Julianne McKinney is
director of the
Electronic Surveillance Project Association of National Security Alumni
A report on the experiences of 25 survivors
of EM Harrassment
Whither the KGB?
In February 1974, Georgetown University's Center for Strategic and International
Studies (CSIS) hosted discussions on the plight of dissenters in the Soviet
Union, and on a means by which the U.S. Government might most effectively
intervene. Highlights of these discussions are reported in "Understanding
the Solzhenitzyn Affair: Dissent and its Control in the USSR," (CSIS,
KGB strategies were addressed in some detail during these discussions.
It was noted that the KGB's success depended on the extensive use of informant
networks and agent provocateurs; and, following Brezhnev's rise to power,
on the use of drugs and psychiatrists for further purpose of manipulation
and control. Shadowing, bugging, slandering, blacklisting and other related
tactics were also cited as serving KGB purpose. Participants in the conference
agreed that the KGB's obvious intent was to divide and isolate the populace,
to spread fear, and to silent dissenters.
Agencies of our own government are on record as having employed precisely
these same tactics on a recurrent basis. The Church and Rockefeller Committee
Hearings in the mid-70's purportedly put an end to these practices. Based
on recent developments, it would appear that the CIA's and FBI's Operations
MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO (the focus of these Senate Committee and
Vice-President-level Hearings) were instead merely driven underground.
We are now in contact with a total of 25 individuals, scattered throughout
the United states, who firmly believe they are being harassed by agencies
of the U.S. Government. Others have been brought to our attention whom
we will be contacting in the future. The majority of these individuals
claim that their harassment and surveillance began in 1989.
The methods reportedly employed in these harassment campaigns bear a striking
resemblance to those attributed to the CIA and FBI during Operations MKULTRA,
MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The only difference now is that electronic harassment
and experimentation also appear to be (more blatantly) involved.
The Berlin Wall is down, Communism is in the midst of a death rattle,
and the KGB no longer poses the threat which purportedly served to justify
the U.S. Government's resort to such operations as MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and
COINTELPRO. The KGB, since 1989, has been reduced to an increasingly distant
Reactivation of surveillance/harassment/mind-control operations in this
country suggest that the KGB, as an institution, was never the real threat.
A KGB "mentality," which is underlying pragmatic contempt for civil liberties,
appears, instead, to have been the driving force behind MKULTRA, MHCHAOS
and COINTELPRO, and the operations now being reported to us.
The KGB "mentality" is a matter of personal predilection, not ideology.
Its objective is power and control, regardless of human cost. It is a
corrupting, cancerous influence, which feeds on fear, conformity and government
Four months ago, when this Project commenced, we approached these complaints
of government harassment and experimentation with an admitted "high degree
of caution." We are no longer skeptical. The growing numbers of independent
complaints and the similarities between those complaints cannot be ignored.
Under the circumstances, the KGB should be proud of itself. As a "mentality,"
the KGB appears to be accomplishing more in "burying this country" from
within, than it could ever have hoped to have achieved as an institution.
It would appear that this country has a serious problem on its hands which
needs to be resolved.
Part I of this report, which is reprinted from the June-July edition of
the association's publication, Unclassified, preliminarily addresses the
complaints brought to our attention as of July 1992. Our objective, as
noted, was to weigh the legitimacy of those complaints in terms of the
directed-energy technologies reportedly involved. Part II discusses the
overt and covert patterns of harassment identified as a result of our
investigations, to date. A part of our objective, here, is to limit the
success of such operations in the future, by according them widespread
In Part II, we do not identify individuals by name, both to honor their
privacy and because our investigations have not been completed. Part II,
like Part I, is a preliminary finding. Our focus is on the similarities
of the complaints being received -- similarities which Federal and State
legislators, the courts, the FBI, local law enforcement agencies, the
medical and psychiatric professions, and organizations such as the ACLU
and Amnesty International have so far chosen to ignore.
We frankly find it curious that more attention and creditability is being
accorded purported victims of UFO experiences and spectral visitations,
than to persons who complain of systematic harassment and experimentation
by the U.S. Government, involving technologies which the U.S. Government
is only now grudgingly admitting to possess. These complaints require
investigation. In due course (and provided financial support is obtained),
we hope to be able to acquire the technology and supportive medical expertise
to substantiate the claims being made. We also hope to alter the institutional
mindset that U.S. Intelligence can be trusted. History, repeatedly, has
PART 1 - THE PROBLEM SURFACES
[Reprinted form the June-July 1992 edition of UNCLASSIFIED (Vol. IV, No.
3), published by The Association of National Security Alumni, Washington,
The August-September 1991 issue of UNCLASSIFIED reviewed Hamline University's
"Public Administration" report on the resolution of MKULTRA cases in 1988.
Although the shocking details of medical ethics abuses by the U.S. and
Canadian governments were amply detailed, Washington and Ottawa -- citing
national security and government privilege -- stalled for so long that
cases never came to trial. the surviving victims settled for a pittance
in an out-of-court settlement.
Since no individuals or agencies were held legally accountable, the door
was left open for possible resumption of similar "mind-control" activities.
In the context of that article, we mentioned briefly that some half-dozen
people had contacted us with appeals for assistance in ending what they
believe to be electronic harassment and mind-control experimentation,
possibly involving the CIA. We decided to take a closer look at the situation.
We are now in touch with approximately a dozen individuals throughout
the United States who appear to be targets of harassment and mind-control
experimentation involving directed-energy technologies. [By mid-November
1992, the number had increased to 25.]
Typically, persons who complain of being "zapped by radio waves" and of
"hearing voices" are stigmatized as psychotic, delusional or schizophrenic.
Being mindful of this, as well as aware of the treatment accorded UFO
and psychic phenomena "freaks," we approach this subject with a high degree
of caution. Based on our preliminary investigation, including interviews
with the affected individuals, we conclude that the matter is serious
and should be pursued further.
The Existing Directed-Energy Arsenal
Our first step was to determine what, if any technology exists which
might be used for electronic harassment. The information was found in
a "white paper" published in 1991 by the U.S. Global Strategy Council
-- a Washington-based organization, under the chairmanship of Ray Cline,
former Deputy Director of the CIA, who maintains very close ties with
the U.S. Intelligence community. The "white paper" describes the foreign
and domestic uses foreseen for laser weapons, isotropic radiators, infrasound,
non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse generators, and high-powered microwave
The term, "non-lethal," used to describe this technology is misleading.
the energy emitted from all of these weapons can kill people when appropriately
amplified. At lower levels of amplified, they can cause extreme forms
of physical discomfort and debilitation.
The Department of the Army (DA) identifies these same weapons as "non-conventional."
They were so identified in an exhibit at a DA-sponsored symposium on "The
Soldier As A System," in Crystal City, VA, on June 30, 1992. Beta wave
incapacitators were separately mentioned during the symposium as being
particular interested to the U.S. Marine Corps.
We discussed these "non-conventional" directed-energy weapons with Mr.
Vernon Shisler, manager of the exhibit and the Army's delegate to NATO
in matters pertaining to "The Soldier As A System." Mr. Shisler acknowledged
not only that directed-energy weapons are in the DoD's arsenal, but also
that the American soldier will remain vulnerable to their effects, should
they be employed in the battlefield.
The U.S. Global Strategy Council recognizes the issue of vulnerability,
as well, and urges ongoing research into effective countermeasures.
Interested readers may want to send for the U.S. Global Strategy Council's
complete project proposal on this subject: (Title: Nonlethality: Development
of a National Policy and Employing Nonlethal Means in a New Strategic
Era, prepared by Janet Morris). A number of references in this Proposal
to unidentified, elusive "enemies" of the U.S. Government and the potential
domestic applications of this "non-lethal" technology invite serious consideration
by the public at large.
The Council's address is 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006,
BIOEFFECTS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION
Research into biological and psychological effects of exposure to microwave
radiation is voluminous. The U.S. public has been led to believe that
the former Soviet Union leads in this research. The fact is, the CIA and
DoD [Department of Defense] have jointly pursued precisely the same research
since commencement of Project Pandora in the 1950's. The current primary
users of this research appear to be the CIA, DoD, the National Security
Agency (NSA) and the Department of Energy (DoE).
