japan has increased damage to timber producers and crops throughout Brazil. The Brazilian government refuses to import Bean Plataspids, another Asian import, that munches on the fast-growing kudzu. Kudzu vines can grow up to a foot a day. Boycott Brazil has received reports from supporters that it is common for kudzu vines to form a thick mat as they grow and change the natural habitat, as it climbs over trees, utility poles and anything else in its path in Brazil.-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE (2011).
PIGWEED - INVADING BRAZIL
Palmer amaranth, or pigweed an invasive plant that allows farmers in Brazil to douse fields with propazine which poses potential risks to human health. Studies indicate propazine can interrupt sexual reproduction in humans. Pigweed can grow up to 3 inches a day and one pigweed plant can produce thousands of seeds.
Brazil needs to outlaw the use of propazine. The controversial herbicide is being exported within foods and posing risks to citizens around the world.-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE (2015).
RED-TIDE POSSIBLY LINGERING ALONG BRAZIL'S 4,500 MILE ATLANTIC COASTLINE.
April 11, 2005, Boycott Brazil was informed that a toxic algae bloom has been lingering along areas of Brazil's 4,500-mile (7,200-kilometer) Atlantic coastline that is rimmed with sandy beaches and narrow but fertile coastal plains interspersed with low hills. RED-TIDE, frequently reddish-brown, is the colloquial name for several types of microscopic algae that sometimes bloom near coasts. Some believe the first of the ten (10) plagues of Egypt described in the Bible was a red tide: "... and all the waters that were in the river turned to blood. And the fish that were in the river died, and the water stank." The algae, called KARENIA BREVIS, produces a poison called a brevetoxin. Though not deadly, it can cause neurotoxic shellfish poisoning in people who eat contaminated fish and asthma-like symptoms in those who breath in the oderless toxic particles that can BLOW OFF THE WAVES UP TO ONE (1) MILE INLAND. Once a year, the KARENIA BREVIS population undergoes an explosion for reasons scientists can't explain. The number of the creatures can go from 1,000 in a liter of ocean water to more than 1 million. WHY DOESN'T BRAZIL'S GOVERNMENT GIVE WARNINGS TO BRAZILIMS AND TOURISTS WHEN THEY VISIT THE BEACH WHEN A RED TIDE IS PRESENT? Florida offers red-tide updates for beaches at www.floridamarine.org.4,500 BRAZILIAN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS DEPORTED BY THE UNITED STATES IN 2004 BY PLANE - MOST NOT INFORMED OF RIGHT TO CONTACT BRAZILIAN CONSULATE. See, USA TODAY, "ILLEGALS GOING BACK BY THE PLANELOAD," February 17, 2005.
Brazilian illegal immigrants that have been deported from the United States to Brazil in 2004 have complained that the VIENNA CONVENTION was violated when the arresting authorities in the U.S. failed to inform them, as a foreign national, they had a right to contact the Brazilian Consulate. See, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Vienna Convention), April 24, 1963, [1970] 21 U.S.T. 77, T.I.A.S. No. 6820. Also see, BREARD vs. GREENE, 140 L.Ed.2d 529 (1998)
If you are a Brazilian criminal in the USA illegally or an illegal Brazilian immigrant who has committed no crimes other than violations of visa limits and other immigration laws in the USA, you must contact the Brazilian Consulate in the USA so the Consul may advise you as to your legal rights. The arresting authority will also appoint you an attorney at no cost if you do not have money. Therefore, you are receiving legal assistance from both the Brazilian Consul and an attorney.
IMPORTANT: If you don't assert your right under the Vienna Convention to have the arresting authority contact the Brazilian Consulate to provide you with FREE LEGAL ADVICE, you default on any claims. Boycott Brazil believes Brazilian's and the legal authority that arrests them in the USA have an excellent claim in bringing suit against Brazil if the Brazilian Consulate REFUSES to visit the jailed Brazilian, alleging a denial of rights under the Vienna Convention.BRAZILIAN FLEEING TO U.S.A. DUE TO MASS MILITARY "BRAIN CONTROL IMPLANT PROGRAM." On May 10, 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported that the number of Brazilians attempting to use Mexico as a springboard to enter the U.S. is skyrocketing. "In the past seven months, the U.S. Border Patrol has caught more than 15,000 UNDOCUMENTED BRAZILIANS, compared with fewer than 10,000 in each of the previous two years. Last month, nearly 150 Brazilian migrants were seized on a single day near McAllen, Texas." The article reported that over 25,000 illegal undocumented Brazilians will attempt to enter the U.S.A. along the U.S.Mexico border in 2005. See, "MEXICO FOCUSES ON BRAZILIANS AMID U.S. MIGRANT CONCERNS," by Joel Millman with contributions by Geraldo Samor in Rio de Janiero and Robert Block in Washington.
SNAKEHEAD FISH LIKELY TO INVADE AMAZON RIVER IN BRAZIL - WITH NO BAN.
Boycott Brazil has been informed by sources in Brazil that anglers caught one of twenty-eight species of snakehead in the waters of the Amazon River that flows into the Atlantic Ocean. The Amazon River flows a thousand miles upstream from Manaus, Brazil into the Atlantic Ocean. The snakehead is a non-native hardy fish native to China that can travel on land and eat so much that it can destroy an ecosystem. In 2002, the United States Department of the Interior banned the import of 28 species of snakehead fish. Brazil's largest lakes, Mirim (Brazil-Uruguay), Patos (actually lagoons), and major rivers, Amazon, Madeira, Negro, Para, Parana, Sao Francisco, are in danger of the invasive snakehead fish. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against importing anything that is dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban of snakehead fish into Brazil.COMMERCIAL SHIPPING DUMPING INVASIVE SPECIES INTO AMAZON RIVER IN BRAZIL
June 2004, Boycott Brazil has just received a report that oceangoing vessels have been dumping invasive species of fish into the Amazon River through ballast tanks that may contain 2 million gallons of water, as the vessel takes on grain or other cargo. The invaders include Sea Lamprey (Atlantic Ocean); Round Goby (Black and Caspian seas); Quagga Mussels (Black and Caspian seas); Spiny Water Flea (Northern Europe and Russia); Zebra Mussels (Western Russia near Caspian Sea and Europe). BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against anything dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban on the above listed invasive species into Brazil.
RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL SAND IS A PETRI DISH OF BACTERIA - BACTERIA MAY LINGER WITHIN ALL THE SAND OF BRAZIL'S 4,500 MILE ATLANTIC COASTLINE.
DECEMBER 3, 2015: The water around Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. is worse than the world thought, as it prepares for the 2016 Summer Olympics. USA TODAY warns sailors, rowers, canoeists and open-water swimmers to beware of the existing viruses and bacteria, as the water in Rio is more contaminated by sewage than previously known. Again, Brazilians do not keep the promise and pledge to clean up its water-ways by improving sanitation for the Olympics. See, December 3, 2015, USA TODAY, article "BROKEN PROMISES, Like Other Olympic hosts, Rio Fails to deliver on vows," by Christine Brennan.
Contaminated water closes beaches but it is the sand that typically harbors the bacteria within Rio de Janeiro's beach sand. Because microbes can survive longer in Rio's sand, they could pose more health risk than water-borne bacteria. Studies within the U.S. have usually shown sand has levels of bacteria five to 10 times higher than water, says Clean Beaches Council president Walter McLeod. In 2003, studies found bacteria levels in sand at freshwater beaches in Chicago averaged up to 10 times that of swimming water and the sand had to be replaced. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is alerting all parents of children who use the beaches in Rio de Janeiro to tell kids to keep hands out of their mouths while digging in the sand and that everyone wash hands thoroughly after a day at the shore.PHOSPHORUS SHOULD BE BANNED IN BRAZIL.
Boycott Brazil is requesting Brazil to ban phosphorus from fertilizers used on residential lawns, to protect Brazilian lakes and rivers from an over-abundance of phosphorus that can cause ALGAE BLOOM, effectively choking other aquatic plants and depleting oxygen supply. One (1) pound of phosphorus can grow five-hundred (500) pounds of algae and costs approximately $350 to remove one (1) pound of algae from a lake in the United States. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against anything dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban on phosphorus.
1. January 15, 2004, American Airline pilot DALE HIRSH, age 52, was arrested for allegedly making an obscene gesture during immigration formalities at Sao Paulo's Guarulhos International Airport. Brazilian police imposed a $12,750 FINE. Sounds like another Brazilian rip-off to Boycott Brazil supporters.2. February 8, 2004, DOUGLAS SKOLNICK of New Jersey is the second American to pay a fine for allegedly making an obscene gesture during fingerprinting and photographing process during entry into the Brazilian town of Foz do Iguacu with his tour group. SKOLNICK, 55, was allowed to pay $17,200 FINE. Again, this sounds like another Brazilian rip-off.
DOWNLOAD ARTICLES ON DALE HIRSH AND DOUGLAS SKOLNICK HERE IN PDF.
1. "CRAZY ANTS", also known as Nylanderia fulva, because of their unpredictable movements and swarming populations, are reddish-brown, measure about one-eighth of an inch long and have a hankering for honeydew melon. The CRAZY ANTS have been entering the United States via cargo containers from Brazil and have mostly infested Texas, Florida, Mississippi and Louisiana. Cost to protect one acre of land from the CRAZY ANTS is about $$2,300 per year. Thus land decreases in value if not treated. In Brazil, the ants are killing off all other ant species and killing small animals by asphyxiation. They have attacked the eyes, noses and hooves of larger animals, such as cattle, and dried out entire grasslands. BOYCOTT BRAZIL believes the best policy is to inform U.S. citizens o-.1' the "CRAZY ANTS" from Brazil and ask them to boycott all products from Brazil. This entry is dated: September 4, 2013.
1. The Wall Street Journal reported on July 13-14, 2013, that "Police in Sao Paulo state killed one suspect for every 229 they arrested last year, according to government figures, compared with one per 31,575 in the USA in 2011." "The phenomenon is hardly confined to Sao Paulo. In fact, Sao Paulo police are among Brazil's least lethal. Despite experiments with community policing, Rio de Janeiro police kill suspects at nearly four (4) times the rate of Sao Paulo police, Rio de Janeiro police statistics show. The symbol of Rio's tactical police is a skull with two pistols and a knife crossed through it." BOYCOTT BRAZIL does not recommend travel to Brazil.
Brazilian MARCELO TENORIO received ASYLUM in the United States based on sexual orientation in July 1993 from an immigration judge in San Francisco. TENORIO had been hunted down by antigay commando groups in Brazil. This case was funded by the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, a gay-rights group, in an effort to ease federal asylum rules for gays.
On November 21, 1995 letter from Vietnam Veterans of America to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation
On November 21, 1995 letter from Vietnam Veterans of America to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation
January 8, 1996 letter from Lambros to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation, and to the editor of Coffee Intelligence, a trade magazine
February 1, 1996 letter from Lambros to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation, and to the editor of Coffee Intelligence, a trade magazine
April 19th, 1996 letter from Lambros to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation
January 8, 1996 letter from Lambros to the Editor of Coffee Intelligence, a trade magazine, and to Edwin L Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation
February 1, 1996 letter from Lambros to the Editor of Coffee Intelligence, a trade magazine, and to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble CorporationJuly 12, 1996 letter from Lambros to President of Starbucks Coffee regarding the boycott of Brazilian products and services due to the torture of John Gregory Lambros.
September 12, 1996 reply letter from VP at Starbucks to Lambros regarding the boycott of Brazilian products.