The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) has participated in
this research since Project Pandora. In 1973, WRAIR discovered that externally-induced
auditory input could be achieved by means of pulsed microwave audiograms,
or analogs of spoken words' sounds. The effect on the receiving end is
the (schizophrenic) sensation of "hearing voices" which are no part of
the recipients' own thought processes.
The experiment prompted the following comment in "The Body Electric: Electromagnetism
and the Foundation of Life," by Robert O. Becker, M.D., and Gary Selden
(Wm. Morrow & Company, NY, 1985): "Such a device has obvious applications
in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with 'voices' or
deliver undetected instructions to a programmed assassin."
This research has continued, and the results are published in various
publicly available scientific and technical journals. Interested readers
might consult, for example: Lin, James C., Electromagnetic Interaction
With Biological Systems (Plenum Press, NY, 1989). Professor Lin, then
with the Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Chicago,
has published a number of books and articles on this subject. [He has
more recently informed us that he had designed the experiment referred
above in Dr. Becker's book.]
WRAIR has more recently been studying the biological effects of exposure
to high power microwave radiation. WRAIR presented a paper on this subject
to a DoD-sponsored symposium on "MW [microwave] Weapons" at the Naval
Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, in mid-1989.
A matter of interest to us is why WRAIR should be experimenting with auditory
effects of pulsed microwave audiograms. Also, recent statements by an
Army psychiatrist assigned to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC)
suggest that WRAIR may be experimenting upon select psychiatric inpatients
with microwaves. This, too, is a matter to us.
The Government's past record of abuses in the area of civil rights
is well documented. Within the past 30 years alone, we have witnessed
the effects of Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO.
Primarily because of MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, Executive Orders
and implementing regulations were published which prohibited military
and CIA domestic covert intelligence operations. Experiments on involuntary
human subjects, and the surveillance of/collection of personal information
on U.S. citizens, except under strictly regulated conditions were also
Congressional committees were created to oversee compliance with these
(quasi-) legal prohibitions. We have evidence that this is not being done.
Moreover, where there are laws and, in this case, no laws enacted, there
are loopholes, as well as individual and institutions who deliberately
capitalize upon the existence of loopholes. Iran-Contra is one of the
more blatant recent examples. Loopholes are also found in government resort
to "black" intelligence and weapons programs, in the use of contractors,
and in the absence of clear definitions of such terms as "national security"
and "national security risk."
Executive Orders and regulations which currently limit U.S. Intelligence
activities do not extend to non-intelligence government agencies or to
their contractors. If fact, Executive Order 12333 specifies that government
contractors do not need to know that their services support U.S. Intelligence
In its report of July 8, 1992, the Senate Subcommittee on Oversight of
Government Management addresses the problem of tracking funds granted
to government-contracted research and development (R&D) centers. The report
notes that the problem is compounded by DoD's penchant for creating hard-to-monitor
"shell" contractors as disbursement centers for funding programs.
Neither shell contractors nor their subcontractors are directly accountable
to Congress. Being beyond Congressional oversight, they have the license
to operate as Government surrogates in intelligence operations about which,
"officially" they know nothing.
In this context, a publication disseminated at DA's "The Soldier As A
System" symposium noted that the Army's Research and Technology Program
sponsors 42 laboratories and R&D centers, employing approximately 10,000
scientists and engineers. The annual budget of $1.3 billion is only a
small part of overall DoD research spending.
Weapons research, which includes the development and testing of "non-lethal"
weapons, is not governed by laws restricting the activities of U.S. Intelligence
agencies, though it may be presumed that these agencies contribute to
and benefit from such research.
1. The technology exists for the types of harassment and experimentation
reported to us.
2. About a dozen U.S. citizens have informed us of continuing experiments
with effects which directed-energy weapons are designed to produce.
3. U.S. Government-sponsored research into the bioeffects of exposure
to microwave radiation is extensive and continuing.
4. The U.S. Government has a past record of having engaged in mind-control
experimentation; and various agencies of the Government have a record
of circumventing legal restrictions upon their activities.
5. Neither Congress nor the courts appear willing to look closely into
"black" intelligence and weapons procurement programs.
6. A number of U.S. Government agencies might have interest in testing
directed-energy technologies on U.S. citizens under non-clinical/non-controlled
circumstances -- DoD, to test ranges and degrees of "non-lethality"; DoE,
to explore "safety" limits; CIA, to test "mind-control" capabilities,
and NSA, for technological refinement.
PART II -- OVERT AND COVERT HARASSMENT
Since publication of the preceding article less than four months ago,
the association of National Security Alumni/Electronic Surveillance Project
has heard from an additional 13 individuals who report both overt harassment
and a range of symptoms which coincide with the known effects of exposure
to microwaves, electromagnetic/radio frequency (RF) radiation and/or infrasound.
The similarity of these symptoms will be addressed in greater detail in
future Project reports. Suffice it to say, at this point, that the physical
and psychological symptoms being reported to us are consistent with the
effects which directed-energy weapons are designed to produce. Indeed,
the numerous afflictions (or "inflictions") being reported appear to parallel
standard torture "sequelae,"(1) (aftereffects).
Overt Harassment -- which obviously is meant to be observed -- may
be intended to "precondition" individuals for eventual long-term electronic
harassment. Persons terrified by unexplained overt harassment are not
likely to cope with the sudden onset of electronic harassment in any more
reasoned fashion. This phased pattern of harassment is apparent in all
of the cases now being investigated. The fact that the overt harassment
continues in these cases even after the electronic targeting commences
suggest that the objective is to maintain long-term extremes of stress.
Many of the overt harassment tactics discussed below are surfacing in
cases which (so far) have not involved discernible forms of electronic
harassment. These are cases involving so-called "whistleblowers" who,
because of their inside knowledge of certain potentially newsworthy events,
pose particular threats of embarrassment to the Government or to government-affiliated
employers. We have noticed that electronic harassment is beginning to
surface as a form of retaliation against persons who try to assist electronic
"harassees." Retaliation suggest loss of control. Under these circumstances,
we are not entirely confident that "whistleblowers" will continue to be
exempted from this type of harassment in the long term.
The individuals now in touch with the Project describe their circumstances
as involving most, if not all, of the following overt forms of harassment:
* Sudden, bizarrely-rude treatment, isolation and acts of harassment and
vandalism by formerly friendly neighbors.
* Harassing telephone calls, which continue even after the targeted individual
obtains new, unlisted telephone numbers.
* Mail interception, theft and tampering.
* Noise campaigns.
While unrelenting harassing telephone calls might be considered in this
context, other tactics are employed. Blaring horns, whistles, sirens,
garbage disposal (run concurrently in apartment settings, for excessively
prolonged periods of time), and amplified transmissions of recorded "general
racket" have been used on a recurrent basis under circumstances intended
to persuade the individual that he or she is under surveillance.
In all of these cases, the individuals' neighbors apparently pretend to
be oblivious and/or indifferent to these sudden, continuous explosions
Door slamming is also a popular pastime, particularly in apartment buildings.
One individual reported that, during a peak period of harassment, the
neighbor across the hall began entering and leaving his apartment every
10 minutes, slamming his door loudly on each occasion. This was a daily
occurrence, encompassing periods of several hours, over a period of several
months. It is apparently served to trigger a door-slamming "chain reaction"
on the part of neighbors both on that floor and on the floors immediately
above and below. When our contact politely asked her immediate neighbor
to close her door more quietly, he slammed the door in her face. Prior
to commencement of this harassment, the neighbor had apparently been quite
friendly and courteous.
In another case, the primary door-slammer is an employee of Radix Systems,
Inc., Rockville, MD, a DoD contractor engaged in the "super-secret" research
and development of some type of electronic equipment.
Several individuals reported recurrent, loud, strange noises in their
ventilation systems during the preliminary stages of their harassment.
One individual complained of being recurrently awakened in the middle
of the night by the sound of wires being fed into his (independent) ventilation
system. On checking further, he found that a tubular construction had
been built into his vent system which appears to lead to the apartment
upstairs. His upstairs neighbor is employed by the Department of Justice.
A number of individuals report that occupants of upstairs and downstairs
apartments appear to follow them from room to room, tapping on the floor
or engaging in other activities which appear intended to advertise an
The Justice Department employee mentioned above went as far as to offer
an unsolicited apology to her downstairs neighbor for an all-night "pacing
about" in her bedroom (in the event he had happened to notice it). She
claimed to be an insomniac. The pacing-about continued during her recent
36-hour absence from the area. When her contact politely alerted her to
the fact that her apartment had apparently been entered during her absence,
she told him, in effect, to mind his own business and then immediately
complained to the building manager that he was stalking her.
She conveniently forgot to inform the building manager that she had assiduously
"courted" this individual for several months, without success; and that
she had been stealing his newspapers on a regular basis. (On one occasion,
she handed him a week's accumulation of those papers, claiming that they
had been left outside the door of another apartment. Her reason for collecting
and saving the newspapers which had not been delivered to her directly
* Recurrent confrontations by unusually hostile strangers; and comments
by strangers which appear intended to evoke "paranoid" reactions.
In this context, we note that several individuals have reported confrontations
with "homeless" people who, on closer examination, were found to be fastidiously
clean, though garbed in offbeat fashion (wigs included). The same "eccentric"
confronted two of the individuals in contact with us, at separate distant
locations. He is reported as having feigned mental illness on both occasions,
and as having apparently enjoyed creating a public scene.
* Entries into the individual's residence, during late-night hours while
he/she is sleeping, and/or during the day when the individual is elsewhere.
In virtually all such cases, the burglars leave evidence of their visits,
such as relocating objects, or by committing petty and not-so-petty acts
of vandalism. In two cases, the burglar's "calling card" was to slaughter
caged pets, leaving the mangled carcasses inside their locked cages.
In one case, the burglar stole several pieces of correspondence and left
a packet of crack cocaine behind as a "calling card." Our contact in this
case -- an individual who has no criminal record and no history of experimentation
with drugs -- is also being harassed (stalked) by a police officer of
her community. One of his recent acts was to "frame" her with a drug possession
charge. After pulling her off the road (a frequent pastime) and subjecting
her to an illegal search (done, twice, so far), he conveniently managed
to find a glassine packet of cocaine eight feet away, in front of his
squad car. He retrieved the packet with his fingers and then charged her
with Possession. Our contact found the packet of crack cocaine in her
apartment shortly after this investigator reminded the attorney handling
her case that the police officer had smudged his only piece of evidence
with his own fingerprints. It would appear that someone is interested
in correcting that police officer's oversight.
In another case, the individual reports that a tremendous amount of money
has been stolen from a hiding place in her apartment, within hours after
she had withdrawn the money from her bank. There was no obvious signs
of entry into her apartment. The police conducted a cursory inquiry which
failed to produce evidence of a crime worthy of investigation. (This case
is an anomaly. Money is usually not stolen. Documents appear to be the
preferred objects of theft, when theft occur.)
In another case, the burglars replaced installed lightbulbs with "exploding"
bulbs, many of which were 'Made in Hungary.' The lightbulbs are now in
* Rapidly deteriorating health, generally of a digestive nature.
In two cases of the cases reported, massive rectal bleeding accompanied
the sudden onset of sever gastrointestinal disturbances. One of these
individuals abruptly terminated the deteriorative process simply by changing
the locks on her door.
* Sleep disruption/deprivation
This is achieved by means of overt and electronic harassment. Sleep deprivation,
as a tactic, invariably surfaces when the targeted individual begins exhibiting
a strong emotional and irrational response to the other forms of harassment.
* Vandalism of privately-owned vehicles
Vehicles invite peculiarly ferocious attacks in these harassment campaigns
-- slashed tires, smashed windows, oil drainage, oil contamination, destruction
of electronic components and batteries (frequently involving wildly fluctuating,
grounded fuel gages, often within range of weapons research facilities
and/or other microwave emitters); and suddenly failed brakes and clutches
(possible involving anti-traction polymers, which are also in DoD's "non-lethal"
weapons arsenal). Recurrent auto thefts have also been reported.
Two individuals reported finding their oil contaminated immediately after
having the oil changed by reputable mechanics. In one of these cases,
the oil viscosified (thickened) while the individual was driving through
a remote rural area. Her car ground to a halt. Getting the "gunk" cleaned
out of her engine proved to be an expensive ordeal. (Viscosification agents
are also lauded by the U.S. Global Strategy Council as serving "non-lethal"
strategic purposes -- a topic discussed in Part I of this publication.
Had this woman been assaulted while awaiting help in the said isolated
area, the "non-lethal" attributes of viscosification agents might have
Most of those who have experienced these attacks on a recurring basis
have abandoned driving all together -- an objective apparently sought
by their tormentors as a means of increasing their isolation.
* Staged accidents.
The majority of those in touch with us have reported these types of experiences.
One individual, for example, was tailgated at a high rate of speed by
two vehicles, while concurrently being threatened with a gun by one of
the vehicles' occupants. Two others narrowly avoided what happened to
be deliberately attempted collisions by drivers who quickly sped away
from the scene. One avoided three attempts in four days at being run off
the road. One survived by being run off the road in two incidents within
a one-week period, which resulted in "totaling" of her two vehicles. Another
narrowly avoided being crushed into an expressway retaining wall, on four
occasions, by an off-duty metro bus, as well as, within the same time
frame, being "fried" by two suddenly-malfunctioned household appliances
which subsequently repaired themselves. It should be noted that, in some
of these cases, "accidental" deaths do occur. One individual in contact
with us reported that his mother drove off a cliff to her death, during
a period when he was researching evidence that a still-respected, high
level State Department official had passed A-bomb secrets to the Soviet
Government during World War II. The accident occurred shortly after her
car had undergone routine maintenance. She was returning from a dental
appointment when the accident occurred. Witnesses state that it appeared
that she had suddenly stepped on the accelerator before running off the
road. The accident served to terminate this person's research project.
We also look into the recent death of a woman in Lexington, MO, who was
killed when the brakes on her tractor failed. We are informed that she
had been collecting affidavits from persons who believe they are the targets
of government harassment and experimentation when her "accident" occurred.
We are also informed that these affidavits have disappeared.
Suicides might also qualify as "staged accidents," particularly where
"plausibly deniable" government involvement has been surfaced. We are
currently looking into the recent suicide of a man in Trappe, PA, who,
as early as 1981, had asked the FBI and CIA to intervene in his case.
We have copies of that early correspondence. The man, a former U.S. Army
radar technician, had a highly technical and -- given date of his correspondence
-- "precocious" grasp of the experimental objectives apparently being
sought in his case. It is apparent from his correspondence that he had
wanted to believe that the Soviets were conducting these experiments.
The FBI and CIA, of course, did not intervene. We are informed that members
of his family have also been targets of this experimentation.
* Isolation of the individual from members of his/her family -- virtually
assured when highly focused forms of electronic harassment commence.
The exception to this is when elderly parents and young children in the
family become targets for apparent purposes of intimidation. This situation
has been reported in eight of our cases, to date.
One individual (driven to extremes of stress by ongoing electronic harassment
focusing on her children) killed one child in an effort to protect her
from further pain.(2) It appears that lasers were being used in this individual's
case. The targeting intensified after she called the Soviet Embassy to
report the harassment, which she believed to be U.S. Government-sponsored.
It became even more deadly when, in a further show of defiance, she then
called the representative of the Iraqi Government to portray the U.S.
Government's war in the Middle East as "hypocritical." She is now hospitalized
in a midwestern facility, where, apparently, the experimentation is now
(That psychiatric facility is in a State where a disproportionate number
of complaints of electronic harassment are beginning to surface. It is
also within range of a U.S. Air Force base which houses a "super secret"
research facility. We are currently looking into information that spouses
and children of persons employed on that USAF base may be the targets
of involuntary experimentation involving direct-energy weapons technologies.)