GREEN BEANS FAIR TRADE COFFEE CAMPAIGN. You can have your cup and enjoy it guilt-free by buying NON-BRAZILIAN shade-grown coffee from small, independent growers and certified retailers. Visit this site to locate fair-trade vendors, or get involved in grass-roots activism. Be sure to let everyone you visit know that you support the boycott of Brazilian COFFEE. Proctor and Gamble Corporation buys Brazilian coffee to be placed within FOLGERS COFFEE.
Web site: www.globalexchange.org/economy/coffeeTHE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS, New Orleans, Louisiana, completed in 1993, the world's largest bulk coffee processing plant. A custom-designed computer system cleans, weighs, sorts and blends BRAZILIAN COFFEE before it is shipped off to roasters. The facility is located on "COFFEE CIRCLE" within THE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS. The name of the facility is "SILOCAF."
December 2, 2003, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) announced an initiative to assist 25 million families that grow coffee in 50 DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. CRS will sell fair-trade coffee among the 65 million Catholics in the United States. The program includes organizations from the Lutheran, Presbyterian and Methodist communities. It encourages the 19,000 Catholic parishes in the USA to endorse and sell fair-trade coffee. Reported on December 2, 2003, USA TODAY, Page 7D, by In-Sung Yoo.
DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 2, 2003, FAIR TRADE COFFEE ARTICLE HERE IN PDF.
July 20, 1996 memo from Vietnam Veterans of America, Chapter 75 to all Internet Surfers asking for help building pressure on Brazil with respect to the torture of John Gregory Lambros.
July 20, 1996 memo from Vietnam Veterans of America, Chapter 75 to all editors and publishers about the threat of electronic mind control.
RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL ATTORNEY CARLOS ROBERTO SCHLESINGER AND ATTORNEY NELIO ROBERTO SEIDL MACHADO. BOTH ATTORNEYS REPRESENTED JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS DURING HIS EXTRADITION TO THE UNITED STATES FROM RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL IN 1991 AND 1992.
DOWNLOAD 1991 LETTER BY BRAZILIAN ATTORNEY CARLOS ROBERTO SCHLESINGER HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD AUGUST 28, 1991, MOTION TO BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CARLOS VELLOSO HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD MARCH 6, 1992, MOTION BY NELIO ROBERTO SEIDL MACHADO TO BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT HERE IN PDF.
DOWNLOAD MAY 17, 1993, FAX FROM ATTORNEY ORREN TO ATTORNEY SCHLESINGER HERE IN PDF.
1. May 29, 1991, letter from John A. Lowell, Consul for the United States of America Embassy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to John G. Lambros, as to his visit on May 24, 1991 with Lambros. PLEASE NOTE THAT LOWELL HAD GUARANTEED LAMBROS HE WOULD RECEIVE A "HEARING" IN RIO de JANEIRO. The hearing never occurred and Lambros was taken to Brasilia, Brazil and tortured. Also attached is my October 16, 2000 letter to Attorney Stenmoe requesting that he forward John A. Lowell's May 29, 1991 letter to the court.
2. June 19, 1996, letter and addendum to U.S. Assistant Attorney Douglas Ray Peterson, St. Paul, Minnesota, requesting a MATERIAL WITNESS WARRANT FOR THE ARREST OF MARGARET MURPHY, U.S. CONSEL GENERAL FOR THE AMERICAN EMBASSY IN BRASILIA, BRAZIL. On January 11, 1993, the American Embassy in Brasilia, Brazil received a SUBPOENA for Margaret Murphy, Counsel General, American Embassy Brasilia, to appear on January 14, 1993, in the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, Courtroom three (3) at 9:00 a.m. MARGARET MURPHY DID NOT APPEAR NOR FORWARD "ANY AND ALL RECORDS RELATING TO JOHN LAMBROS." The subpoena was issued by U.S. Federal Judge Diana E. Murphy. Copy of the January 11, 1993 SUBPOENA is attached as an exhibit. WHY WASN'T LAMBROS' TRIAL STOPPED UNTIL THE U.S. MARSHALS COULD SECURE AND TRANSPORT MARGARET MURPHY TO LAMBROS' TRIAL???? This eight page document has been copied so two pages appear on one page, thus a TOTAL OF FIVE (5) PAGES IN PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.
DOWNLOAD JUNE 19, 1996 LETTER AND SUBPOENA FOR MARGARET MURPHY HERE IN PDF.
1. In January 1973s Francisco Toscanino was lured and kidnapped from his home in Montevideo, Uruguay and turned over Brazilians who brought him to to Brasilia, Brazil where he was tortured and interrogated while the U.S. Government and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York received reports. Furthermore, during his period of torture and interrogation a member of the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs was present at one or more intervals and actually participated in portions of the interrogation. Toscanino's captors denied him sleep for days at a time. Nourishment was provided intravenously in a manner precisely equal to an amount necessary to keep him alive. Toscanino was forced to walk up and down a hallway for seven or eight hours at a time. When he could no longer stand he was kicked and beaten but all in a manner contrived to punish without scarring. When he would not answer, his fingers were pinched with metal pliers. Alcohol was flushed into his eye and nose and other fluids .... were forced up his anal passage. Incredibly, these agents of the United States government attached electrodes to Toscanino's earlobes, toes, and genitals. Jarring jolts of electricity were shot throughout his body, rendering him unconscious for indeterminate periods of time but again leaving no physical scars. Finally on January 25, 1973 Toscanino was brought to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil drugged by Brazilian-America agents and placed on a flight to New York and delivered to Thomas Puccio, Assistant U.S. Attorney to be arrested on a indictment returned by a grand jury on February 22, 1973. See, U.S. vs. FRANCISCO TOSCANINO, 500 F.2d 267, 269-270 (2nd. Cir. 1974).