Another individual, during a telephone conversation, was told by an employee
of a local power company that, if she valued the lives of her children,
she would drop her public opposition to the company's installation of
high power lines. Since receiving that threat, the individual's 11-year-old
daughter has been reduced to extremes of pain, resulting in her recurrent
hospitalization for treatment of illnesses which cannot be diagnosed.
It is also apparent to this individual that her three-year-old son is
on the receiving end of externally-induced auditory input. (DoE figures
prominently in this case.)
* Progressive financial impoverishment, brought on by termination of the
individual's employment, and compounded by expenses associated with the
The majority of those now in contact with the Project -- educated, white-collar
professionals -- have lost their jobs. Termination of employment in many
of these cases involved prefatory harassment by the employer and co-workers,
which coincided with the other overt forms of harassment discussed above.
The overt harassment tactics are being described as recurrent, non-sequential
and overlapping. As noted above, the overt harassment continues even after
the electronic harassment commences.
FAILURE OF "ESTABLISHMENT" SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Those individuals who have tried to resolve their respective situations
through resort to "establishment" channels have invariably encountered
* Apathy, indifference and/or professed helplessness on the part of members
of Congress and state legislators.
* Dismissal and/or attempted discrediting by psychiatrists who refuse
to include the terms, "government harassment," "mind-control experimentation"
and "torture" in their vocabulary.
Several individuals, thinking the psychiatrists might help to alleviate
the extreme stress associated with their harassment, and accorded "treatment"
which clearly pointed to corporation between their psychiatrists and members
of the U.S. Intelligence community. One such psychiatrist, in fact, bragged
about being a member of the U.S. Intelligence "inner circle," informing
our contact that her harassment was a "Pavlovian Experiment," intended
to "break" her.
* Lack of interest, courage and/or competency in legal circles.
Few of those in contact with us have been able to acquire legal assistance
-- not helped by their straitened financial circumstances. Most have found
that few attorneys are willing to risk their careers by pursuing cases
involving what is believed to be government-sponsored harassment or experimentation.
A few attorneys reportedly engaged in egregious violations of codes of
professional conduct, in what appear to have been deliberate efforts at
sabotaging our contacts' cases. Subsequent attempts by two individuals
at obtaining legal redress were met with stonewalling, obstruction, and
high-level denials of wrongdoing.
* Refusal of the mass media to address this topic, except in those cases
where suspected experimentees have been driven to committing murder or
Such cases (particularly where an individual has claimed to be a victim
of CIA-directed mind-control involving auditory input) are treated by
the press as "curiosities." An example of this is the individual who shot
a Navy officer outside the Pentagon in mid-1991.(3) He claimed to be a
victim of CIA mind control, involving auditory input. According to the
press, "he worried 'about being run over by trains'..." (ref. incident
described in following paragraph). He is now permanently residing in a
psychiatric facility. He, being institutionalized, and others in the preliminary
stages of his predicament are no longer of interest to the media.
Another recent case which received short-lived press attention(4) involved
a woman diagnosed as having "suffered from periods of confusion" who climbed
over a fence onto a railroad track and walked into an oncoming train.
Because the incident occurred in a community in which an unusually large
number of mind-control experiments have been reported, we are looking
into the situation. The woman was reportedly "under a physician's care"
because of her "periods of confusion." A family member described the physician
to this investigator as "a psychiatrist." We find that the alleged "psychiatrist"
is a General Practitioner, otherwise non-accredited, practicing out of
his home. We find also that the suicide may have been witnessed under
peculiarly-timed circumstances by an alleged "homeless" person who has
since disappeared. Needless to say, our interest has been whetted.
* Refusal and/or inability of local police to intervene.
The tendency of local police is to dismiss an individual's complaints
of government harassment as the ravings of a "fruitcake." In one case,
discussed above, it is apparent that one police officer is actively cooperating
in the harassment. Some police agencies, while acknowledging the reality
of the situation, hesitate to intervene in cases involving what they believe
to be U.S. Intelligence. On a few occasions, certain police officials
did attempt to intervene, based on what they perceived to be evidence
of a systematic harassment/illegal surveillance campaign. Absent a clear
mandate to prosecute "stalkers" acting under the aegis of U.S. Intelligence,
the police obviously had their hands tied.
* Refusal of the FBI to intervene in any of the cases brought to our attention
FBI spokesmen do acknowledge that they have received a large number of
requests for assistance from "mentally disturbed persons" who believe
that they are being "zapped by radio waves" and/or "are hearing voices..."
"from Mars, that is."
In one case, an FBI spokesman reacted in a angry, defensive and bizarre
fashion when our contact briefly alluded to PROJECT SLAMMER as possibly
being related to her surveillance. (PROJECT SLAMMER is a CIA-funded study,
managed by CIA and FBI behavioral scientist, which explores the "mental
make-up" of alleged security risks, along with their family members and
close associates. Participants in PROJECT SLAMMER include NSA, DIA, and
Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence.)
Until PROJECT SLAMMER was mentioned, the FBI spokesman's approach in this
case was to politely and redundantly explain that the law, as currently
constructed, prevents the FBI's intervening in this individual's case.
What she briefly pointed out that the surveillance activities might fall
under the purview of PROJECT SLAMMER, the spokesman's response was to
abruptly and angrily declaim, "You don't know who is conducting that surveillance!
You don't know if that is a state police surveillance!...or a local police
surveillance! It could be a totally unrelated operation! You don't know
who is conducting that surveillance! [etc., etc.]!"
It was apparent from that response that the FBI was at least acknowledging
the existence of a surveillance, if in somewhat emotional fashion. The
individual in question subsequently furnished acquired evidence to the
local police, who made it clear that they are no participants in the surveillance
which, based on the evidence, pointedly suggest that our contact is the
* Refusal of inability of the ACLU and Amnesty International to intervene.
Both organizations acknowledge receiving many complaints from persons
claiming to be the targets of some type of electronic harassment. An ACLU
spokes-woman characterized the complaints as appearing to be rational,
except in a few cases. The complaints are not being investigated, she
said, because of "limited resources." We have to wonder, of course, why
the ACLU could recently find resources to defend the rights of prostitutes
and the Ku Klux Klan, yet remains incapable of intervening in cases such
as we are now pursuing.
Amnesty International recently informed one of our contacts that they
could not intervene in her case because their focus is on the U.S. Government's
treatment of prison inmates. While incarceration does appear to be one
sought-for objective in this harassment/mind control experiments, we would
like to think that protection by such organizations as Amnesty International
can be achieved beforehand.
RELATED COVERT METHODOLOGIES
The persons engaged in this harassment tend to become careless,
possibly the result of arrogance born of an assumption that nobody can
stop them. "Harassees" who have noted this carelessness have furnished
us with the following insights into the covert side of these harassment
* Impersonation of military officers.
One individual found that her next-door neighbor had claimed to be a military
intelligence officer, assigned to a space technology unit in California,
on year-long "TDY" (temporary duty) in the individual's apartment building.
It is subsequently determined that this alleged officer is not in fact
a member of the U.S. Armed Forces; and that he had used this bogus status
to acquire information from a major defense contractor. Our contact is
certain that this person's apartment was used as a base of harassment
* Use of concealment devices, and emitters detected to date.
Several individuals and supportive associates report having seen some
of the electronic devices being used in these harassment campaigns.
One saw electronic equipment concealed inside a false-front upright piano
being moved out of her apartment building. She had previously noted that
all of her surrounding neighbors had identical upright pianos in their
apartments, not one of which was ever played.
Other suspected participants in the harassment may be concealing devices
in oversized stereo speakers, measuring approximately 5' in height x 3'x3'.
Several of our contacts have noted the presence of such speakers in adjacent
One individual was told by a resident of her building that her upstairs
neighbor has "microwave ovens" in his bedroom and livingroom, but none
in the kitchen.
Another individual, while standing outside, looked in her neighbor's window
to find that her bedroom appeared to be the target of a gray-colored,
elongated box-like device, measuring approximately 1' in length x 5" in
height (side view). A large, black-framed lens protruded from the end
facing her window. The electrical cord, if any, was not visible from that
vantage point. The equipment was being operated by a stranger in a three-piece
suit, who appeared to be quite startled to find that he was being observed.
Another was given strong reason to believe that portable emitters are
being concealed in oversized, extremely heavy, sometimes expandable "briefcases"
for use in places of public assembly, such as meeting halls, auditoriums
and restaurants. Smaller varieties are apparently being used on aircraft.
On a 3-hour flight, our contact noticed that the man sitting next to her
seemed peculiarly intent on keeping the attache case on his lap propped
open with his fingertips, while he gazed "blankly" into the distance during
the entire flight. She believed that she was being electronically harassed
while on a flight (a common complaint, in most of these cases now being
Our contact reports that, when they prepared to land, the man opened his
attache case to hastily check his contents, thus disclosing the presence
of a raised, built-in "concealment device" covering the entire bottom
surface of the attache case. The low-slung, lift-off cover did not appear
to be capable of concealing a laptop computer. At one point during the
flight -- apparently aware that his "reverie" was inviting attention,
-- the man devoted approximately ten minutes to scribbling assorted entries
on a sheet of lined paper, which he had placed on top of the briefcase
two hours previously. He devoted roughly ten minutes to the effort (obviously
preferring a pen to a laptop computer). His attache case remained ajar
during this process.(5)
One individual reports that mobile emitters may be installed in certain
oversized, non-attributed medical emergency vehicles, possibly for the
eventual use in civil disturbances. Her unsuccessful attempts at following
the "medical emergency" vehicle which had surfaced in her case ended with
a high-speed chase.
The phony military intelligence officer, when recently moving out of our
contact's apartment building, was found to possess a device which resembles
an oversized microwave oven, measuring approximately 4' in width x 2'
in height x 2 1/2' in depth. A subsequent examination of his apartment
revealed that he had tapped numerous additional lines into existing, in-house
telephone and TV cables; and that he had gone to great pains to conceal
a major excavation into one wall abutting the "harassee's." Judging from
photographs taken immediately after this person's departure, the wiring
suggests that he was hooked by modem into a computer network, and at least
of some of his electronic equipment was situated in a large walk-in closet,
again abutting the "harassee's."
When the alleged officer moved out, his equipment (except for the oversized
"microwave oven") was packaged in boxes identifying the contents only
as stereo components. During his year-long residency in this building,
no sounds emanated from his apartment to indicate use of this "stereo"
* Use of modified license plates and vehicle look-alikes.
Some individuals have noted that their neighbors' vehicles are periodically
replaced (during peak periods of harassment) by others which qualify as
"rough look-alikes." These tags on the latter closely resemble those on
the homeowners' vehicles, with a difference being noted in only one digit
or one letter. These modified plates appear to have been acquired through
State DMV channels, thus suggesting government/intelligence agency involvement.
In one case, where the individual has obtained police assistance, tracking
of one plate surfaced evidence of a drug connection. The plate rapidly
disappeared from the vehicle in question, to be replaced by another, again
bearing a one-letter modification.
* Use of neighbors' residences as bases of operation and training.
One individual recently saw a team of "technicians" in the house behind
hers -- a consequence of the team's failure to close the curtains and/or
dim the lights when puttering around the kitchen at 5:00 in the morning.
The three men (strangers to this individual, all stripped down to their
T-shirts) behaved as if they were unaware that they were being watched.
Their observer had long suspected that this house was being used as a
base of electronic harassment operations. The harassment had been going
on throughout the night.
To provoke a response from these men, the individual eventually commented
aloud on their activities. They responded immediately by turning the lights
off and switching to the use of flashlights. Why they failed to close
the curtain is unknown.
This individual is working with the police in a effort at ending this
surveillance and harassment, with mixed results.
Another individual, paying a surprise visit to the apartment upstairs,
overheard one of her own telephone conversations being played on a tape
recorder inside that apartment. Lacking both a legitimate pretext to enter
the apartment and the support of the building's management personnel and/or
the police, she was prevented from pursuing this further. Her upstairs
neighbor is purportedly employed by Stanford University Hospital, in Stanford,
The target of surveillance and harassment in this case is still also trying
to recover from the effects of exposure to potentially lethal doses of
radiation, administered in the 1970's by a dangerously "incompetent" dentist.
This might explain the involvement of alleged Stanford University Hospital
personnel in her situation.
The government is on record as having experimented on unwitting U.S. citizens
with radioactive materials during the 1970's (and earlier).(6) The House
Subcommittee on Energy and Commerce based their investigation into this
matter on a 30-year accumulation of documents maintained by the Department
of Energy. Under the circumstances, it will come as no surprise if it
is ultimately found that DoE has been involved in this woman's surveillance
Another individual paid a surprise visit to the apartment immediately
below hers, in the attempt to identify the source of tremendous racket
in her ventilation system. Standing outside the door, she could hear an
individual moving around, a short distance from the door. She also heard
the sound of rustling paper and the steady, sonar-like "pinging" of some
type of electronic device. In response to her repeated knockings on the
door, the person inside simply stopped moving about. The sound of rustling
paper (perhaps a printout of some type) and the steady "...pin-ng!...pin-ng!"
sound continued. The occupant of this apartment resumed moving about only
after it was (incorrectly) believed that our contact had departed the
area. Typically, this situation could not be pursued further.
All of those who live in apartment buildings report unusual patterns of
occupancy in the apartments surrounding their own; i.e., upstairs, downstairs
and on all sides. They have become quite convinced -- if only because
of the highly focused nature of the systems being experienced -- that
these surrounding apartments are being used as bases of operation. Perhaps
this encirclement facilities studies of holographic human telemetries;
or perhaps it is intended to increase the prospect of brain entrainment
by electronic means ("entrainment" being one published objective sought
in mind control experiments).(7)
In examining this situation more closely, a number of individuals have
found that surrounding apartments are either permanently vacant, for unknown
reasons, or that they have been "sub-let" by the original occupants to
persons who are purportedly unknown to the buildings' management personnel.
In one case, the surrounding renters all list two residences in the local
telephone book. No one lives in the apartment building in question, though
the address is identified as one of the renters' places of residence.
One individual suspects that the original occupants of apartments surrounding
hers have been simply relocated to other apartments in the same (large)
building. Another suspects that an adjacent apartment, which has been
permanently rented to the U.S. Government for use by "visitors" is also
being used as a base of operations.
One individual found that an immediate neighbor's housemate has the same
(unusual) name of a university professor who has engaged in extensive
research on behalf of the government, studying the bioeffects of exposure
to microwave radiation.
* Use of informants/agents provocateurs, frequently members of the opposite
As noted in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Interior and
Insular Affair's draft report, Alyeska Pipeline Service Company Covert
Operation (July 1992), the Wackenhut Corporation's Special Investigations
Division adopted this tactic when pursuing Alyeska's critics.
A number of individuals in touch with us report a range of experiences
with new "friends" who -- apparently posing as confidants -- used acquired
personalia to abruptly end these "friendships" under deliberately degrading
and humiliating circumstances. When taken in the context of ongoing surveillance
and harassment, these exercises appear intended to heighten emotional
trauma, perhaps to provoke an uncontrolled response and/or to enforce
* Misuse of covert intelligence personnel (possible former case officers).
One individual while under contract to the U.S. Government, properly reported
what he believed to be an approach by a hostile intelligence service.
Within a few weeks, alleged U.S. Intelligence officers contacted this
individual. In addition to questioning him about his background, these
alleged intelligence officers asked that he keep in constant contact with
them, particularly when planning to travel.
It soon became apparent that the alleged intelligence officers were intent
only on forcing this individual to report to them as directed, and to
account for his activities. He was not asked to assist the U.S. Government
in any form of intelligence operation; he was not asked to execute any
form of secrecy affirmation statement acknowledging the classified nature
of these meetings; nor was he told why these meetings -- involving a total
of seven alleged case officers -- were necessary.
When he began to balk at a continuation of this process, one of his "handlers"
conveyed a threat, suggesting that his continued compliance might be "enforced."
Finally, when this individual adamantly refused to corporate further,
massive overt harassment commenced and is currently ongoing.
The operation (clearly intended to bully this individual into submissive
compliance for purposes which are still unknown) involved crude tactics
formerly prized by the KGB.