2. On October 20, 1991, the Sunday newspaper article from CAMPINAS, [Sao Paulo, Brazil] entitled "MAFIOSO DA CAMORRA PRESO SOFREU TORTURAS NA DITADURA" by Jose Francisco Pacola, states FRANCISCO TOSCANINO is currently being held at the Federal Police Station in Brasilia, Brazil awaiting his extradition to Italy. The article appears below without the picture of Francisco Toscanino due to poor image quality.
The above October 20, 1991, article was mailed to Lambros by the son
of FRANCISCO TOSCANIN0 - MAXIME TOSCANIN0 - on February 12, 1996, thru
Attorney Jeff Orren.
Maxime stated that his father Francisco Toscanino was in a maximum
security prison near Naples, Italy and offered the name of Francisco
Toscanino's lawyer DURING HIS EXTRADITION TO ITALY - DR. JULIO CARDELLA, RUA GENERAL OSORIO, 939, CAMPINAS SAO PAULO, BRAZIL AND PHONE NUMBER.
DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 12, 1996, LETTER FROM MAXIME TOSCANINO TO LAMBROS AND ORREN HERE IN PDF.
3. On September 8, 1995, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the U.S. District Court's record and findings of U.S. Judge Diana E. Murphy and stated, "Although a specific finding on the question whether Lambros had been tortured with American complicity would have been preferable, the state of the record obviates the need for remand. First, as discussed below, Lambros' testimony is UNRELIABLE because he PERJURED HIMSELF in other regards at trial, and it is also FANTASTIC. (For instance, Lambros maintains that he was held in the same Brazilian cell where the mistreatment alleged in United States vs. TOSCANINO, 500 F.2d 267 (2nd Cir. 1974), occurred, AND EVEN ASSERTS THAT HE MET TOSCANINO THERE.)" See, U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F.3d 698, 701 (8th Cir. 1995)
4. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS AND FRANCISCO TOSCANINO SPENT OVER FOUR (4) MONTHS TOGETHER AT THE FEDERAL POLICE STATION IN BRASILIA, BRAZIL IN 1991, INCLUDING OCTOBER 20, 1991. IN FACT, THE REPORTERS WHO INTERVIEWED TOSCANINO ALSO TOOK PICTURES OF LAMBROS IN 1991. THEREFORE, LAMBROS' TESTIMONY TO THE DISTRICT COURT, JUDGE DIANA E. MURPHY, WAS NOT UNRELIABLE OR FANTASTIC. The government of Brazil, United States Department of State, and the U.S. Department of Justice lied to the fact that I was jailed with Francisco Toscanino and my torture. U.S. Department of State General Counsel MARGARET MURPHY refused to obey Judge Murphys' SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY at Lambros' trial. General Counsel Margaret Murphy knew FRANCISCO TOSCANINO was being held with Lambros and visited Lambros several times at the Federal Police Station in Brasilia, Brazil as to Lambros' torture within the facility.
5. March 6, 1996, letter from Lambros to Senator Jesse Helms, Senator Rod Grams, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Senator Nancy Landon Kassebaum, Senator Paul Wellstone, Dr. Antony C. Sutton, Editor of the Phoenix Letter, Francesco TOSCANINO, and Attorney Julio Cardella, Campinas-Sao Paulo, Brazil (TOSCANINO'S ATTORNEY). Lambros' March 6, 1996 letter requests a "SENATE INQUIRY AS TO TORTURE OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS AND OFFERS PROOF THAT FRANCESCO TOSCANINO WAS BEING HELD IN THE SAME BRAZILIAN POLICE DETENTION STATION AS JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS." Senator Jesse Helms responded to Lambros on May 20, 1996 stating "I contacted the proper authorities of the Bureau of Prisons and in doing so, I have requested their careful attention and consideration of the situation." No other action was taken by Senator Jesse Helms. None of the other persons named responded except the TOSCANINO FAMILY. This document is six (6) pages in total with exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.
June 22, 1996 letter from Lambros to Chubb Insurance Companies relating his torture n Brazil and warning about the threat to persons, especially company executives, traveling and working in Brazil.
July 20, 1996 follow-up letter from Lambros to Chubb Insurance Companies transmitting more evidence and information about torture in Brazil.
June 22, 1996 letter from Lambros to an Analyst at Franklin Research & Development seeking assistance and information in organizing shareholder pressure on companies doing business in Brazil.
June 22, 1996 follow-up letter from Lambros to an Analyst at Franklin Research & Development transmitting additional information to Franklin regarding Lambros's activities.
BRAZIL'S CHIEF OF STATE AND CABINET MEMBERS. May 22, 2012 list of Brazil's chief of state and cabinet members as offered by the U.S. Government's CIA.Chiefs of State and Cabinet Members of Foreign Governments
As of May 22, 2012
COUNTRY STUDIES FROM THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. This is only a LINK to the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS COUNTRY STUDIES web site that contains reports on over 100 countries, including BRAZIL. To find what you need, browse the table of contents for BRAZIL, or search for a particular word or words in the entry for one country, BRAZIL, or a combination of countries. This database covers everything from history and business to government and NATIONAL SECURITY. (http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cshome.html)
BRAZILIAN COMPANIES THAT TRADE ON U.S. STOCK EXCHANGES (ADR'S)
November 2011 list of Brazilian publicly traded corporations that ALSO trade legally with the U.S. market. The following list may be updated by going to the BANK OF NEW YORK'S WEB SITE that offers a listing of every foreign company that trades in the U.S. and links to research reports, organizations and STOCK EXCHANGES AROUND THE WORLD: www.bankofny.com/adr/ J.P. Morgan & Co. also runs a web site that offers a variety of news, financial data and research tools on the following Brazilian companies, that will assist you in notifying everyone that does business with those companies as to the torture of John Gregory Lambros. www.adr.com
• Bombril-Cirio
• AmBev (ABV)
• Banco Bradesco (BBD)
• Banco Santander Brasil (BSBR)
• Brasil Telecom (BTM)
• Brasil Telecom Participacoes (BRP)
• Braskem (BAK)
• Brasil Foods (BRFS)
• Centrais Eletricas Brasileiras-Eletrobras (EBR)
• Comp. Paranaense de Energia (ELP)
• Companhia Brasileira de Distribuicao (CBD)
• Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais (CIG)
• Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (SID)
• CPFL Energia CPL
• Embraer (ERJ)
• Fibria Celulose (FBR)
• Gafisa (GFA)
• Gerdau (GGB)
• Gol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes (GOL)
• Itau Unibanco Holding (ITUB)
• Net Servicos de Comunicacao (NETC)
• Petroleo Brasileiro (PBR)
• Sadia (SDA)
• Tele Norte Leste (TNE)
• Telecomunicacoes de Sao Paulo (TSP)
• TIM Participacoes (TSU)
• Ultrapar (UGP)
• Vale (VALE)
• Vivo Participacoes (VIV)
CONTACT STOCK EXCHANGES GLOBALLY AS TO THE BOYCOTT OF
BRAZIL.
Please take a few minutes and help spread the word globally to
publicly traded companies and stock exchanges by researching these
sites. Most exchanges have home pages and most offer an
English-language version - though frequently you'll have to hunt for
the link, this is also true for non- English speaking foreign
companies:
a. Global Securities Information, a Washington, D.C., firm runs a site that provides links to just about every known stock exchange. Visit: www.gsionline.com/exchange.htm
b. IntlTrader.com provides links to non-U.S. Corporate web sites. The Winter Park, Florida online broker allows U.S. residents to trade in 32 foreign markets, and to do research on companies in many more. IntlTrader also supplies clients and GUESTS with access to research compiled by Wright Investors' Service, SUCH AS THE COMPANY AND ITS COMPETITORS - A USEFUL TOOL. Visit: IntlTrader.com
C. Globeshare.com, New York, provides country-specific data on company's, foreign-exchange rates and individual-company research published by a variety of foreign brokerage firms. (Some of this research is dated.) The information is available to clients and NON-CLIENTS who register at the site. Visit: Globeshare.com
d. Web sites for overseas brokers can be located at: www.globalinvestor.com
e. Local newspapers across the globe, many of which report, in English, on local companies and investment/boycott ideas, may be accessed from links from www.onlinenewspapers.com
f. If you need to locate the specific BRAZILIAN COMPANY you are BOYCOTTING and information on the city or town the Brazilian company is located within, visit MSN ENCARTA: GEOGRAPHY at encarta.msn.com/category/geography.asp or NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC: MAPS & GEOGRAPHY at www.nationalgeographic.com/maps
August 13, 1998 MEMORANDUM from LAMBROS to all supporters of BOYCOTT BRAZIL regarding SELECTIVE PURCHASING ORDINANCES.
BOYCOTT BRAZIL is requesting your assistance in contacting PURCHASING AGENTS,
state and municipalities, to adopt "SELECTIVE PURCHASING ORDINANCES."
Go to the Free Burma
Coalition website for more information.
MOTHER JONES
MAGAZINE
LOCAL MARIJUANA ACTIVISTS USE THREAT OF IMPEACHMENT TO EDUCATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS. Marijuana advocate Roger Christie lead local activists in Hawaii County (the State's Big Island) in the filing of impeachment petitions against Mayor Stephen Yamashiro and the council members over its support of Green Harvest, the $265,000.00 DEA drug enforcement grant to eradicate cultivated marijuana plants. The activists effectively overturned the council's earlier 5-4 vote approving the grant. Under the Hawaii County Charter, officials must pay their expenses to fight IMPEACHMENT PETITIONS. Worried about that prospect, before voting narrowly to receive the DEA grant, the council added language calling for some of the grant to be used to provide "IMPEACHMENT INSURANCE." THEY COULDN'T FIND ANY INSURERS, AND WITHOUT THE INSURANCE, THE GRANT WENT UNSPENT. This story, "Hawaii Inches Forward on Medical Marijuana, Rejects DEA Eradication Funds," may be accessed within the Drug Reform Coordination Network (DRCNet.org) past issues at: www.drcnet.org/wol/158.html#hawaiiactionIMPEACHMENT OF PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: I am attaching pages 657, 658, and 659 from the AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE 2d, 63C, PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, Sections 218 thru 222, which offers an excellent overview on the impeachment of public officers and employees in the United States, as of 1997. CLICK HERE to view these pages in PDF format. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD THE IMPEACHMENT DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.
THE TWENTY (20) TOP TECH "PRODUCT BRANDS" PERCEIVED By BRAZILIAN INTERNET USERS
Boycott Brazil is offering supporters the results of the annual "ImagePower brand survey" from international image consultancy Landor Associates, as to the staying power of 250 Tech-related brands in Brazil. The following list of vendors should be notified as the current BOYCOTT OF BRAZIL and requested to contact Brazilian Government Officials as to the torture and denial of due process to John Gregory Lambros: Disney; Sony; Brastemp; Napster; Nokia; Pentium; MP3; Microsoft; Philips; Linux; Motorola; AltaVista; Apple; HP; Kodak; Xerox; PlayStation; Time Warner; Internet Explorer; and Intel.
THE $64,000.00 QUESTION!!!!!!!
WHY HASN'T BRAZIL OR ANY OF ITS' CITIZENS OR CORPORATIONS SUED JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS AND/OR BOYCOTT BRAZIL FOR ALLEGING FALSE STATEMENTS OF FACT IN A COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING ABOUT BRAZIL AND ITS JUSTICE SYSTEM, IN VIOLATION OF § 43 OF THE LANHAM ACT????????