Whether or not legitimate U.S. Intelligence case officers were involved
in this activity remains to be determined. Some private firms retain former
U.S. Intelligence case officers for contracting out as "security specialist."
The founder and CEO of one such firm (Gerald P. Burke, The Parvus Company,
Silver Spring, MD) has informed us that the activities of contract case
officers are neither monitored nor subjected to formal restraint.
* Use of psychotropic drugs by cooperative physicians.
Shortly after resigning from the CIA, one of our contacts underwent a
range of experiences which suggested that she had been massively drugged.
One of the alleged perpetrators, whom we have met, alternately claims
to be employed by NASA and/or by a firm in Miami, handling, "microwave
equipment." NASA has no record of this person under the name furnished.
The "experimentee" ultimately sought the assistance of a psychiatrist,
whom her parents had located as a referral. The psychiatrist treated her
reported "flashbacks" by immediately placing her on a regimen of Stelazine,
which quickly aggravated her condition. He also made comments to this
individual which suggested that he had a foreknowledge of her situation,
and that he was cooperating with U.S. Intelligence. On one occasion the
psychiatrist intimated that our contact might be employable as an assassin;
and he repeatedly urged her to move to Great Britain where, he said, she
would be put in touch with an unidentified Member of Parliament.
Interestingly, he had a tremendous computer system in his office suite,
which he explained as being connected by modem into a national level system
which, in turn, connected to private residences. When showing her this
equipment, the psychiatrist informed our contact that she had been "CAT
scanned," pointing out that she was the subject of a vast series of "A's"
and "B's" being printed out by one of the many terminals at his disposal.
Our contact also found out that this psychiatrist kept a military uniform
in his closet which bore the rank and insignia of a three-star general.
The individual ultimately sought psychiatric support elsewhere. Her new
psychiatrist, formerly employed by DoD, immediately put her on a regimen
of Haladol Decanoate, Klonopin and Benzatropine. The combined effect of
these drugs was loss of memory and a state of mind which, under other
circumstances, might be diagnosed as Depersonalization or Dissociative
Disorder. All three drugs proved to be highly addictive. Our contact,
since severing contact which this psychiatrist as well, has finally successfully
overcome the addiction.
Another individual -- the one whose psychiatrist had informed her of her
role in a "Pavlovian Experiment" -- was subjected to attempted drugging
by Trazodone, one of the strongest sedatives on the market. The psychiatrist
in question kept no record of the individual's outpatient visits, nor
of her Trazodone prescriptions. Being unaware that the individual was
not adhering to his regimen, the psychiatrist urged her rapidly to increase
her dosage, renewing her 30-day prescription after a period of only 11
Though aware of her heart condition, he failed to monitor her condition,
dismissing her complaints of (electronically-induced) pains in her heart
as inconsequential. Trazodone is known to aggravate heart conditions.
Perhaps the intent was to have this individual succumb to a "heart attack"
as the result of "imagined" government harassment. Neither the appropriate
psychiatric society nor the FBI would touch this case.
Another individual (a clear target of retaliation) sought medical assistance
to counter sudden massive headaches and recurrent attacks of vomiting
-- effects which can be produced by infrasound. The physician to whom
she was referred (an alleged specialist in Internal Medicine) placed her
on a combination of Compazine and Xanax, prescribing dosages which the
Physicians' Desk Reference warns against.
Compazine, in addition to being an anti-emetic, is used in the treatment
of psychotic disorders. It can also cause dyskinesia, an irreversible
syndrome involving loss of motor control. Xanax is known to induce vomiting.
Both drugs can lead to dependance and a worsening of the patient's condition.
The effects of all such drugs, in fact, can be mutated in high-energy
fields, thus increasing the likelihood of adverse reactions.
We have recently found that this prescribing "physician" is not licensed
to practice medicine in the State of which she has been practicing since
at least 1989.
Our contact, being concerned about the long-term effects of Xanax and
Compazine, consulted another physician in the same office. The physician
immediately prescribed Prozac, failing to concurrently recommend that
her patient discontinue the Xanax and Compazine prescriptions. When our
contact refused to take any psychotropic drugs, the doctor became upset
and asked, "Don't you want to get well?"
This second physician is a licensed practitioner in Internal Medicine,
with no background in Psychiatry. We also found that she apparently refers
her patients to yet a third physician in the office who claims to be a
psychiatrist. She, too, is licensed to practice Internal Medicine, only.
Her receptionist described this third physician as having a psychiatric
"sub-specialty," ... "as an internist." The receptionist also informed
us that this internist "is treating a number of psychiatric patients."
On pursuing this further, we find that these physicians are in a small
"medicine group" which is not listed by specialty in standard regional
telephone directories. The group bears the same name as one of the CIA's
most infamous recruited physicians (perhaps best described as "the Mengele
The doctor's offices are located in a bank building, which, we have found,
is a favored hiding place for security-oriented business and government
agencies. Two computer firms, co-located with an attorney who represents
"Island Resort Development, Ltd.," are situated immediately beneath the
doctors' offices. The prospect of finding island resort developments within
500 miles of this attorney's office is limited.
Our contact, being apprised of these findings, is seeking medical help
In two of our cases, urologist took it upon themselves to play the role
of "psychiatrist"; i.e., they rendered psychiatric diagnoses and prescribed
psychotropic drugs. One of these urologist, employed by The Mayo Clinic
in Rochester, MN, prescribed Haldol, informing our contact that he perceived
her to be "psychotic." His efforts at getting a Clinic psychiatrist to
confirm this diagnosis were unsuccessful. The psychiatrist, apparently
a rare individual who subscribes to codes of medical ethics, found nothing
wrong with this woman, even given the nature of her complaints. The urologist's
response to this was to issue his own Haldol prescription. Sensing that
something was amiss, the woman refused to have the prescription filled.
Yet another individual ended up in the hands of a psychiatrist who, as
a purported means of ending the stress associated with her harassment,
offered to put her under hypnosis. She described the hypnotic state as
"equivalent to floating" and (based on her overall experiences with this
physician) has not ruled out the possibility that drugs may have been
surreptitiously administered. The psychiatrist claimed to be interested
in psychic phenomena and demonstrated an apparently remarkable ability
to read the individual's mind.
While in her "hypnotic state, the individual felt like a sharp, painful
pressure inside her nose, as if something were being shoved up her nostrils
to the sinus cavities. She awoke to find blood pouring from her nostrils.
The psychiatrist casually dismissed this as owing to a probable cold.
Shortly after the experience, the individual began to hear loud tones
in her head, followed in due coarse by auditory input. Brain scans have
failed to yield evidence of an implant device. (We have recommended that
she undergo a scan by means of a suitably adapted non-linear junction
detector, as a preliminary.) Suffice to say, this individual has severed
contact with the psychiatrist and is continuing to cope with the ongoing
overt electronic harassment by other non-medical means.
* Use of medical implant devices.
The situation just described is not our first encounter with the apparent
use of medical implant devices in these harassment/mind- control cases.
Another of our contacts began receiving auditory input roughly 15 years
after she had a 4 mm. cochlear implants placed in her ears. The "voices"
claimed to be affiliated with the CIA and, among other things, expressed
intentions of running this woman as an agent in denied areas by "piggybacking"
their audio transmissions onto standard FM frequencies to avoid detection.
We have been unable to locate the surgeon who implanted these devices,
though we do have a copy of his operative reports. A recent CAT scan of
this individual failed to disclose the presence of the cochlear implants.
Several years ago, the individual (now a psychologist) applied for a position
with the CIA. She was interviewed by four Langley- based, purported psychologists,
who allegedly informed her that her job would involve the assessments
of certain criminals for purposes of weighing their purposes for loyalty
to this agency.
During these interviews, she was told to read several books by such persons
as Philip Agee, Stansfield Turner and Ralph McGehee, all of whom were
unknown to her. The alleged psychologist claimed that these authors had
described the CIA "as it really is." Our contact was not asked to execute
a security affirmation statement acknowledging the classified nature of
The unconventional manner of this interview process suggested that this
individual was being toyed with, for reason which remain to be determined.