John Gregory Lambros is requesting the citizens and corporations of BRAZIL to bring legal action and injunctions against Lambros for the alleged falsity of statements of fact that appear within the BOYCOTT BRAZIL Web Site:
vww.brazilboycott.org
as the Boycott Brazil web site is material, in that it is intended to influence the purchasing decisions of every citizen globally, thus injury to the citizens and corporations of Brazil.
LAMBROS is requesting the citizens and corporations of Brazil to review the ELEMENTS of the LANHAM ACT § 43(a), codified at Title 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), as to false advertising claims: (1) a false statement of fact by the defendant in a commercial advertisement about its own or another's product; (2) the statement actually deceived or has the tendency to deceive a substantial segment of its audience; (3) the deception is material, in that it is likely to influence the purchasing decision; (4) the defendant caused its false statement to enter interstate commerce; and (5) the plaintiff has been or is likely to be injured as a result of the false statement, either by direct diversion of sales from itself to defendant or by a lessening of the goodwill associated with its products. To demonstrate falsity within the meaning of the Lanham Act, a plaintiff may show that the statement was literally false, either on its face or by necessary implication, or that the statement was literally true but likely to mislead or confuse consumers. See, SOUTHLAND SOD FARMS vs. STOVER SEED CO., 108 F.3d 1134, 1139 (9th Cir. 1997).
BOYCOTT BRAZIL supporters support all statements of fact within the Boycott Brazil web site and intend to support the boycott of all Brazilian products until Brazil offers an AFFIDAVIT OF FACT as to all issues within the Boycott Brazil web site.
Global citizens are drawing adverse inference from Brazil's silence. It is well established that in a criminal trial a judge or prosecutor may not suggest that the jury draw an adverse inference from a defendant's failure to testify. GRIFFIN vs. CALIFORNIA, 380 U.S. 609, 614-15 (1965). In civil proceedings, however, the Fifth Amendment does not forbid fact finders from drawing adverse inferences against a party who refuses to testify. BAXTER vs. PALMIGIANO, 425 U.S. 308, 318-20 (1976); LEFKOWITZ vs. CUNNINGHAM, 431 U.S. 801, 808 n.5 (1977).
BRAZIL IMPORTS ELECTRICITY! WHY?????
1. Brazil is in the top five countries importing electricity. WHY?????? The attached article from WIRED MAGAZINE, September 2003, pages 52 and 53 entitled "POWER UP/1" states Brazil currently produces 342.3 billion kilowatt hours of electricity and over ninety (90%) is produced from hydr. The WIRED MAGAZINE article is being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD "POWER UP!" ARTICLE, HERE IN PDF
BRAZIL RESISTS PLAN TO ALLOW SPOT INSPECTION OF NUCLEAR SITE. WHY???
December 28, 2003, Larry Rohter, New York Times, reported that Brazilian Minister of Science and Technology, ROBERTO AMARAL, stated in an interview that "It is necessary to be worried about what goes on out there, not here." After years of resistance, Brazil adhered to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in 1997 and has since permitted LIMITED, CONTROLLED VISITS to its nuclear facilities. But it has refused to approve an additional protocol that authorizes spot inspections. During Brazil's military dictatorship, from.1964 to 1985, the government clandestinely pursued a nuclear weapons program. In 1981, Brazil and IRAQ signed a nuclear cooperation agreement that, according to an IAEA report issued last year, led the government to ship 26.7 tons of uranium dioxide to BAGHDAD. The New York Times article is being offered from the December 28, 2003, Star Tribune, Page A19, in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD ARTICLE ON BRAZIL RESISTING INSPECTION OF NUCLEAR SITE HERE IN PDF.
BRAZIL VS. MONSANTO
Thirty-five (35) Brazilian exporters of SOYBEANS, accounting for 95% of Brazil's soy shipments, will take on MONSANTO if they try to stop ships hauling illegal Roundup Ready soybeans derived from seeds smuggled from Argentina and Paraguay. Monsanto has no PATENT for for Roundup Ready in China, Brazil's main soy market, which accounts for around a third of bean exports. The article, "BRAZIL v. MONSANTO" appeared in the November 2003, edition of SMALL FARM TODAY, Page 13. This article is being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD "BRAZIL vs. MONSANTO" ARTICLE HERE IN PDF.
BIRD FLU ROOSTING IN BRAZIL??? WAKE-UP BRAZIL!!!!!
1. March 20, 2006: Boycott Brazil is starting to receive reports that Brazilian Government Officials are withholding information as to the deadly strain of avian influenza, known as the H5Nl virus, is emerging in Brazil. In fact, Nancy Shute reported in the March 13, 2006, U.S. News & World Report, that a stray CAT in Germany died of bird flu and at least 94 people worldwide have died from H5NI. Id. at 13. Across Europe, demand for poultry has plummeted as the virus has spread westward. In Greece, poultry consumption has dropped 75 percent since H5NI was reported last month. In France, where bird flu has infected TURKEYS on commercial farms, farmers began vaccinating DUCKS AND GEESE. The U.S. Government announced that it had ORDERED 14 MILLION COURSES OF ANTIVIRAL DRUGS TO ADD TO THE 5.5 MILLION ALREADY STOCKPILED. THE FEDS WANT ENOUGH ANTIVIRAL TO TREAT 25 PERCENT OF THE POPULATION AGAINST A PANDEMIC FLU STRAIN.
2. March 21, 2006: BRAZIL WHY HAVEN'T YOU ORDERED ANTIVIRAL DRUGS FOR THE POPULATION OF BRAZIL AGAINST A PANDEMIC FLU STRAIN?????????
POST FREE CLASSIFIED ADS, BUSINESS DIRECTORY LISTING AND YELLOW PAGE LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS - WITHIN 50 COUNTRIES. SEARCHING FOR A SPECIAL ITEM? SEARCH OVER 35 MILLION CLASSIFIED ADS WITH OVER 500,000 NEW ADS DAILY!!! Visite: www.NoPayClassifieds.com.
LAMBROS FILES LAW SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL AND RIO de JANEIRO, BRAZIL FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT, RICO, FSIA, AND VIOLATIONS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSUMER PROTECTION PROCEDURES ACT (DCCPPA) - BY FALSELY REPRESENTING THE CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL TO U.S. CITIZENS, BY ALLOWING LIFE SENTENCES AND SENTENCES OVER THIRTY (30) YEARS. D.C. CODE §3904 CREATES A STATUTORY RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM IMPROPER TRADE PRACTICES. See the following DECEMBER 23, 2016 "COMPLAINT".
December 23, 2016: FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT LAW SUIT ("FSIA"), filed in the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Civil Division. LAMBROS vs. Federative Republic of Brazil; State of Rio de Janeiro of the Federative Republic of Brazil; and John & Jane Doe's. The "COMPLAINT" is 132 pages in length with an additional 4 pages of exhibits. Total of 136 pages in PDF FORMAT. DOCKET NO. 2017-CA-929-B.
DOWNLOAD "FSIA" COMPLAINT AGAINST BRAZIL IN PDF FORMAT - 136 TOTAL PAGES.
PORTUGUESE TRANSLATION OF: "FSIA" COMPLAINT AGAINST BRAZIL IN PORTUGUÊS. FORMAT - 132 PAGES IN PORTUGUESE WITH 4 PAGES OF EXHIBITS IN ENGLISH - AS PER COURT "ORDER" ON APRIL 4, 2017. DOWNLOAD HERE.
December 23, 2016: "FSIA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBROS vs. Federative Republic of Brazil, et al.. This is the "MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT." This motion is 10 pages in length with an additional 14 pages of exhibits. Total of 24 pages in PDF FORMAT. DOCKET NO. 2017-CA-929-B
DOWNLOAD "FSIA" MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN PDF FORMAT - 24 TOTAL PAGES.
MARCH 1, 2017: "FSIA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBR0S vs. Federative Republic of Brazil, et al., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. This motion is entitled "PLAINTIFF LAMBROS REQUESTS THE COURT TO "ORDER" THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF' S COMPLAINT, MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, SUMMONS, AND INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER TO ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFF LAMBROS IS PROCEEDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS OF FEBRUARY I0, 2017 "ORDER". See, Super. Ct. Cir. R. 54-II(i) - SERVICE OF PROCESS AND WITNESS FEES." This motion is 4 pages in length with 4 pages of exhibits. Total of 8 pages in PDF FORMAT.
DOWNLOAD "FSIA" MOTION TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF COMPLAINT IN PDF FORMAT - 8 TOTAL PAGES.
MARCH 1, 2017: "FSIA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBROS vs. Federative Republic of Brazil, et al., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. This motion is entitled "PLAINTIFF LAMBROS REQUESTS COURT "ORDER" TO ATTEND THE "INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE" AND ALL LATER PRETRIAL, SETTLEMENT, OR STATUS CONFERENCES BY TELEPHONE OR AUDIO-VIDEO CONNECTION. PLAINTIFF IS PROCEEDING PRO SE AN INCARCERATED AT U.S. PENITENTIARY LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS. See, Title 42 U.S.C. §1997e(f)." This motion is 3 pages in PDF FORMAT.
MARCH 3, 2017 : "FSlA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL : LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, ET AL., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. The Court "ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL." This "ORDER" is two (2) pages in length in PDF Format.
DOWNLOAD COURT'S "ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL" - 2 TOTAL PAGES.
MARCH 14, 2017: "FSIA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, ET AL., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. The Court "ORDER" responding to Lambros' March 1, 2017 request and approving Lambros to appear by phone at the initial scheduling conference. This "ORDER" is two (2) pages in length in PDF Format.
APRIL 4, 2017: "FSlA" SUIT AGAINST BRAZIL: LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, ET AL., Docket No. 2017-CA-929-B. The Court "ORDER" responding to Lambros' March 1, 2017 request for the Court to "ORDER" the officers of the court to effectuate service of Plaintiff's Complaint, etc. to defendants. The Court states Plaintiff must provide the exact name and mailing address of persons that will except service of process and ALSO A PORTUGUESE TRANSLATION OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT NEED TO BE SERVED. The stated Lambros has until June 5, 2017 to address the above issues or the Court will dismiss the defendants without prejudice. This "ORDER" is four (4) pages in length in PDF Format.
DOWNLOAD COURT'S "ORDER" REQUIRING LAMBROS TO TRANSLATE DOCUMENT - 4 TOTAL PAGES IN PDF FORMAT.
JULY 5, 2019: Lambros files response to Brazil’s attorneys - FOLEY HOAG LLP - Motion entitled, “NOTICE OF REMOVAL” filed on June 27, 2019. This motion was filed within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929(TSC). Defendants attorneys believe they have the right to not obey Title 28 USC 1446(b), which only allows Notice of removal to be filed within 30 days after defendants receive an initial pleading - complaint. Defendants received Lambros initial pleading - complaint on OCTOBER 6, 2017 (UPS INTERNATIONAL CONFIRMED SERVICE OF PLEADINGS WERE RECEIVED BY THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE IN BRASILIA, BRAZIL). Therefore, Defendants waited Twenty-one (21) months after receiving copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claims for relief, before filing Notice of Removal on June 27, 2019. This is 20 months more than 28 USC 1446(b) allows. Also, Defendant do not understand that the U.S. District Court DOES NOT have SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION! Again, this Plaintiff believes the U.S. District Court DOES NOT have jurisdiction, as the Superior Court entered DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANTS ON APRIL 8, 2019, AND ORDERED AN “Ex Parte Proof Hearing” (Damage Hearing) ON MAY 15, 2019. See, LOCKHART vs. CADE, 728 A.2d 65 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, March 4, 1999)(“entry of default ‘operates as an admission by the defaulting party that there are no issues of liability, but leaves the issue of damages unresolved until entry of judgment’”) Plaintiff Lambros has no further obligation to prove Liability. This "MOTION" is nine (9) pages in length, with seven (7) pages of exhibits - total of 16 pages in PDF Format.