She did not get the job and in fact more recently lost her job with a
state penitentiary. She was fired on the recommendation of the prison's
psychiatrist, because of her insistence that she is receiving auditory
input from the CIA personnel who persist in feeding her classified information.
Interestingly, though this individual was deemed unfit to function as
a psychologist in the penitentiary system, the State rehired her, assigning
her to a mental health facility where, apparently, she is to develop a
behavioral modification program for retarded adults with a diagnosed mental
This individual claimed to be receiving and responding to externally-induced
auditory "advice" while working with prison inmates. It may be presumed
that the process will continue. Under the circumstances, we have to wonder
if this case qualifies as a benchmark in mind-control experimentation;
i.e., employment of a mind-controlled psychologist to run the equivalent
of mind-control experiments on mentally-ill retarded adults. We will continue
to monitor this situation.
The individual we previously identified as having challenged a local power
company also appears to have ben "tagged" by some type of implant device.
During a recent symposium, she was approached by a man whose business
card identifies him as "Program Manager, Electromagnetic Radiation Division,"
DoE. His approach was suitably sympathetic. Our contact ultimately accepted
this man's invitation to continue discussing their common ranges of interest
in his hotel room. During this meeting, she accepted the offer of a drink,
blacked out after consuming it, and woke up four hours later, still in
this man's hotel room, to find that the back of her ear had been punctured
and was bleeding. There was no evidence of sexual assault. The man glibly
evaded this woman's request for an explanation. She has since found two
adjacent puncture marks behind her ear, which are not healing properly,
and between which she can feel the presence of a "wire" measuring approximately
1/3" in length. We are pursuing this further.
The said DoE Project Manager has more recently initiated contact with
yet another activist in touch with this Association. His call was unsolicited.
He apparently wanted to know to know if this woman would be attending
an upcoming conference. We have warned the individual to avoid any form
of private meeting with the said Project Manager.
To date, we are aware of three cases involving clandestine behavior on
the part of alleged DoE employees. The CIA figures prominently (if peculiarly)
in the majority of the other cases. Two of those have been discussed above.
I another, also involving auditory input, the individual is certain that
the current Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) participated in the
"voice transmission" process on at least one occasion. She claims to have
recognized his voice. When she commented aloud on the DCI's perceived
involvement in this experimentation, the "voice" responded with stuttered
and stammered denials. We are told that this particular "voice" has not
been heard from since.
In yet another case involving auditory input, the individual has allegedly
been informed by her "voices" that the technologies being used against
her were stolen from the CIA by a maverick employee, whose group is not
targeting her from a distance of 2,000 miles. She reported this to the
DCI's office and was allegedly informed by the Deputy DCI that she will
be awarded millions of dollars if she can produce the equipment and any
of the personnel involved in her harassment.
One usually-candid CIA spokesman also allegedly informed this individual
that, "while the CIA does not deny having this equipment," they "do not
use it in this country." Perhaps this explains why a number of our contacts
have also been electronically harassed while traveling overseas.
This woman has also been repeatedly assured by CIA DDS (security) personnel
of the Agency's sincere concern for her welfare. During a recent telephone
conversation with that Office, we confirmed that she is indeed known to
the CIA. Based on this, we asked that the Agency "put its money where
its mouth is," so to speak, by conducting a long-term electronic sweep
of this individual's premises. That was two months ago. No sweep has been
conducted, though CIA spokesmen continue to "sympathize" with her predicament.
Another individual, a target of harassment and experimentation since 1952
(apparently singled out because of his student activism while at Penn
State University) began hearing "voices" after having most of his teeth
capped. He has been more recently been informed by his "handlers" that
implanted devices are no longer used for purposes of inducing auditory
input. No explanation was offered. He was quite visibly surprised when
informed by this investigator that auditory input can be achieved solely
by means of pulsed microwave audiograms (discussed in Part I of this report).
The individual's "handlers" allegedly have also stated that their experiments
on U.S. citizens are in pursuit of a variety of objectives; viz.,
(1) develop an effective means for creating a perfect, "robotized" soldier;
(2) alter individual sexual performances, such as by turning heterosexuals
into homosexuals (they allegedly claim to be having "difficulties" reversing
(3) enhance and destroy levels of academic achievement, at will, such
as by degrading the performance of otherwise brilliant students, and by
drastically improving the performance of poor students.
Given the technology at the government's disposal and a predisposition
of the part of certain governmental agencies to "play God" in experimental
fashion with citizens' lives, these purported projects do not come across
as being totally far-fetched.
Another case involves a woman whose experiences suggest that she, too,
is an MKULTRA experimentee being kept on the books, so to speak. The woman,
apparently a "pet" experimentee, found herself being introduced to a wide
array of prominent individuals whose connections with the CIA she believed
to be quite apparent. One of those she states, was Robert Jay Lifton,
a well-known author and expert on brainwashing, whose books include "The
Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide" (Basic Books,
Her experiences included a voluntary ("referral") admission to Hollywood
Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, in 1973, during an era
when MKULTRA experiments at the Alan Memorial Institute, McGill University,
Montreal, Canada, were only beginning to capture the attention of the
More recently, in 1990, she was transported to New York University's Cameron
Medical Center, in Westchester, NY (under circumstance which qualify as
an abduction), where she was forcibly wrestled to the ground by approximately
six Center staffers and forcibly confined for a period of approximately
three weeks. She was neither psychiatrically counseled nor formally tested
while in that facility. The psychiatrists assigned to her case appeared
more intent on forcing her to take a combination of neuroleptic drugs,
to include Haldol, Navane, and Cogentin. (Haldol and Navane can cause
tardive dyskinesia.) She resisted those attempts.
A court ultimately ordered this woman released from the Center, stipulating
that she was not to be administered drugs. On subsequently acquiring her
medical records, under conditions which prevented censoring or doctoring
those records, she found that her psychiatrists had planned to inject
her with drugs (in defiance of the court order) on the day of her release.
As luck would have it, she was released a day early.
The woman states that she has met Budd Hopkins, of the Intruders Foundation,
and that she had a long-term, confiding relationship with John E. Mack,
Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and the founding Director
of the Center for Psychological Studies in the Nuclear Age (previously
named, Research Program for the Study of Human Continuity; and, still
previously, rumored to have cooperated with the CIA in studies of "human
At one point in their relationship, Professor Mack apparently accompanied
this woman to a "support group" meeting of UFO abductees, who, she observed
bemusedly, "spent their time comparing [extraterrestrially] implanted
devices." Professor Mack is on record as promoting the perception that
UFO abductions are legitimate.(9)
We frankly doubt that extraterrestrials who have a means to commute intergalactically
would stoop to implanting comparatively devices in human beings. However,
should it be proved that the psychiatrist, surgeon and DoE Project Manager
above are extraterrestrials posing as humans, we will be happy to weigh
that information. If it is similarly established to the vehicular "abduction"
of the woman discussed above was the work of an extraterrestrial named
Kaplan, who was posing as a human with Cornell Medical Center connections,
we will be happy to ponder that as well.
In the meantime, it would seem reasonable that the government would want
the public to believe that extraterrestrial visitations are on the upswing.
Mind-altering drugs, externally-induced auditory input, holographic projections
(also a DoD capability),(10) appropriately focused directed-energy targeting,
device implantations, special effects and abductions are all within this
government's capabilities and can be used for purposes of creating illusions
of UFO experiences. Persons not cognizant of this might be more inclined
to fall for the UFO mythologies now being officially "legitimized."
Other cases, possibly involving U.S. Navy Intelligence, NSA, the Drug
Enforcement Agency (DEA) and, peripherally, members of the former Soviet
Bloc intelligence services will be discussed in further reports.
In his book, Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control, Dr. Harvey
Weinstein quotes the following passage from a book entitled, A battle
for the Mind: A Physiology in Conversion and Brainwashing, by William
Sergeant (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1957):
"By increasing the prolong stress in various ways, or inducing physical
debilitation, a more thorough alteration of the person's thinking process
may be achieved. ...If the stress or physical debilitation, or both, are
carried one stage further, it may happen that patterns of thought and
behavior, especially those of recent acquisition, become disrupted. New
patterns can then be substituted, or suppressed patterns allowed to reassert
themselves; or the subject might begin to think or act in ways precisely
contradict his former ones.