AUGUST 12, 2019: Lambros files “MOTION REQUESTING COURT TO ORDER DEFENDANTS TO POST A SURETY BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF “THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO BILLION, FORTY MILLION DOLLARS” ($362,040,000,000.00) DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE REMOVAL OF CLAIMS FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO THIS FEDERAL COURT. PLAINTIFF LAMBROS IS BEING PREJUDICED AS THE NONMOVING PARTY IN THIS REMOVAL PROCESS, AS TO HIS LOSSES SUSTAINED AS A RESULT OF BEING FORCED TO FORGO EXECUTION OF DAMAGE AWARDS ON JUDGMENT ON JULY 5, 2019, WITHIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA”, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. The information and exhibits within this filing contains three (3) exhibits that will assist the court. Defendants’ law firm, FOLEY HOAG LLP, filed a “CIVIL COVER SHEET” on June 27, 2019, stating the DEMAND FOR DAMAGES ARE “THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO BILLION, FORTY MILLION DOLLARS” ($362,040,000,000.00). See, EXHIBIT A. (This amount is for surety bond requirements). This "MOTION" is 7 pages in length, with three (3) sets of exhibits - total of 13 pages in PDF Format.
AUGUST 20, 2019: Lambros files: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ OFFERING CLARIFICATION OF FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN DEFENDANTS “OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S ‘OFFERING OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE LIMITED TO ISSUES RAISED BY DEFENDANTS’ [SIC]”. FILED ON AUGUST 12, 2019, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. The information and exhibits within this filing contains three (3) exhibits that will assist the court. This "MOTION" is 4 pages in length, with three (3) sets of exhibits - total of 10 pages in PDF Format.
OCTOBER 4, 2019: Lambros files: “PLAINTIFF LAMBROS REQUESTS COURT “ORDER” TO ATTEND ALL PRETRIAL, SETTLEMENT, OR STATUS CONFERENCES BY TELEPHONE OR AUDIO-VIDEO CONNECTION. PLAINTIFF IS PROCEEDING PRO SE AND FORMA PAUPERIS AND IS ON FEDERAL SUPERVISED RELEASE, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. The information and exhibits within this filing contains one (1) exhibit that will assist the court. This "MOTION" is 2 pages in length, with one (1) set of exhibits - total of 3 pages in PDF Format.
December 4, 2020: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT’S FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al. attorney’s law firm FOLEY HOAG LLP, “MOTION TO STAY LOCAL CIVIL RULE 16.3 REQUIREMENTS” - FILED ON NOVEMBER 24, 2020, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 8 pages in length, with eleven (11) pages of exhibits - a total of 19 pages in PDF Format.
December 7, 2020: PLAINTIFF LAMBROS' OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al. attorney's law firm FOLEY HOAG LLP, "MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT" - FILED ON NOVEMBER 24, 2020, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 19 pages in length, with six (6) pages of exhibits - a total of 25 pages in PDF Format.
May 25, 2021: PLAINTIFF Lambros files, “MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 59(e)”, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 13 pages in length, with fourteen (14) pages of exhibits - a total of 27 pages in PDF Format.
May 27, 2021: PLAINTIFF Lambros files, “ADDENDUM TO MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 59(e)”, within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 9 pages in length, with five (5) pages of exhibits - a total of 14 pages in PDF Format.
June 24, 2021: PLAINTIFF Lambros files, “PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al.:
“MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS
THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(E)” Filed on June 14, 2021 (Document # 39, 39-1 and 39-3)
AND
“SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(E)” Filed on June 15, 2021 (Document # 40, 40-1 and 40-2)” within the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action No. 19-cv-1929. This "MOTION" is 8 pages in length, with zero (0) pages of exhibits - a total of 8 pages in PDF Format.
“MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(E)” Filed on
June 14, 2021 (Document # 39, 39-1 and 39-3)
AND
“SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(E)” Filed on June 15, 2021 (Document # 40, 40-1 and 40-2)”
This "MOTION" is 8 pages in length, with zero (0) pages of exhibits - a total of 8 pages in PDF Format.
November 12, 2021: Appellant - Plaintiff Lambros files his “STATEMENT OF ISSUES TO BE RAISED” - total of six (6) issues - within the United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia, LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al., Civil Action Number: 21-7121. The Appeals court filed Appellant Lambros “Notice of Appeal” on October 28, 2021 and Ordered several documents to be filed. This "MOTION" is a total of 4 pages in PDF Format.
February 3, 2022: Appellant - Plaintiff John Lambros files his “APPEAL BRIEF” - total of four (4) issues - within the United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia, JOHN LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, Civil Action Number: 21-7121. This "APPEAL BRIEF" is 65 pages in length, with thirty (30) pages of exhibits - a total of 95 pages in PDF Format.
April 2, 2022: Appellant - Plaintiff John Lambros files his “REPLY BRIEF” to Brazil’s Attorney’s - Foley Hoag LLP - objections to Lambros’ Appeal within the United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia, JOHN LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, Civil Action Number: 21-7121. The “REPLY BRIEF” is 16 pages in length, with twenty-three (23) pages of exhibits - a total of 39 pages in PDF Format.
June 13, 2022: Appellant - Plaintiff John Lambros files his “Petition For Rehearing En Banc” - total of three (3) issues - within the United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia, JOHN LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, Civil Action Number: 21-7121. This "PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC" is 20 pages in length, with an one (1) page exhibit - a total of 21 pages in PDF Format.