"'...If a complete sudden collapse can be produced by prolonging or intensifying
emotional stress, the cortical slate may be wiped clean temporarily of
its more recently implanted patterns of behavior, perhaps allowing others
to be substituted more easily.'"
Dr. Weinstein then comments: "The parallel with [Dr. Ewen] Cameron's theory
of differential amnesia is striking, and the relationship to brainwashing
is abundantly clear."(11) Dr. Cameron, employed by McGill University's
Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, between 1943 and
1964, conducted brainwashing experiments upon select, non-volunteer psychiatric
patients on behalf of the CIA. Dr. Weinstein's father was one of Cameron's
Sergeant's theorems and Cameron's associated experimental findings appear
to be the driving force behind the harassment and experimentation now
being reported to this Association. All of these individuals are being
subjected to a series of overlapping circumstances which apparently are
meant to induce and sustain long-term extremes of stress. All of these
individuals have been effectively isolated. Unethical psychiatrists and
physicians are involved in the majority of these cases. Mind-altering
prescription drugs are being used for clearly non-therapeutic purposes.
Evidence of LSD use is also beginning to surface (one of Cameron's favored
mind-altering substances). And "psychic driving" techniques -- Cameron's
pet brainwashing method -- are involved in all these cases, to a much
greater and more potentially effective degree where auditory input is
The long-term objectives of these harassment and experimentation campaigns
appear to be quite fundamental; viz.,
(1) induce a sense of perverted "loyalty" toward the very agencies engaged
in the individual's harassment, to confuse his or her priorities where
the possibility of obtaining legal redress might be concerned;
(2) redirect the targeted individual's feelings of hopelessness, anger
and frustration toward racial and ethnic groups, and toward select, prominent
political figures, to include the President of the United States;
(3) force the individual to commit an act of violence, whether suicide
or murder, under conditions which he can be plausibly denied by the government.
An operation's ultimate success apparently hangs on this latter objective.
We have successfully obstructed this process in a number of cases now
THE "STALKER" PHENOMENON
In recent weeks, considerable publicity has been given the trauma of
the victim's of "stalkers" (persons who obsessively surveil, harass and,
in some cases, kill targeted individuals for assorted, unfathomable reasons).
Movie stars that have been stalked recurrently make the news. Stalking,
as a problem, is in fact becoming widespread, to a point where, in some
States, the activity has finally been specifically proscribed by law.
The individuals in contact with our Association are reporting the same
terrifying ranges of experiences as are now being reported by the press
on behalf of other victims stalkers. The only difference in the cases
reported to us is that the stalkers operate in groups over extremely long
periods of time, and (it would appear) with the blessings of certain agencies
of the U.S. Government. The laws being passes to protect victims of stalkers
are clearly being selectively applied. We hope to put an end to this situation;
that is, in addition to achieving the objects discussed above.
It should be noted that the FBI, though unwilling to intervene in the
cases described above recently intervened on a massive scale to protect
Joy Silverman, a Bush-appointed trustee of the J.F. Kennedy Center for
the Performing Arts, from the ardent "stalkings" of her estranged paramour,
Sol Wachtler, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals in the State of New York.(12)
Wachtler had apparently threatened to kidnap Silverman's daughter if not
paid $20,000. Since no kidnapping had occurred, the case qualified merely
as an attempted extortion, a question arises as to why the New York State
Police could not have handled this investigation. Mr. Silverman resides
in New York.
It would appear that the FBI devoted more than 100 agents and technicians
to the effort, resolving the case within approximately 30 days. On November
7, 1992, the day of his arrest, Wachtler ran a gauntlet of 80 FBI special
agents on the Long Island Expressway. Apparently the FBI does not have
enough to do, if staking out a lone stalker is their top priority. We
have to wonder, of course, if the FBI's massive response was prompted
by what was perceived to be Wachtler's usurpation of governmental stalking
Mrs. Silverman's $300,000 donations to Republican Party causes could be
considered a basis for the FBI's solicitous concern for her welfare. It
would appear, under the circumstances, that the "stalking victims" discussed
above -- being by now poverty-stricken -- should abandon all hope of FBI
intervention in their respective situations. FBI protection appears to
have a price tag, which not one of our contacts can afford.
(1) Peters, Edward, Torture, Basil Blackwell, Inc., New York/London, 1985
(2) The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, OH, June 28, 1991, p.4-B ("Psychiatrist
Testifies at mom's Hearing"); November 6, 1991, (Woman Ruled Competent
for Trial"); and December 21, 1991, p. 4-C ("Ruling Expected Monday on
Sanity of Parma Mother/Woman says she stabbed her 3 children to protect
(3) The Washington Post, June 1, 1991, p. C-1 ("Voices' Led to Tragedy
for 2 Men/Pentagon Suspect's Mother Says Institutions Should Have Held
Son") and December 14, 1991, p. D-3 ("Suspect in Pentagon Killing Is Found
Unfit to Stand Trial").
(4) The Washington Post, September 4, 1992, p. D-3 ("Freight Train kills
Woman Near Home in Silver Spring").
(5) Jane's Security and Co-In [Counter-Insurgency] Equipment, (Surrey,
UK, 1991-92), as a preliminary source, contains a number of references
to attache-case concealment devices, for use in surveillance/communications
operations. The electronic components are built into the bottom interior
of these cases. Obviously the man just described could not have carried
a "microcircuitried" attache case aboard a U.S. airliner without first
clearing security. We were advised by a former CIA DDS (Security) employee
that credential-carrying members of U.S. Intelligence can bypass airport
security checks of their carry-on luggage.
(6) Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch, October 15, 1986, p. 1-A ("U.S. Used
Humans for Radiation Guinea Pigs").
(7) See, for example, Weinstein, Harvey M., M.D., Psychiatry and the CIA:
Victims of Mind Control, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, D.C.,
1990; Marks, John, The Search for the "Manchurian Candidate" The CIA and
Mind Control, Times Books, New York, 1979; Delgado, Jose M. R., M.D.,
Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society, Harper
& Row, New York, 1969; and Hutchison, Michael, Megabrain: New Tools and
Techniques for Brain Growth and Mind Expansion, Ballantine Books, New
(8) According to a Vancouver Sun archivist, Hollywood Hospital, Ltd. (a
privately-owned institution), went out of business in 1975, two years
after this woman's hospitalization and after approximately 30 years of
doing business. The event coincided with findings by the U.S. Senate Church
Committee concerning the CIA's brainwashing experiments under MKULTRA.
Our contact also identified the Director of the Hollywood Hospital as
Dr. Ross MacLean -- information also confirmed by the Vancouver Sun. Nothing
in these records, copies of which are being obtained, points to CIA involvement
with the hospital. Perhaps a portion of history has been overlooked. Cornell
Medical Center's role in MKULTRA is a matter of public record. (See, for
example, Thomas, Gordon, Journey Into Madness: The True Story of the CIA
Mind Control and Medical Abuse, Bantam Books, New York, 1989).
(9) The Roper Organization, Unusual Personal Experiences: An Analysis
of the Data from Three National Surveys, (Bigelow Holding Corp., Las Vegas,
NY, 1991. Contributors lending "credibility" to this publication include
John Mack and Budd Hopkins.
(10) Defense Week, October 19, 1992, Vol. 13, No. 41, pp. I & II, ("Pentagon,
State [Department] Collaborate on Counterterror Gear").
(11) Op. cit., Weinstein, pp. 140-141.
(12) The Washington Post, November 10, 1992, p. A-1 ("An Unlikely Suspect
for Scandal/Top N.Y. Judge Accused of Breaking Law in Secret Life").
There can never be any justification for torture. It creates an escalation
of violence in the internal affairs of states. It spreads like a contagious
disease from country to country. It has lasting effects on the mental
and physical health of the victim and brutalizes the torturer. It is fundamental
duty as human beings to express what is surely the conscience of humanity
and to eradicate this evil.
[Amnesty International, February 1990, in the context of the U.S. Government's
continuing failure to ratify the U.N. Convention Against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, dated December 10,